Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So let's say you have a folder called Geneology on your computer. It contains 45 photos that you've scanned and edited. They have never been on your iPhone or iPad. How do you get this as a folder onto your iPad?

If it's an operating system folder, as opposed to a Photos app folder, then it won't work. The iCloud Photo Library syncing is for photos and videos in the Photos app, and it will preserve the folder and album structure which will be synced across all your devices. Copying operating system folders to iCloud Drive will not sync them with your devices.
 
That was indeed a security weakness in the password reset screen - one which Apple has since addressed - but it was not the attack vector that was used.

Some celebrities’ iCloud accounts were compromised when hackers correctly answered security questions to obtain their passwords, or when they were victimized by a phishing scam to obtain user IDs and passwords. Tim Cook stated that none of the Apple IDs and passwords leaked from the company’s servers.
We don't really know if that exploit with the password screen was or wasn't used--just because someone somewhere said it wasn't, doesn't mean that's the case. There certainly was an exploit on Apple's side, whether or not it plaid a big role in all of this doesn't change that fact. There was also the part that 2-factor authentication didn't apply to a lot of things, like iCloud backups, which could have gotten in the way of a lot of these hacks. Those items have been corrected since, but the fact that they were in play at the time means that there was something or lack of something that should have been there on Apple's side that contributed to it all.
 
Not sure if this question was asked? But how does one import their "mac" photo library to google photo. Ran the Google app, but it will not see the mac photo library since it is a packaged. Do I have to manually export out?
 
That was indeed a security weakness in the password reset screen - one which Apple has since addressed - but it was not the attack vector that was used.

Some celebrities’ iCloud accounts were compromised when hackers correctly answered security questions to obtain their passwords, or when they were victimized by a phishing scam to obtain user IDs and passwords. Tim Cook stated that none of the Apple IDs and passwords leaked from the company’s servers.

In the end, no system is 100% secure. But it's important to remember that security policies aside, Apple has been fighting to increase their users' privacy while Google, Facebook, and others have been working to accomplish the opposite.

If you ever took the time to stop by anonib, you would know that the unlimited attempts allowed was the main reason they were able to gain access to the icloud accounts. None of celebs were victims of phishing scams. Apple only started increasing user privacy after all the heat they took from the leaked photos.
 
Be sure to check out Google's license agreement for their "free" Google Photos service!

When you upload, submit, store, send or receive content to or through our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content.

The rights you grant in this license are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting, and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. - Google

OMG! Now let's look at Apple's iCloud terms and agreement:

by submitting or posting such Content on areas of the Service that are accessible by the public or other users with whom you consent to share such Content, you grant Apple a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available, without any compensation or obligation to you. - Apple

Wait a second. Looks familiar.

Every one of the following quotes supports the fact that Google gives or sells your information to third parties:
...
"We will share personal information with companies, organizations or individuals outside of Google"

It helps if you leave some of your cherry-picked quotes in the correct context:

For legal reasons

We will share personal information with companies, organizations or individuals outside of Google if we have a good-faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of the information is reasonably necessary to:

- meet any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request.
- enforce applicable Terms of Service, including investigation of potential violations.
- detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues.
- protect against harm to the rights, property or safety of Google, our users or the public as required or permitted by law.

Google


Again, let's look at Apple's similar policy:

It may be necessary − by law, legal process, litigation, and/or requests from public and governmental authorities within or outside your country of residence − for Apple to disclose your personal information.

We may also disclose information about you if we determine that for purposes of national security, law enforcement, or other issues of public importance, disclosure is necessary or appropriate.

We may also disclose information about you if we determine that disclosure is reasonably necessary to enforce our terms and conditions or protect our operations or users.

Additionally, in the event of a reorganization, merger, or sale we may transfer any and all personal information we collect to the relevant third party.

Apple

A few years back I used to post privacy policy quotes that had people up in arms about how terrible they were. That's because they assumed the quotes were from Google. But they were from Apple. Most people have never bothered to read Apple's policies, and would be surprised at what they allow.
 
Last edited:
Funny how it went from a thread about photo service to privacy issues. Gotta love the forums that get off topic. :rolleyes:
 
Most people have never bothered to read Apple's policies, and would be surprised at what they allow themselves.

Apparently they don't need to now :D it's all here in black and white... (...or rather blue and red.)

The only place Apple does do good in on iOS 8, when they encypt the phone, and Google does the same on their latest models..

It's only once u start using the cloud, do things change.
 
Funny how it went from a thread about photo service to privacy issues. Gotta love the forums that get off topic. :rolleyes:
It turns quickly to that any time it's something about a service from Google or Facebook.
 
Funny how it went from a thread about photo service to privacy issues. Gotta love the forums that get off topic. :rolleyes:

obviously it went that way just because its a google product but i would say that the free unlimited from google and 1 TB (=unlimited for most) from flickr etc requires us to stop and think a little bit. pretty much everything we deemed important and personal decades ago we are willing to store at some server farm today.
 
It's always amazing how people who don't want to use something, try to find arguments to stop others from using it as well.

And worse, make up bogus reasons.
And in the process often stand behind some other similar services that they imply are somehow better in those respects, but usually really aren't.

----------

obviously it went that way just because its a google product but i would say that the free unlimited from google and 1 TB (=unlimited for most) from flickr requires us to stop and think a little bit. pretty much everything we deemed important decades ago we are willing to store at some server farm today.
That's the internet.
 
Have these been answered yet? I don't have time to read 11 pages. iPhoto/Photos has been wearing on me for years with it's strange organization methods.

Haven't used it long enough to know for sure...but here's my first thought...
There's a desktop uploader that looks to monitor specified folders and upload anything new. I might need to redo my aperture library to reference external files, but if I did then I could just point the uploader to that folder and it 'should' work.
 
obviously it went that way just because its a google product but i would say that the free unlimited from google and 1 TB (=unlimited for most) from flickr etc requires us to stop and think a little bit. pretty much everything we deemed important and personal decades ago we are willing to store at some server farm today.

The price of convenience.
 
That's the internet.

obviously. but i just think it requires more forethought by users and not just clicking "accept".

The price of convenience.

perhaps. i think for the average person its more of a detachment and making them dependant on a selection of very few companies. then there is the fact that we as users have little idea how much "we" and our info are really worth.
 
Last edited:
Can't be any worse than Photos.

How would one migrate from iPhoto to this though?

There's a Mac Google Photos app ( https://photos.google.com/apps -- click 'Desktop Uploader').

When you've downloaded this, you can select what folders you want backed up (including iPhoto Library).

Also, if you log in to Google Drive from a browser on your Mac, it should ask if you want to include Google Photos into your Google Drive folder (if you have it on your Mac -- Similar to Dropbox). This means that all photos uploaded from your iPhone will be on your computer.
 
Lol...

"Cookies are disabled
Your browser's cookies seem to be disabled. Ads Settings will not work until you enable cookies in your browser. "

What were you trying to show with that link?

If you are logged into Google that just shows you the ad profile they have built about you. It's really quite vague and not at all as invasive as most people here would have you believe.

Eg: http://mashable.com/2012/01/25/google-cookies/
 
There's a Mac Google Photos app ( https://photos.google.com/apps -- click 'Desktop Uploader').

When you've downloaded this, you can select what folders you want backed up (including iPhoto Library).

Also, if you log in to Google Drive from a browser on your Mac, it should ask if you want to include Google Photos into your Google Drive folder (if you have it on your Mac -- Similar to Dropbox). This means that all photos uploaded from your iPhone will be on your computer.

This is actually incorrect. The iPhoto library is not seen by the OS as a folder, but instead as a package, which is treated as a file....so I doubt the uploader would work on its contents. iPhoto, as well as Aperture, can be configured to keeps its contents outside of the library...but this is not how it's setup by default.
 
If you are logged into Google that just shows you the ad profile they have built about you. It's really quite vague and not at all as invasive as most people here would have you believe.

Log into Google? For what?

And I doubt that profile shows everything they have on their customers.


Personally, I'm not as fired up about Google or any other private sector company having something as I am about the NSA having everything or even something. And if Google has it, the NSA has it in turn, according to Julian Assange. If the feds didn't exist as we know them today, I'd be a bit more relaxed around Google or any other company, but I still have a problem with any company knowing anything about me, regardless of the feds or not. I value my privacy.
 
This is actually incorrect. The iPhoto library is not seen by the OS as a folder, but instead as a package, which is treated as a file....so I doubt the uploader would work on its contents. iPhoto, as well as Aperture, can be configured to keeps its contents outside of the library...but this is not how it's setup by default.

I know what you're saying, but Google has worked around that. When you select 'iPhoto Library', it uploads what's in your iPhoto Library. NOTE: I did not 'Add' the iPhoto Library to the list -- It was there automatically.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-05-30 at 12.49.50 pm.png
    Screen Shot 2015-05-30 at 12.49.50 pm.png
    85.1 KB · Views: 111
I know what you're saying, but Google has worked around that. When you select 'iPhoto Library', it uploads what's in your iPhoto Library. NOTE: I did not 'Add' the iPhoto Library to the list -- It was there automatically.

OMG I hope you're right, I just got wood.
 
I know what you're saying, but Google has worked around that. When you select 'iPhoto Library', it uploads what's in your iPhoto Library. NOTE: I did not 'Add' the iPhoto Library to the list -- It was there automatically.

and by library does that mean just the photos or every album, smart album, folders, sets etc?
 
Log into Google? For what?

And I doubt that profile shows everything they have on their customers.


Personally, I'm not as fired up about Google or any other private sector company having something as I am about the NSA having everything or even something. And if Google has it, the NSA has it in turn, according to Julian Assange. If the feds didn't exist as we know them today, I'd be a bit more relaxed around Google or any other company, but I still have a problem with any company knowing anything about me, regardless of the feds or not. I value my privacy.
Sounds like staying away from the Internet would be the way to go. In fact from almost any communication method and probably down to even not having power or water supplied by anyone.
 
Every Android version is named after a type of candy, going through the alphabet.

Froyo, Gingerbread, Honeycomb, Ice Cream Sandwich, Jelly Bean, KitKat, Lollipop...

They're now on "M" but haven't announced the actual name. The same thing happened last year - they announced "Android L" before they called it Lollipop.

With OS X, the X should be pronounced "ten" because its a roman numeral. To imply Google is copying Apple by using a letter in their name is clutching at straws.

Thanks for explaining this to me. I stand corrected
 
Sounds like staying away from the Internet would be the way to go. In fact from almost any communication method and probably down to even not having power or water supplied by anyone.

Very true, especially on that last item. Power/water usage can and has been used to develop spurious drug warrants against people and result in no-knock raids, sometimes resulting in severe injury, loss of life, and confiscation of property, all at no risk to the "professionals" involved.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.