why is xbox live better than PSN?
i have a 360 but not a ps3
For a number of reasons.
1. each game MUST have some form of online component. PS3 games do not
2. you have a standardized service which works pretty much the same for every game you play.
3. you have the choice of gamer zones, which does indeed effect the amount of smack talk dependent on the zone you choose.
4. you can sign on, a friend sees that you have come online and can send you a request to play the game.... the PS3 can not do this at all. The PS3 will annoyingly tell you someone has signed on, but indeed to send them a message or communicate with them at all, you must leave your game. Really annoying to be honest, I ended up turning notifications off on the PS3 because you cant do anything with them, other than feel frustrated.
5. gamerscores - love them or hate them. The majority however seem to love them. Having a comparative gamerscore for your Arcade title compared to your friend can create great competition.
6. voice. Quite simply the 360 online has far better voice support in all its games, and it is used very often on online sessions. Whereas PS3 PSN voice support is again left to developers to implement, some don't bother, and some make it so cumbersome or bug ridden that most online gaming sessions on PS3 often feel like bot battles because no one is interacting with each other. This is most annoying in tactical games, when your in a squad and there is zero communication. It can kill the atmosphere totally.
7. Clan support. Quite simply there is far more 'clan' support out there based on 360 and LIVE than there is in PSN. Clan's may not be everyones cup of tea, but they certainly can be fun and addictive.
8. Demos. Sure the PSN has online demo's, but in comparison to the 360 it is constantly playing catch up. Quite often the demo hits 360 Marketplace, but PS3 users are left waiting weeks, months if anything turns up at all. That can be annoying. Most people want to try a game before it's released, not 6 months after its been on the shelves.
I could go on.... but you get the point.
PSN is great because it's free, but offers in comparison a very stripped down package and one that has GLARING omissions. It is very much Generation 1 of Sony's online mission
LIVE is more mature, offers a broader and more complete package, and if providing that service costs $50 a year..... Then the 6 million 360 owners who have gold accounts must think it provides something of value.
If PSN improves and offers the same service and still costs nothing, then we may have somthing to grumble about, but until then people need to stop bitching about LIVE. It is OPTIONAL after all
Maybe you should just make a list of all the games you like (current + upcoming) and decide which system accommodates you the best, then go with that.
I said somthing similar back on page one
So... I keep haring people say "Live is better, live is better, live is better." That's been said about 40 times in this thread, and no one has stated why.
I can't type that fast Oni
