Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Only in the US IMessage is winning, for the vast majority of the earth population both RCS and IMessage are outdated, caveman technologies that people couldn’t care less about.

The true winner is WhatsApp
Aren't iMessage and WhatsApp, Signal etc the same thing though. They're sms alternative proprietary apps. If Apple were to create an Android version it could challenge Whatsapp as the most popular messaging app. Either way luckily there's alternatives for all users. I have no problem using Whatsapp and other messaging apps across my devices.
 
I live in both camps. Typing this on a Pixel phone, a phone that also has iMessage thanks to 3rd party tools.

While I love the feature set of RCS, it isn't exactly prime time just yet.

  • People will drop out of group chats without actually intending to,
Screenshot_20231009-223223.png

  • End to end encryption drops for unknown reasons.
Screenshot_20231009-223240~2.png

  • Sometimes a single user can cause a chain reaction that just kills a chat, or unknowingly causes someone to be ghosted and miss a huge portion of a group conversation before mysteriously reappearing out of nowhere.
Can't count how many times I have dove into message settings on my device to see if my bone stock Pixel was causing an issue in RCS, or, reviewed screenshots of other people's devices to attempt and troubleshoot them .

RCS is great when it works, but gives me nightmares of 90s AOL messaging with a friend using an unreliable Internet connection.
 
There is another reason I personally don't want Apple to adopt RCS, at least for now. I believe iMessage is still a very strong reason for choosing and staying within the Apple ecosystem, and the more users the ecosystem has, the stronger/more reliable it is. Google provides a nice competitive force that keeps Apple at bay - but let's be honest, the ecosystem is far behind, and that's the reason Android users get shamed on a regular basis. I hear even folks at Google use iPhones because, to quote something I heard from a former Google employee, "you are not getting a date in the bay area if your texts come through in green".
 
Use Telegram.
USA is the only place where imessage is succesful.
Lack of Interoperability with other ecosystems killed Blackberry.
imessage is the Internet Explorer of the 90s but worse...
 
These ads help the governmet to make laws. Off course Apple cares nothing, but the more noise it raises, the more the regulators will pay attention
 
This isn't about RCS - they can create something new if needsbe. It's not solely about imessage either. It's the fact that there's now lots of siloed messaging apps that don't interoperate, and in 2023 we can do better than SMS. As a user I welcome this.

For example, I'd love to use Signal but noone I know uses it so it's pointless. If it could interoperate with other services I could try it, and other messaging clients too. That would also open up the market for new messaging apps to join.
IMG_0096.jpeg
 
Why are people so anti RCS? Not everyone wants an iPhone, and outside of the US no one uses imessage, heck the only sms messages I get are 2 factor.
 
I just enjoy how mad it makes people who buy an Android.

It’s like people who buy a massive SUV and then complain about gas prices. You knew what you were signing up for and now are mad that this obvious consequence to your actions exists?
Sigh… I seriously can’t comprehend statements like this. You act like every iPhone owner only knows and interacts with other iPhone owners!? It makes me mad as well, I know several people who owns Android phones, and it IS seriously annoying that I have to use other chat services to text them to come even close to the iMessage experience between iPhones. I know iOS holds a bigger share in the US, but it’s the same story here in Sweden. But there’s still like 40-45% Android owners in both of our countries. This is just Apple being Apple… Just look at USB-C… It took Europe (EU) basically forcing them to adopt it on the iPhones.
 
RCS as it exists all runs though google’s servers and the encryption extension is a closed proprietary Google library. Even when encrypted, Google can scrape all the message metadata and see attachments. This would increase google’s spying by a lot.

The encryption is not "a closed proprietary Google library"

It uses the Signal protocol which is open-source and quite well-audited

RCS E2EE whitepaper
 
I have an amazingly stupid question, why does Samsung even care? I mean aside from the bubble color, and the occasional group chat in Messages, it's not like Android users can't text Apple users. I mean, half of my friends are on various flavor of Android, and we text just fine.
One example is that Apple has the MMS file size limit set extraordinarily low so sending videos or any large media to Android devices results in an extremely compressed mess and a poor user experience. Most modern Android devices (and carriers) support much higher MMS size limits, and RCS/iMessage support significantly higher attachment limits.

Because Apple doesn't want to support RCS or allow modern attachment sizes, they have intentionally created a poor user experience for anyone not using their proprietary and OS-locked messaging service for basic messaging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fabsgwu
It's so shocking how people here are genuinely opposed to better interactions between iPhones and Androids. I don't understand that. SMS is terribly limited and outdated, and not E2E encrypted. And it's not like Androids are going away, so why keep the experience this bad on iMessages?

Not that I think this ad campaign will have any effect on Apple at all, but that doesn't mean that Apple should do nothing on improving communication standards on iPhone
What is bad about the current implementation of iMessage? iMessage is fantastic. Are you referring to the implementation of green bubbles? That's nothing to do with iMessage, that's texts.

Also, I'm happy with Apples communications standards, thanks. Keep them as far away from Googles hands and their spyware.

If Google and Android want the iMessage experience, they can start promoting iPhones, so they, and all their customers can enjoy it👍
 
It's so shocking how people here are genuinely opposed to better interactions between iPhones and Androids. I don't understand that. SMS is terribly limited and outdated, and not E2E encrypted. And it's not like Androids are going away, so why keep the experience this bad on iMessages?

Not that I think this ad campaign will have any effect on Apple at all, but that doesn't mean that Apple should do nothing on improving communication standards on iPhone
Shocked at the quality of commenters on macrumors, new here?
 
It’s just capitalism and zero regulations at play.

Why does anyone, including Samsung, expect this to change without intervention from a government?

iMessage being an Apple exclusive is a major asset to Apple. Of course they’ll never willingly give it up.
 
Well in a way this is about the superiority of chat apps such as WhatsApp, Signal and iMessage over SMS. They all do the same thing, using your email and or phone number as a global ID with which other details are associated, allowing them to transfer rich sets of content over end-to-end encrypted channels.

But SMS has never really tried to catch up with those proprietary messaging protocols. They’ve been behind for a long time, and RCS is the first serious attempt in many years to formulate an open standard.

I don’t see any of the big proprietary players giving up their advantage to level the playing field with the smaller players. At least not voluntarily.
 
To all the people hating RCS and android here, I wonder if you realize that absolutely no one outside the US uses IMessage, people out there use WhatsApp/wechat/Line/Telegram/Signal/whatever, literally anything EXCEPT iMessage/SMS,so everyone gets along very well except people in the US that love judging their relationships based on the phone others use.

As for IMessage they may as well remove it for people outside the US, the only reason it isn’t is because SMS are still needed to verify some accounts.

This dumb debate is pointless for 90% of people.
Exactly, that's why the EU has no reason to consider iMessage a monopoly and force them to adopt other protocols, because as you said, iMessage is barely used in the EU so it's far from being a "gatekeeper".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.