What about the Mac Pro though? We are already past the self-imposed “2 year transition” to Apple Silicon and still no Mac Pro. I wonder if they’re waiting on 3nm silicon.
Keep in mind who we’re really talking about when we say “Pro.” It’s not Youtubers who capture and cut all their own content with what most people would consider high-end cameras ($5000K mirroless still/video cams). We’re talking about people who are sitting in front of the computer all day, using it for 6-8 hours of high-bandwidth, high computational-load use cases. That’s scientists crunching on data sets measured in terabytes, photographers (or scientists) working on single images measured in 100s of gigabytes, and VFX experts who are creating CGI or complex composites of the most dense of digital film formats.
Max-spec’d M1 Macbook Pros hardly serve these people. The Mac Studio is somewhat of a stop-gap, but still won’t serve all of these pros either. These pros don’t care about performance per watt. They only care about getting **** done fast.
Unless Apple is conceding these pros will forever be out of reach of their current technology development trajectory, I would expect Apple not to take this lightly. Not to mention, Apple is under a lot of pressure to continue exceeding expectations like they did with Apple Silicon in the first place. They are going to be both aggressive in their goals to meet “pro” needs, and cautious in releasing a new high-priced Pro solution that doesn’t.
While the current generation of Apple Silicon
CPU performance per core smokes Intel, it is not that far ahead of the curve on either core count or
GPU performance. And this is where software for “pros” is getting all of its power today. And, this is where both the 2019 Mac Pro and Apple Silicon have stiff competition from commodity workstation hardware on the other side of the platform divide (read: PCs using Intel / AMD).
I think the big limiters for Apple with SoCs are going to be scaling for RAM and GPU compute. Commodity hardware has it beat in both (again, ignoring power consumption). And just smashing two Ultras together as is rumored for the “extreme,” and then calling it good for the next four to six years won’t make the grade.
My completely far-fetched un-knowing industry-outsider conjecture (all for funsies) for the next-gen Mac Pro:
- It gets its very own SoC
- or at least one that doesn’t become available in lesser offerings for at least a year or more
- It is clocked significantly higher than M1, M2, or Mac Studio implementations,
- That the entry level doubles the CPU and GPU core count of the highest-end Mac Studio config
- The base memory config is 128GB, and is configurable up to 512GB+
- It’s enclosure is only slightly smaller than the current Mac Pro tower
- 50% of the enclosure is filled by cooling apparatus
- Apple begins iterating and releasing Mac Pro spec bumps every year or two in roughly the same cadence as the rest of its product line.