You are completely missing the point!
This Apple product was designed in 2009. In fact, if you want to get down to it, it was designed originally in 2005!
Back then these batteries were common, yes!
Don't try and justify your continued neglect of the real issue here!
The point is that Shamsung have designed a BRAND NEW product in 2021 (not 2009) using this dangerous and disposable primitive battery technology.
POOR DESIGN FORM in 2021!
This is what I was referring to in my original post before you started digging out the archives and clutching at straws.
No, you said I was making things up, that Apple had shelved an item, you said the item wasn't wasn't available.
You said there was no discussion about Apple using button batteries in their tag, but there was a discussion right here on macrumours and if you can be bothered looking, many outside of macrumours.
You know you were wrong on both counts and claim I missed the point.
I'd say the goalposts are being moved here.
Yes, button batteries are dangerous but "Shamsung" is your target, not safety, or you would acknowledge Apple are dangerous too for selling a product that uses a button battery, legacy or not.
These batteries are ubiquitous, you'll find them ii nearly every car remote, heck, they're even in kids toys.
Ssmsung have been in the tracking tag category for a decade, you can't accuse them of copying so now it's "Shamesung" are dangerous.
Is that point I'm missing?
