But reading the complaints so far, I just want to ask an honest question about multitasking.
Can someone please give me a example of a everyday practical use of multitasking? Cause I really have never WISHED for multitasking on the iPhone and the fact that without it makes the hardware run smoother is a bonus.
I don't really see the tears from no multitask cause when I use my full featured macbook pro what multitasks am I really using? The only time you need multitask is if you are doing WORK e.g have photoshop running while checking emails etc.
So please provide an example of a multitask use you would like that you cant do on the current OS.
Mutlitasking is everything on a machine like the Macbook Pro. For us Macbook Pros are workhorses. You want an example? How about everyday use. This includes email, running VMWare so we can tap into our Bloomberg proprietary accounts for business information, Adobe Acrobate Pro, Safari, and running Office 2008, both Word and Excel -- and this is just the minimum. (Note we use Mac Pros with dual screens in our offices, and our office runs on Apple pro products.)
We regularly create and give presentations to clients. This
requires using Keynote, Adobe Acrobat, Word, multiple spotlight searches for relevant photos and materials, on a Macbook Pro. Regular Macbooks don't come close to cutting it for us, too underpowered. We run topflight stuff, pro NEC monitors, decked out Mac Pros and Macbook Pros, etc. Again, this is the minimum.
Can't tell you the number of times I've used the Macbook Pro and target disk mode (firewire) to remotely access harddrives on desktop Pros and iMacs to do stuff, so useful.
iPad? I can't even begin to think what we would use it for. I can't even transfer files via USB to it. Waste. It's a glorified and underpowered webbrowser and Kindle.