Can you point to one that says they don't?![]()
When a claim is made and then support is asked for it, turning around and asking to disprove it doesn't provide support to that claim (and generally only undermines the claim actually).
Can you point to one that says they don't?![]()
Well of course all ad services run like this, Facebook's, Yahoo's, Google, Apple. The different is this is a tiny amount of Apple's massive multi billion revenue, where as 90% of Google's is from marketing, advertising, data mining etc.
Its also pretty easy to opt out of iAd data mining and still use all of Apple's products, you don't have that option with Googles stuff as its how they make their money.
Here you go
To be fair, I was slightly wrong, the interviewer said Google, and then Tim went on to talk about companies who's main source of income is collecting personal data (eg Google)
Is there a way of hooking up Photos on OS X as the interface for this?
Love native apps, but also would love unlimited photo storage. Can't tell which of these loves will win, but if theres a way of pointing Photos towards Google, that'd be great.![]()
Thanks for pointing out again that people don't get what the word "product" really means.
Of course is Apple also using their information about users. The difference is that all (almost) of Google's products are about personal information gathering and analyzing.
Apple on the other hand is actually getting some money from selling iPhones.
You think Apple's safer on that front?
good lord, how can Apple still justify charging for storage of photos and videos when Flickr and Google will do unlimited for free?
I guess the question is, what's the catch?
I have a feeling that iCloud Photo library will morph into something similar to this, we may hear more about that at WWDC next month.
I/ suppose that those laughs is because you think Google sell information. If so, can you point to any source that proves your claim?
The NSA scares me, but Google scares me even more.
Why anybody thinks handing over even more of their personal data to Google is a good idea is beyond me.
I'd like to hear Jennifer Lawrence's opinion on that.
Pretty much any personal service on the internet is scary on that level in that case.The NSA scares me, but Google scares me even more.
Why anybody thinks handing over even more of their personal data to Google is a good idea is beyond me.
Well, for a brute force attack to work in most cases would mean that some safeguards that should be there weren't or weren't working, which was the case with Apple. And whatever data Apple has that it can get to it will also hand over to the government if/when it's required to. So it's not exactly that one is somehow really better or worse than the other in a general sense.Brute force attack vs. Company that gladly hands over data to the gov't. Interesting comparison...
Google + my photos = never going to happen
considering the iPhone only got 8 MP i am fairly certain people dont care
you may want to read what it does again
Its funny, people complain about the government, Google literally manipulates search results and news to secure political outcomes.
TWhy anybody thinks handing over even more of their personal data to Google is a good idea is beyond me.
Google + my photos = never going to happen