1. tripsync claims to have worked at Apple (engineer, not desc marketing, finance, etc.) so at least has 'some level' of qualification for his opinion, even if many/most disagree.
And doesn’t any more, so take sour grapes opinion for what it is…
1. tripsync claims to have worked at Apple (engineer, not desc marketing, finance, etc.) so at least has 'some level' of qualification for his opinion, even if many/most disagree.
If a future MacOS can in reality cover both.... why would they 'back port both ways' with macOS -> iPadOS when they already have ported IOS/iPadOS bits into macOS?
Nope. Air gestures are not implemented system wide.
Maybe theyll just release an updated keyboard that’s compatible with current iPads and we can buy that and feel upgraded enough for a couple more years
Yep, we are. Certainly some additional services and core details would need to be sorted (I have no idea if IOS has SIP for example but there will be more). Like you said, no reboots required, even better.They’ve ported some of the APIs back to macOS, but iOS and iPadOS still have additional security features that are not quite backported.
I think we’re both talking about the same thing really. Eventually the core frameworks will be the same on both platforms and the UI will be flicked over in real time because the OS (whichever name it adopts) will include both.
No reboot required; the way the Apple frameworks work, it would be a case of changing the already dynamic dispatch routing from one UI to another; no OS restart and not even an app restart required.
So let's say Apple never developed keyboard/curser input for iPad devices and those resources are freed up. What sorts of things would you add (if any) to the iPad to get it where you feel it should be?
No, the argument you presented was that NOBODY could do it, which is trivially not true. Optimal or not is a separate discussion.What kind of work is that?
Browser... sure, you can use it on iPad, but it's more an iOS experience than proper macOS Safari, especially if you want to work efficiently. Different windows, multiple tabs, maybe two desktops. Sure, you can do this on an iPad, but you could also do it on an iPhone with a wireless keyboard. The argument here is - is it really optimal?
That’s one of the reasons it would be nice if the MK could rotate iPad to portrait orientation.I think people are referring to the front facing camera. Though unless Apple reworks how the Apple Pencil attaches to the iPad currently, I don’t see its position changing, since both are basically fighting for the same space on your iPad Pro.
Your use of the term “real work” illustrates the point I was making. “Real work” according to whom? Is an artist drawing with an Apple Pencil in Procreate not doing “real work”? Or how about the musician creating tracks in Logic Pro for iPad?
I’m not saying this is you, but many PC centric people think of “real work” as spreadsheets, coding and such. Or perhaps even video editing, while dismissing artistic tasks as mere frivolities.
Lest we forget, pilots, real estate showrooms and writers, etc. do “real work” on iPad which can be done without necessarily adding an external keyboard, and it suits them just fine.
Doesn't even really need to be scaled down. An IPP is basically a touchscreen MBA at this point. There is no need to scale down MacOS on an MBA and the hardware is the same. Run macOS as is, provide touch-first (Springboard) when not docked and have the option for either Springboard or Mac desktop when docked. Allow iPad apps to be windows seamlessly in MacOS when docked (you know, like Mac does already).This right here is the biggest problem. Throw Accessory after Acessory and make it more powerful with a new cpu and ram and it won't matter if iPadOS keeps being put on it. I honestly used to think that since the iPads back before the pro was launched that they needed to scale up iOS because the iPads weren't that powerful and that is the type of architecture that iOS was built for. Now that the iPad pros are here and the architecture inside is so much more powerful and wasted, i'm now convinced they must quit trying to upscale iOS and get rid of it but instead scale down MacOS to work on a touch tablet. Leave iOS to phones and a scaled down version of MacOS to iPad.
Doesn't even really need to be scaled down. An IPP is basically a touchscreen MBA at this point. There is no need to scale down MacOS on an MBA and the hardware is the same. Run macOS as is, provide touch-first (Springboard) when not docked and have the option for either Springboard or Mac desktop when docked. Allow iPad apps to be windows seamlessly in MacOS when docked (you know, like Mac does already).
As the iPad Pros are becoming more expensive every year whilst M1/M2 Macbooks are becoming cheaper, the iPad Pro as a laptop replacement is increasingly looking like a bad deal if you include the cost of a keyboard case + USB dongle.This right here is the biggest problem. Throw Accessory after Acessory and make it more powerful with a new cpu and ram and it won't matter if iPadOS keeps being put on it. I honestly used to think that since the iPads back before the pro was launched that they needed to scale up iOS because the iPads weren't that powerful and that is the type of architecture that iOS was built for. Now that the iPad pros are here and the architecture inside is so much more powerful and wasted, i'm now convinced they must quit trying to upscale iOS and get rid of it but instead scale down MacOS to work on a touch tablet. Leave iOS to phones and a scaled down version of MacOS to iPad.
If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.While the idea of macOS on the iPad sounds nice, I think they could further refine features like Stage Manager to make the iPad more capable. The Magic Keyboard makes a huge difference when using the iPad and an improved version (with an escape and ‘function’ keys!) would be awesome. For me, the iPad is my travel device: great for flights, smaller and more durable (with keyboard) than a MacBook and able to perform everything* I need for work.
*Yeah, some instances where workarounds and hopping between multiple apps for a simple macOS task can be tedious. JetBrains should just make an iPad version of their desktop apps.
While the idea of macOS on the iPad sounds nice, I think they could further refine features like Stage Manager to make the iPad more capable.
See my previous post regarding reboots.If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.
Both have the same hardware. If the iPad could run OSX when docked or with an external monitor, I would not have to own a MacBook and thereby save a lot of money.
Completely.This.
With the ARM architecture on Mac - iPadOS is becoming more and more bizzare and useless with each passing month.
I would buy an iPad Pro in an instant if it ran macOS. Portable powerhouse, not only portable as 12'' Macbook used to be.
I believe revenue is the only issue. Currently (some) people have three devices (iPhone, iPad, Mac). We can still hope, that THIS is the new iPad Pro. It would be rather easy to make Pro tablets run macOS, while ordinary iPads still run iPad OS.
See my previous post regarding reboots.
MacOS and ipadOS will end up being the same thing essentially, and flick from one to the other UI in real time.
We’re not there yet and there’s further development and integration required by apple without breaking things on macOS too quickly, but that’s where things are headed.
macOS would be crap on the ipad as is - just like ipadOS would be crap on a macbook.
What’s coming is NOT dual boot.
Try using iPad in SideCar mode on macOS. It's not crap. It's nice and makes you wanna just take the iPad and the keyboard and go.
I do every day.
Rebooting into a different OS is crap. I did it for a decade.
There already IS an upgraded Stage Manger. It's called Mission Control on macOS. And it's perfect for multitasking, even across multiple desktops.
This is getting bizzare. iPad users requesting features, which have been available on macOS for more than a decade and at the same time defending the usability of iPadOS.
If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.
Both have the same hardware. If the iPad could run OSX when docked or with an external monitor, I would not have to own a MacBook and thereby save a lot of money.
Yes. The challenge is figuring out how to merge the two....or should I see three if we include VisionOS?See my previous post regarding reboots.
MacOS and ipadOS will end up being the same thing essentially, and flick from one to the other UI in real time.
We’re not there yet and there’s further development and integration required by apple without breaking things on macOS too quickly, but that’s where things are headed.
macOS would be crap on the ipad as is - just like ipadOS would be crap on a macbook.
What’s coming is NOT dual boot.
Excellent point. The most apps that run in the cloud and use Apis, the easier it will be to merge macos and ipad os versus dual booting with content stored locally in different partitionts - posing security risks in getting the two partitions to sync and talk to eachother.VisionOS will be easy to merge in as there’s no history of legacy applications to not break. Everything on that is already using the latest APIs. This is why iOS apps already run on VisionOS just fine.