Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If a future MacOS can in reality cover both.... why would they 'back port both ways' with macOS -> iPadOS when they already have ported IOS/iPadOS bits into macOS?

They’ve ported some of the APIs back to macOS, but iOS and iPadOS still have additional security features that are not quite backported.

I think we’re both talking about the same thing really. Eventually the core frameworks will be the same on both platforms and the UI will be flicked over in real time because the OS (whichever name it adopts) will include both.

No reboot required; the way the Apple frameworks work, it would be a case of changing the already dynamic dispatch routing from one UI to another; no OS restart and not even an app restart required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r and wegster
They’ve ported some of the APIs back to macOS, but iOS and iPadOS still have additional security features that are not quite backported.

I think we’re both talking about the same thing really. Eventually the core frameworks will be the same on both platforms and the UI will be flicked over in real time because the OS (whichever name it adopts) will include both.

No reboot required; the way the Apple frameworks work, it would be a case of changing the already dynamic dispatch routing from one UI to another; no OS restart and not even an app restart required.
Yep, we are. Certainly some additional services and core details would need to be sorted (I have no idea if IOS has SIP for example but there will be more). Like you said, no reboots required, even better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r and throAU
So let's say Apple never developed keyboard/curser input for iPad devices and those resources are freed up. What sorts of things would you add (if any) to the iPad to get it where you feel it should be?

Multitouch is incredibly limiting and outdated. Improvements to it would be the obvious thing to do for a touch first device.
 
What kind of work is that?

Browser... sure, you can use it on iPad, but it's more an iOS experience than proper macOS Safari, especially if you want to work efficiently. Different windows, multiple tabs, maybe two desktops. Sure, you can do this on an iPad, but you could also do it on an iPhone with a wireless keyboard. The argument here is - is it really optimal?
No, the argument you presented was that NOBODY could do it, which is trivially not true. Optimal or not is a separate discussion.
 
I think people are referring to the front facing camera. Though unless Apple reworks how the Apple Pencil attaches to the iPad currently, I don’t see its position changing, since both are basically fighting for the same space on your iPad Pro.
That’s one of the reasons it would be nice if the MK could rotate iPad to portrait orientation.
 
Your use of the term “real work” illustrates the point I was making. “Real work” according to whom? Is an artist drawing with an Apple Pencil in Procreate not doing “real work”? Or how about the musician creating tracks in Logic Pro for iPad?

I’m not saying this is you, but many PC centric people think of “real work” as spreadsheets, coding and such. Or perhaps even video editing, while dismissing artistic tasks as mere frivolities.

Lest we forget, pilots, real estate showrooms and writers, etc. do “real work” on iPad which can be done without necessarily adding an external keyboard, and it suits them just fine.

Real life is not an Apple promo video.

You made a great example for my point, however. Artists, pilots, real estate agents... they all use iPads how they were originally meant to be used - as a paper replacement, with touch interface only.


I think that nowadays 1% of people actually use iPads like this. The rest simply put up with compromises that iPad OS brings and use the wrong device for their tasks. Now thay can attach an expensive keyboard with trackpad and believe they have a Macbook.

And yeah, real work is, in a far greater percentage, manipulating text or numbers with computers. iPad OS is useless for this. Can you name a company, where workers use iPads exclusively?


The term "This is a classic case of listening to the customer who is wrong." is just perfect here.

Instead of a great and fun tool, Apple is now morphing into Android / Microsoft state of mind. Quite sad in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tripsync
This right here is the biggest problem. Throw Accessory after Acessory and make it more powerful with a new cpu and ram and it won't matter if iPadOS keeps being put on it. I honestly used to think that since the iPads back before the pro was launched that they needed to scale up iOS because the iPads weren't that powerful and that is the type of architecture that iOS was built for. Now that the iPad pros are here and the architecture inside is so much more powerful and wasted, i'm now convinced they must quit trying to upscale iOS and get rid of it but instead scale down MacOS to work on a touch tablet. Leave iOS to phones and a scaled down version of MacOS to iPad.
Doesn't even really need to be scaled down. An IPP is basically a touchscreen MBA at this point. There is no need to scale down MacOS on an MBA and the hardware is the same. Run macOS as is, provide touch-first (Springboard) when not docked and have the option for either Springboard or Mac desktop when docked. Allow iPad apps to be windows seamlessly in MacOS when docked (you know, like Mac does already).
 
Doesn't even really need to be scaled down. An IPP is basically a touchscreen MBA at this point. There is no need to scale down MacOS on an MBA and the hardware is the same. Run macOS as is, provide touch-first (Springboard) when not docked and have the option for either Springboard or Mac desktop when docked. Allow iPad apps to be windows seamlessly in MacOS when docked (you know, like Mac does already).

This.

With the ARM architecture on Mac - iPadOS is becoming more and more bizzare and useless with each passing month.

I would buy an iPad Pro in an instant if it ran macOS. Portable powerhouse, not only portable as 12'' Macbook used to be.


I believe revenue is the only issue. Currently (some) people have three devices (iPhone, iPad, Mac). We can still hope, that THIS is the new iPad Pro. It would be rather easy to make Pro tablets run macOS, while ordinary iPads still run iPad OS.
 
This right here is the biggest problem. Throw Accessory after Acessory and make it more powerful with a new cpu and ram and it won't matter if iPadOS keeps being put on it. I honestly used to think that since the iPads back before the pro was launched that they needed to scale up iOS because the iPads weren't that powerful and that is the type of architecture that iOS was built for. Now that the iPad pros are here and the architecture inside is so much more powerful and wasted, i'm now convinced they must quit trying to upscale iOS and get rid of it but instead scale down MacOS to work on a touch tablet. Leave iOS to phones and a scaled down version of MacOS to iPad.
As the iPad Pros are becoming more expensive every year whilst M1/M2 Macbooks are becoming cheaper, the iPad Pro as a laptop replacement is increasingly looking like a bad deal if you include the cost of a keyboard case + USB dongle.

If you want 256GB or 512GB storage then an IPP is even a worse deal as video editing on Macs support external storage.
 
While the idea of macOS on the iPad sounds nice, I think they could further refine features like Stage Manager to make the iPad more capable. The Magic Keyboard makes a huge difference when using the iPad and an improved version (with an escape and ‘function’ keys!) would be awesome. For me, the iPad is my travel device: great for flights, smaller and more durable (with keyboard) than a MacBook and able to perform everything* I need for work.

*Yeah, some instances where workarounds and hopping between multiple apps for a simple macOS task can be tedious. JetBrains should just make an iPad version of their desktop apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
While the idea of macOS on the iPad sounds nice, I think they could further refine features like Stage Manager to make the iPad more capable. The Magic Keyboard makes a huge difference when using the iPad and an improved version (with an escape and ‘function’ keys!) would be awesome. For me, the iPad is my travel device: great for flights, smaller and more durable (with keyboard) than a MacBook and able to perform everything* I need for work.

*Yeah, some instances where workarounds and hopping between multiple apps for a simple macOS task can be tedious. JetBrains should just make an iPad version of their desktop apps.
If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.

Both have the same hardware. If the iPad could run OSX when docked or with an external monitor, I would not have to own a MacBook and thereby save a lot of money.
 
While the idea of macOS on the iPad sounds nice, I think they could further refine features like Stage Manager to make the iPad more capable.

There already IS an upgraded Stage Manger. It's called Mission Control on macOS. And it's perfect for multitasking, even across multiple desktops.

This is getting bizzare. iPad users requesting features, which have been available on macOS for more than a decade and at the same time defending the usability of iPadOS.
 
If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.

Both have the same hardware. If the iPad could run OSX when docked or with an external monitor, I would not have to own a MacBook and thereby save a lot of money.
See my previous post regarding reboots.

MacOS and ipadOS will end up being the same thing essentially, and flick from one to the other UI in real time.

We’re not there yet and there’s further development and integration required by apple without breaking things on macOS too quickly, but that’s where things are headed.

macOS would be crap on the ipad as is - just like ipadOS would be crap on a macbook.

What’s coming is NOT dual boot.
 
This.

With the ARM architecture on Mac - iPadOS is becoming more and more bizzare and useless with each passing month.

I would buy an iPad Pro in an instant if it ran macOS. Portable powerhouse, not only portable as 12'' Macbook used to be.


I believe revenue is the only issue. Currently (some) people have three devices (iPhone, iPad, Mac). We can still hope, that THIS is the new iPad Pro. It would be rather easy to make Pro tablets run macOS, while ordinary iPads still run iPad OS.
Completely.

The iPad Pro is facing an existencial problem, is between the iPhone Pro (and pro max) and the MacBook Pro with ARM.

iPad Pro is becoming an Iphone without certain apps that are phone only, and without certain MacBook apps. Seats in the middle without the best of both worlds.

For the people with the 3 devices, more and more people are going down to actually just use two of them.

Apple needs to address this, or sales will continue to drop.

On my use case, I actually use a lot the iPad, but will never pay again more then 1k for one, can be easily replace by the phone (on bed) and for the MacBook (on the sofa).

The good new is that the iPad problems are in their core, software issues, so Apple can fix this.
 
See my previous post regarding reboots.

MacOS and ipadOS will end up being the same thing essentially, and flick from one to the other UI in real time.

We’re not there yet and there’s further development and integration required by apple without breaking things on macOS too quickly, but that’s where things are headed.

macOS would be crap on the ipad as is - just like ipadOS would be crap on a macbook.

What’s coming is NOT dual boot.

Try using iPad in SideCar mode on macOS. It's not crap. It's nice and makes you wanna just take the iPad and the keyboard and go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r and wegster
There already IS an upgraded Stage Manger. It's called Mission Control on macOS. And it's perfect for multitasking, even across multiple desktops.

This is getting bizzare. iPad users requesting features, which have been available on macOS for more than a decade and at the same time defending the usability of iPadOS.

macOS wasn’t designed for a touch device. There needs to be a balance between the transition from keyboard-docked to handheld that isn’t jarring. It’s a problem specific to iPad and I don’t think that simply slapping macOS on the iPad is an elegant solution.

Also, even when I’m using the keyboard, I’ll mix touch and trackpad use. That’s usability I’ll defend.

If you own an M1/M2 MacBook and iPad Pro, there is unnecessary redundancy.

Both have the same hardware. If the iPad could run OSX when docked or with an external monitor, I would not have to own a MacBook and thereby save a lot of money.


I prefer owning both. They both excel in their own respect and a merged product wouldn’t necessarily suit me better.
 
See my previous post regarding reboots.

MacOS and ipadOS will end up being the same thing essentially, and flick from one to the other UI in real time.

We’re not there yet and there’s further development and integration required by apple without breaking things on macOS too quickly, but that’s where things are headed.

macOS would be crap on the ipad as is - just like ipadOS would be crap on a macbook.

What’s coming is NOT dual boot.
Yes. The challenge is figuring out how to merge the two....or should I see three if we include VisionOS?

I cant image spending £3000 just to see blown up iPhone apps on 3D. Yes I could use Apple Vision as a display for my MBP but really? Why should I have to carry around a £1500 computer to fully exploit a £3000 computer useful?

A computer within a computer?

#xhibitmeme

Therefore I believe that ipad, macos and Vision os must at some point be merged.
 
VisionOS will be easy to merge in as there’s no history of legacy applications to not break. Everything on that is already using the latest APIs. This is why iOS apps already run on VisionOS just fine.
 
VisionOS will be easy to merge in as there’s no history of legacy applications to not break. Everything on that is already using the latest APIs. This is why iOS apps already run on VisionOS just fine.
Excellent point. The most apps that run in the cloud and use Apis, the easier it will be to merge macos and ipad os versus dual booting with content stored locally in different partitionts - posing security risks in getting the two partitions to sync and talk to eachother.

Apple will figure it out. It's still early days as M1/M2 ipads are barely teo years old.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.