Lets see, collaboration with Apple and ONLY sold by Apple. It's an Apple product in every way except name.Nice try. It’s not an Apple product.
Lets see, collaboration with Apple and ONLY sold by Apple. It's an Apple product in every way except name.Nice try. It’s not an Apple product.
Thunderbolt is full-duplex. Not an issue.There are more data passing through thunderbolt when you trying to put the signal back to internal display.
This isn't just only eGPU data stream anymore.
If Apple had wanted to make an eGPU, they would have.Lets see, collaboration with Apple and ONLY sold by Apple. It's an Apple product in every way except name.
It does to me.If Apple had wanted to make an eGPU, they would have.
And there are other products available exclusively at the Apple store. That’s a sales and marketing strategy, and doesn’t make any of them Apple products.
You’re entitled to your own (wrong) opinion, but not your own facts.It does to me.
Do you really think Apple wants all the negative publicity generated by thermal throttling to keep people from buying $3,000 machines, just so they can sell more of a $700 eGPU made by another company?Apple probably designed the new MBP to have thermal throttling issues on purpose, just so they could sell you one of these too.
If I were in the market for an eGPU, I would definitely get a PCIe enclosure with a standard PCIe slot for swapping out cards. $700 for a year-old mobile graphics card seems a bit much to me.I feel like this isn't the best purchase considering you can't replace the card
Its something like 6 Tflops. There are faster cards, and slower ones too.I thought this was something cool and then remembered its the same card thats in my iMac... and I haven't been overly impressed by the speed increase from my 2013 imac to the 2017, even with 40gigs of ram....
Lets see, another non upgradeable over priced, out dated piece of gear from . I think I'll pass, again.
Its something like 6.2 Tflops.
It's already kinda obsolete; it's a Radeon 580. A Vega 56 would be more understandable for the price, but would still have the same problem, i.e. non-replaceable.I wish they could have at least allowed an upgrade with their own proprietary GPU in the future. Even if at a premium $$$$$. It's a neat looking unit that seems to be yet another piece of waste to toss out after a few years when it becomes obsolete.
Not sure you understand what a GPU is or what it's used for; your RAM has no relevance here. A Radeon Pro 580 significantly outperforms a GT 775M, which it ought to since it's years newer. (This benchmark says ~10X faster for bitcoin mining, which is the most extreme difference, but it's still quite a bit faster in general.) It would be cool if a) it was priced a lot less and b) the card was replaceable.I thought this was something cool and then remembered its the same card thats in my iMac... and I haven't been overly impressed by the speed increase from my 2013 imac to the 2017, even with 40gigs of ram....
What were they thinking?! The card is already a year old and the markup is insane, this is a very bad purchase.
By the way, https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...6&cm_re=radeon_580-_-9SIA73M78V9256-_-Product
Markup is insane? $70 over that?
How stupid... what's the point if you can't replace / change the external video card!!
A thermal grille allows for efficient heat dissipation, letting the included fan run lower, so it's as quiet as 18db.
...
What do you think of the Blackmagic eGPU? Do you plan on buying one? Let us know in the comments.
Problem is when you compare it to an nVidia card it's overpriced. A 1070ti is 500 dollars and destroys that card in almost all aspects.
Apple doesn’t understand or doesn’t care about the pro market. It’s about being able to upgrade. This is just another part of their closed system. It’s a $250-300 video card that came out in 2017.