Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well if your wearing a AR/VR headset your face can’t be seen. Still no one should attend a FaceTime conference wearing that $2000 headset in the first place IMHO, but in virtual worlds your whole body could be some form of avatar, just not a emoji. :)
Right! Even the thought of it sounds so unprofessional. What happened to making eye contact during the presentation? We will be relying on looking at some avatar?

It's a distraction, trying to figure out what the other person looks like. Is Memoji is what’s it going to take to impress Tim Cook?
 
Well if your wearing a AR/VR headset your face can’t be seen. Still no one should attend a FaceTime conference wearing that $2000 headset in the first place IMHO, but in virtual worlds your whole body could be some form of avatar, just not a emoji. :)
If someone is so self conscience that their are concealing with an avatar in a business meeting, that tells me enough that this person is not leadership material. Same goes for dating or anything else. Enough said.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: arkitect and 4nNtt
Right! Even the thought of it sounds so unprofessional. What happened to making eye contact during the presentation? We will be relying on looking at some avatar?

It's a distraction, trying to figure out what the other person looks like. Is Memoji is what’s it going to take to impress Tim Cook?
It’s a gimmick like Memoji’s. It’s fun to try and play funny games with children and then after the novelty wears out quickly.

I thank everyone who purchases this expensive paperweight, my Apple stock needs a boost. 😁
 
My guess would be airmat or whatever that wireless charging thing was called…
Yeah I remember, that Apple charging mattress that never got released.
Must be rocket science or Nokia just came from outer world.

iu
 
Is anyone asking for any of this?

I can’t seem me wanting it or using it.

Also, how’s the headset going to see your whole face to show full emotions? FaceTime gets to see your full face but a AR headset covers your eyes. Will it have LiDAR on the inside and one pointing at your mouth too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Even if they managed to solve this by AI-stitching the feed from 4 cameras (2 inward cameras in the inside and 2 external lower cameras on the outer shell pointed slightly inwards), you would still
- miss the part of the face pressed against the memory foam cushion around the headset
- have a tricky situation in terms of different lighting of the enclosed part of your face vs the bottom part of the face

Whereas detecting in broad terms the facial muscles movements via TrueDepth/LiDAR and transferring them to the Memoji poses none of these problems.
I understand these limits, but I think it can be solved via software.
 
Aside from a cool few VR games I've tried, I struggle to find how VR has so much hype? It's the classic solution desperately searching for a problem. Even the few games I played I'd rather play with a controller and TV or mouse and keyboard.

Maybe Apple has seen the future and we will be amazed by it but I feel like this is a bunch of executives trying desperately to come up with the next big thing and its just not working.
 
Memojis. First keyboard setting I turned off as soon as it was possible.

You're thinking emojis, not memoji. Two different things.

Everyone is shooting down the idea of memojis, but there's some very good reasons for using that over a video stream. Only "instructions" need to be sent between parties, which can be highly compressed, so super efficient.

Once a 3-D face is loaded, the rest is just orientation and modification instructions, such as winks and smiles.

I applaud Apple for thinking different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthogag
I can't even make a life like memoji of me to even begin using it online and I'm not going to spend an hour fiddling with the Memoji interface just to have something other than my already beautiful face to be available.. why not just use AI to fake a face?

Memojis in a VR setting? Sure,, if Apple makes a program that can determine my features much faster via camera than I can by looking.

Are we excluding blind people from the VR adventure? I think that's cultural appropriation and racist HAHAHA

edit.. I'm an idiot and don't not anyone tell me any different. m'kay
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Jensend
Well, no one here has an idea of what exactly Apple could do with this and how it’s incorporated. I do think there is some ‘entertainment value’ here, it’s probably one of the many side capabilities that this headset might be capable of. But why don’t we wait and see before everybody lambastes it, but then again, it’s the popular Internet thing to do.
 
I just don’t see this product ever being more the a HomePod level experiment that goes the same way. We will get a watered down version years later and it’ll be ignored from there forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adarna
Memojis in a VR setting? Sure,, if Apple makes a program that can determine my features much faster via camera than I can by looking.

Good idea. Can totally see them using AI to automatically generate Memojis!
 
Last edited:
I just don’t see this product ever being more the a HomePod level experiment that goes the same way. We will get a watered down version years later and it’ll be ignored from there forward.

I cannot see VR in its current clunky form factor to sell as much volume as a Mac much less an iPhone.
 
I cannot see VR in its current clunky form factor to sell as much volume as a Mac much less an iPhone.


I doubt Apple does or expect that to happen either. If they position it as a high price add on for artists, scientists etc they may move enough to afford R\D on it but that’s a big maybe. Think the 3D modeling in Jurassic Park…
 
I doubt Apple does or expect that to happen either. If they position it as a high price add on for artists, scientists etc they may move enough to afford R\D on it but that’s a big maybe. Think the 3D modeling in Jurassic Park…

Odds are I wouldn't buy one until say the 10th anniversary of its release.
 
I cannot see VR in its current clunky form factor to sell as much volume as a Mac much less an iPhone.
Which kind of shows your lack of understanding if you’re comparing an AR/VR headset to an iPhone. Totally different use cases that don’t even belong in the same category. Is this a niche product? Absolutely. Apple knows that. But we don’t know where they’re gearing this product and how they will market it. There has to be another level of usefulness for a product like this other than just ‘Memojis’, like in the professional standard for training with the likes of surgical training procedures, automotive dynamics, engineering design, etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.