It‘s true that Apple use the fastest RAM they can get their hands on.
Nonsense. They use the RAM that matches the specs of whatever standard Intel chipset the machine is built around. There are only about 3 actual DRAM chip manufacturers worldwide, so any 3rd party RAM you get is quite likely to have the exact same chips as Apple use.
For the machines that you
can upgrade, e.g. the 27"iMac:
Apple price for 8-16GB upgrade: $200
Crucial price for 16GB kit (that's 2x8GB sticks): $69.99
Just to re-iterate that, Apple charge $200 for an upgrade to 16GB, crucial charge $70 for an upgrade to 24GB.
When I upgraded my iMac, the Crucial sticks were, capacity aside, exactly the same brand of Micron SODIMMs as the ones that came with the iMac.
Have fun defending the indefensible.
Rolex know their particular customers will pay a premium price day or night.
Rolex make jewellery. The purpose of wearing a Rolex is to tell the world that you can afford a Rolex - if you want to tell the time, a $30 lump of plastic from Casio will do a
better job. Of course, its also a beautifully made, timeless, mechanical watch that you can hand down to your grandchildren, whereas a Mac is going to be clunky and obsolescent after 3-5 years and landfill within a decade.
Now imagine if a Rolex only told "Rolex time" and was only any use if third parties supported "Rolex time" in their timetables, TV schedules, store opening times etc. Then they started pushing up the price and - instead of trying to sell Rolexes to new customers - made do with extracting more and more cash from a handful of customers who simply wouldn't consider switching back to "regular time" and would pay whatever it took. That's going to be fine and dandy for a few quarters, until there are so few Rolex users that nobody bothers printing their diaries, schedules or opening times in 'Rolex time' anymore, and suddenly, well, Rolexes are just nice bracelets.
Some of us buy computers as
tools to do practical/useful/fun things, and want a Mac because, all things being equal, we prefer MacOS to the alternatives - not to show the world that we can afford a Mac. Many of us have spent years justifying the extra cost of a Mac in terms of better design and the advantages of MacOS. Apple, however, have taken advantage of that, and pushed the cost up to the point where all things are
not equal and the cost/hardware compromises of getting a Mac are outweighing the advantages of MacOS. They're on a course of extracting more and more money from a non-replenishing pool of users who are either hopelessly committed to Mac-only packages or haven't re-evaluated Windows since WinME or Vista.
The new 16" is one step forward taken after 3 steps back. Golf clap.