I am sure the trillion dollar company has been researching foldable phones for some time now. possibly even a space program.![]()
$2.43 Trillion as of today.
I am sure the trillion dollar company has been researching foldable phones for some time now. possibly even a space program.![]()
It's probably ok to report it without posting that you've reported it...post reported.
Honestly I don't notice it. It's comfortable and fits into my pocket without issues. It's definitely not something that I think is a deal breaker. It feels nice and sturdy.Are you both happy with the thickness when folded? The thickness is why I can't imagine myself adopting a foldable device anytime in the near future. I wouldn't mind a mm or two thicker for extra battery, so I am not a worshiper of all things thin. But as an honest question, is it just a compromise you are willing to deal with?
Samsung should do more testing before rushing out products. Apple is never trying to be first, but to have a good product for the consumer. I am so surprised why people don't understand this. It's not the timing, but the product that matters!Foldable phones are the future. Glad Samsung is doing this so apple can order the foldable OLED modules in 2025![]()
I was thinking the exact same thing watching the review. No guts to bring it up.That crease!
Elephant in the room that never gets mentioned even though it is it's fatal flaw
$1,800 for a phone is way too much for me.
I wouldn't 'dismiss' Samsung. They make great washers, and TV's and rolling pins and refrigerators, and they and the Korean Govt. have created a very powerful and corrupt uni-government-coporation. What they make best are commodity items certainly. And they are good at it. I don't wish them harm, I just wish they'd make one thing that's actually revolutionary or truly intriguing. Aside from that, and the fact they are stuck with Google as a partner, I have no trouble rccmdn Samsung items.You won’t appreciate the foldable tech until you actually have used it. Samsung has done a remarkable job with foldables. Sure, it is not perfect by any means yet, but they are getting there.
before dismissing this and Samsung, give it a try. I can’t stand some Apple fanboys who always worship what Ale does and doesn’t do and dismiss everyone else’s effort to innovate.
I wouldn't 'dismiss' Samsung. They make great washers, and TV's and rolling pins and refrigerators, and they and the Korean Govt. have created a very powerful and corrupt uni-government-coporation. What they make best are commodity items certainly. And they are good at it. I don't wish them harm, I just wish they'd make one thing that's actually revolutionary or truly intriguing. Aside from that, and the fact they are stuck with Google as a partner, I have no trouble rccmdn Samsung items.
it really depends on what you’re watching and your surroundings. If you’re watching something dark in a bright room you’ll see it more than if you’re in a dark room. Bright content helps it disappear as well. You will always feel it when your finger runs over it. It honestly doesn’t impact anything at all. Like the notch your brain learns to tune it out.Is the crease the new notch? It seems so obvious in pictures, but I imagine once you use it and get used to it, it "disappears." I'm far to embedded in the Apple ecosystem to even consider one of these, but it's definitely an intriguing piece of tech.
Without a case, its roughly the same thickness as my 12PM in my wallet case. it’s also only roughly 75% as wide as the 12PM when it’s closed.Are you both happy with the thickness when folded? The thickness is why I can't imagine myself adopting a foldable device anytime in the near future. I wouldn't mind a mm or two thicker for extra battery, so I am not a worshiper of all things thin. But as an honest question, is it just a compromise you are willing to deal with?
I think you literally just described the Huawei MateX.I don't care one way or the other about foldables (other than the extra cost). But Samsung is really not thinking in a very innovative way here. They are doing the selfie camera with a barely functional compromise of the under display solution that originally was designed for a standard candybar phone. Standard phones all designed with the aesthetic that there can be no bezels even if the top bezel is made completely functional with cameras and lidar and other sensors. But on a foldable, with all of its other glaring compromises, it is silly to not rethink the aesthetic. The minuses of a foldable design can be utilized to overcome some of the minuses of the standard candybar design.
One of the biggest minuses is the thickness of the folded phone. Now what is one of the minuses of the thin candybar phones? The thinness makes it impossible to put in longer focal length cameras with larger lenses and sensors and a camera bump is the norm. So why are they copying the thin way of making cameras? Instead, make the back half of the phone have an extended camera box that is as deep as the folded phone and only holds front and back cameras and other sensors. The screen would only extend up to the bottom of the camera box. The front half, which also holds the outer screen on its back, would be shorter than the back half and fold into the gap left by the camera box, so that everything is flush when closed. No more camera bump, but larger lenses for both back cameras and the selfie camera. The selfie camera faces the user when both open and closed, and the other cameras face away. Done right, there should be room for lidar depth finders and anything else that is needed. And the larger lenses and sensors without other encumbrances will make better images even before applying computational imaging. That extra quality in the camera would probably be more desirable at that price point than even having a mini-tablet folded into the phone. I would think many more people would find the weight and bulk and cost bearable if the camera was leaps beyond anything else on standard smartphones.
Apple doesn't have such a crappy product and if they ever made such a product it won't be the crap $ammy made. Your argument is invalid. 😂But you'll be in line for a overhyped (by apple) non-innovative gimmick.
Here is a list of phone gimmicks innovated by Samsung and then adopted (or soon to be adopted) by Apple:Apple doesn't have such a crappy product and if they ever made such a product it won't be the crap $ammy made. Your argument is invalid. 😂
I like it it’s different.
MacRumors: Can we please do a giveaway for this phone. Make us happy 😍😍
My phone is essentially my computing device. I’ve been using my iPad a bit more recently so I’m hoping that this will be able to cover both use cases.I'm not buying this for the same reason I don't buy an iPhone Pro Max.. sure the screen is bigger and it has more features, but if it's less portable and slower to handle, it'll just annoy me for 99% of use cases. When I need a big screen, my 16" laptop isn't too far.