Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you look at the tech specs the 31mm screen is actually 4mm bigger than the 41mm Apple Watch width. The 41mm for Apple is the diag dimension and Googles 41mm is the total width of the circle. When you do give up the 4mm in height that the square version gives. Don't mock bezels since an iPhone still has thick bezels too.

You’re right that the 41mm Apple Watch has a display that’s more narrow than the Pixel watch, but 41mm does not refer to the diagonal measurement of the display. It refers to the vertical height of the case. The 41mm has a display that’s about 37mm diagonal and 26mm wide, the 45mm has a display that’s about 44mm diagonal, and the Ultra I haven’t measured yet, but its display is probably about 45mm diagonal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: paulypants
243-001.jpg



Looks like an 80s Swatch, and not in a cool retro way. Even the enormous bezels make it look like it's got that same plastic crystal covering the dial/display.

And that ergonomically frustrating tiny (and gold, eeurgh) digital crown.

Such lazy retrograde design masquerading as "simplicity".
 
Last edited:
That is an incredible amount of bezel...can you even fit a 140 character SMS on the screen? I know that UI is likely spaced out like that so that it is touch friendly, but you can literally see just one item at a time...

People demand to have a round watch. Google delivers, but with seriously limitations as a result.

Form over function.

Meet Apple Watch ... a watch that is usable.
 
So much happier with the Ultra.

FYI, if you have a M1 Mac or iOS device and don't know Japanese, you can translate that text by just highlighting it.

睡眠状態中心拍数乞追跡 = "Sleep state central beat begging"
Unfortunately, that doesn't work within Firefox - have to view in Safari.
 
Also just a design thing - but the hour hand on that default watch face is way to thick. Every 3 hours one of your complications will be unusable for about 45 minutes...

To be fair, Apple has this same issue, but on a smaller scale given AW's smaller hand thickness. But it does make me wonder why we haven't gotten a "sliding" complication face where the complications shift in a circle to avoid being blocked by the hands. It's the main benefit of being a digital watch - the watch face can do literally anything you want it to.
A "complication island"?
 
It looks OK. At least looks to be of decent quality...

Interested to see what faces they will have with it.
 
Did the industrial design team and OS design team never meet during the process? Because that interface doesn't match the form factor that they've jammed it into. Awful. 😂
 
It won't work with any iPhone, just like an Apple Watch won't work with any Android device.
So they're not competitors by any means.
That was the big change Google made with Wear OS 3. They killed iOS support.
We saw this with the Galaxy Watch 4. Samsung ditched Tizen and went to Wear OS and killed off any support for iOS in the process.
I actually liked my Active 2 and was looking forward to the GW 4. I like round watches.
Did the industrial design team and OS design team never meet during the process? Because that interface doesn't match the form factor that they've jammed it into. Awful. 😂

I agree about the look of the hardware but I actually like the OS interface, it is a clean look, not confusing, not a mash of those flat circular icons on the Apple Watch, not the second rate look of the Samsung Watch interface, I think it has promise.

Of course as people here noted, Google has a history of abandoning its products, will they actually try to build a solid Apple alternative ecosystem? Their video presentation showed some nice ways in which all of their products integrate, not certain it is any different than how Apple's products integrate, but is their voice assistant better than Siri, I don't know.

And the Pixel Watch looked crippled in the watch faces they presented, where are the different complications, do they have them but did not want to show them because they don't want to appear to compete with the Samsung watch line? Can they display stock quotes, news headlines, more granular weather details like wind speed and direction?

I just want to see more solid competition, more Apple alternatives, not certain Google will sell these in numbers that even get close to Apple, but I hope they sell enough to keep the ecosytem viable to the Google CEO and team.

Oh and the security and privacy that was touted in their presentation, I hope it is true and effective, I would like to see someone credible parse the privacy differences between the Google and Apple ecosystems.
 
Interesting that Google chose to use Samsung's Exynos 9110 processor for their watch.
Same processor used in the Galaxy Watch 3.
So you have a high price point on a watch with a 3 year old CPU. :rolleyes:

Love the styling, but it ends there.
 
Interesting that Google chose to use Samsung's Exynos 9110 processor for their watch.
Same processor used in the Galaxy Watch 3.
So you have a high price point on a watch with a 3 year old CPU. :rolleyes:

Love the styling, but it ends there.
The thing is there simply isn’t a better SoC for watches out there right now from Samsung or Qualcomm…because nobody knows how to make this a money making venture but Apple.
 
It's very nice of Google to include some screen with that Bezel.
I think this will be popular. Clearly no one‘s going to choose this over an Apple Watch but if you have an android phone that means you can’t have an Apple Watch so this will have to do.
 
I think this will be popular. Clearly no one‘s going to choose this over an Apple Watch but if you have an android phone that means you can’t have an Apple Watch so this will have to do.

The native watch faces are so basic, does anyone know, does Wear OS allow for third party watch faces? There are not many complications available on the current set of watch faces.
 
Why did they rip off the wheel? Pathetic Giggle as usual. Then they ripped off the sports band.

But hey at least it has a feature Apple doesn't have:
Collects your personal data for ads.

Has a security expert or anyone written an article about the current Pixel Watch/Pixel Phone 7 and the amount of data it leaks vs the Iphone/Apple Watch?

This is not snark, I genuinely want to know, thank you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.