It reminds me of the launch of the iPad. People didn’t understand the product, called it a “Big iPhone.”
There is not killer app, there is no must have feature. I will say, playing with the demo at Best Buy, swaping between the front screen and the main screen is a magical. I reminds me of the first time playing with the iPhone (thought the iPhone was another level of magic).
Samsung hasn’t done a great job of explaining why this is a better product than the S21 Ultra.
The S21 has better cameras, better battery life, and a clear message for why you should by that phone.
Though I will admit that the S21 has 12 iterations, so of course it will seem well created. This is only the 3rd version of the fold, 2nd version of the flip, so Samsung has plenty of time ahead to fine tune.
I don’t much like complaints about expensive technology (not saying that this comment applies to you, but I’ve seen people argue that all new tech should be priced for the masses). There is always going to be bleeding edge tech that not everyone can afford, but even if they can’t afford it, they benefit from it.
It brings the new tech to the people that can afford it, but in the coming years, that tech trickles down to the mid range and budget phones. True tone, laminated screens, touch/face id, promotion, Apple Pencil, etc. All those features started on the high end, end up on the entry level. That is because the people who can’t afford them, benefit from better yield rates as the technology matures. I’m not opposed to a company saying “look, this is the best version of a phon we can make, but it’s priced 2.5x more than our normal flaghsip price. We know we’ll sell fewer units than we’d like, but here it is for those who want and can afford it.”
Anyone remember the $100k flat screens that only basketball players owned?