Right! Even the thought of it sounds so unprofessional. What happened to making eye contact during the presentation? We will be relying on looking at some avatar?Well if your wearing a AR/VR headset your face can’t be seen. Still no one should attend a FaceTime conference wearing that $2000 headset in the first place IMHO, but in virtual worlds your whole body could be some form of avatar, just not a emoji.![]()
If someone is so self conscience that their are concealing with an avatar in a business meeting, that tells me enough that this person is not leadership material. Same goes for dating or anything else. Enough said.Well if your wearing a AR/VR headset your face can’t be seen. Still no one should attend a FaceTime conference wearing that $2000 headset in the first place IMHO, but in virtual worlds your whole body could be some form of avatar, just not a emoji.![]()
It’s a gimmick like Memoji’s. It’s fun to try and play funny games with children and then after the novelty wears out quickly.Right! Even the thought of it sounds so unprofessional. What happened to making eye contact during the presentation? We will be relying on looking at some avatar?
It's a distraction, trying to figure out what the other person looks like. Is Memoji is what’s it going to take to impress Tim Cook?
My guess would be airmat or whatever that wireless charging thing was called…LOL $2000 VR Memojis, looks are Apple VR will be a huge success, just like the HomePod.
/s
Yeah I remember, that Apple charging mattress that never got released.My guess would be airmat or whatever that wireless charging thing was called…
I understand these limits, but I think it can be solved via software.Even if they managed to solve this by AI-stitching the feed from 4 cameras (2 inward cameras in the inside and 2 external lower cameras on the outer shell pointed slightly inwards), you would still
- miss the part of the face pressed against the memory foam cushion around the headset
- have a tricky situation in terms of different lighting of the enclosed part of your face vs the bottom part of the face
Whereas detecting in broad terms the facial muscles movements via TrueDepth/LiDAR and transferring them to the Memoji poses none of these problems.
So software is going to fill in CHUNKS of missing facial data, got it. ?I understand these limits, but I think it can be solved via software.
Memojis. First keyboard setting I turned off as soon as it was possible.
Memojis in a VR setting? Sure,, if Apple makes a program that can determine my features much faster via camera than I can by looking.
I just don’t see this product ever being more the a HomePod level experiment that goes the same way. We will get a watered down version years later and it’ll be ignored from there forward.
I pity parents of kids who'll be whiny about not having one.Wow, $2000 for a memoji headset...Yikes
I cannot see VR in its current clunky form factor to sell as much volume as a Mac much less an iPhone.
I doubt Apple does or expect that to happen either. If they position it as a high price add on for artists, scientists etc they may move enough to afford R\D on it but that’s a big maybe. Think the 3D modeling in Jurassic Park…
Which kind of shows your lack of understanding if you’re comparing an AR/VR headset to an iPhone. Totally different use cases that don’t even belong in the same category. Is this a niche product? Absolutely. Apple knows that. But we don’t know where they’re gearing this product and how they will market it. There has to be another level of usefulness for a product like this other than just ‘Memojis’, like in the professional standard for training with the likes of surgical training procedures, automotive dynamics, engineering design, etc.I cannot see VR in its current clunky form factor to sell as much volume as a Mac much less an iPhone.