Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I still have my 17" MacBook Pro and a 17" PowerBook G4. Both still bootup and work just fine. I miss those huge screens, but not the weight. The superdrive was pretty nice but I don't see the use of it now as I can't imagine burning a DVD since everything is in the cloud.
 
I owned 2 or 3 different versions of the 17" MacBook Pro and with each one I was bitterly disappointed Apple never included a numeric pad (it used the same keyboard as their 13" model and it just looked comical on the 17" version). I'd definitely buy a bigger screen MacBook Pro if it came out - but not if it has that disgusting butterfly keyboard...

It's a full size keyboard with number pad on the right. This offsets the remainder of the keyboard to the left inside the case. Meaning the typewriter keys are no longer centered in relation to the trackpad. Makes me wonder how awkward that would be in usage.

Nice to have both sides of that story right here; I was working up a reply to the first several hours ago. I am always totally put off by laptops with keypads on the side, for that lack of centring. It just seems odd to have your hands way over to the left of the device most of the time in typing, and to have the trackpad not centred! Of course Apple's trackpads these days occupy almost the entire space, so it might not be so bad, but in general, it is weird.

As for the size thing in general, I don't think it is worth upping the size without upping the resolution, but I have very much been enjoying my Surface Book at 15" and 3240x2160. In some apps the DPI can become an issue, but having both the size and resolution really does make a difference for multitasking. One reason I was so surprised when Apple started pushing full-screen mode, now quite a long time ago!

It would also only be worth it if they do NOT try to get it as thin and light as possible. The point of the larger device should be a desktop replacement, focusing on more port options, a decent graphics card, and great battery life, not squeezing all that out and just taking a rolling pin to a 12" MacBook. Compare -that- to the wonders of the 12" PowerBook from the same vintage as the original 17"s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jchap
You can definitely choose not to buy but why deny more choices? It is not big. I'd take advantage of that real estate to have multiple windows open for work. I hope that they could cram 19 inch in a 17inch body and it'll be good!
 
I would love to have a 17 inch MBP for around the house. I do feel a bit constrained working on my 13, and honestly I never take it with me on trips anymore. My ipad pro is much better for portability, and battery life. This means I don't really need to consider how my laptop fits in a bag, besides the rare occasion I will take it with me.

I'm sure the pricing will be the issue for me. If the 15 starts at $2,000 this will probably be $2,500. That is just out of my range.

My ideal macbook is probably something akin to the 13 inch escape specs, and a bezelless 16-17 inch screen that sells for a reasonable price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanBig
Sorry but after driving a few Hyundais and playing around with a few Samsungs I realized that there is not a damn thing from South Korea that I would want to pay for. No matter what features they have they always feel and look like cheap ugly trash for some reason. I doubt this LG is much different.
 
I would be ok with reduce bezels to achieve a larger viewable area of the screen, but where does the iSight camera go? I guess could can fit it in still
 
Sorry but after driving a few Hyundais and playing around with a few Samsungs I realized that there is not a damn thing from South Korea that I would want to pay for. No matter what features they have they always feel and look like cheap ugly trash for some reason. I doubt this LG is much different.

Funny since a lot of Mac displays are sourced from LG. Like the panels for the 5K iMacs
 
  • Like
Reactions: haydn!
If Apple will re-introduce matte screen for this rumored model then that means it could be their return to segment of professional machines.
And, yes, NO touch bar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanBig
Would never happen but Apple should bring the 17” back with all major ports plus the 4 USB-C ports on the 15”. Would be a great machine for a lot of users.

With Apple's focus on thinness at all costs, there would be little frame left after all the ports are accommodated to have any semblance of structural integrity. We've seen enough Apple laptops in the past where all the ports were crammed on one side right next to each other and the aluminium housing buckled under the slightest pressure.
 
The 17-inch LG Gram weighs just under three pounds, making it a pound lighter than the 15-inch MacBook Pro.
That's exactly the the point at which Apple completely failed: By considering the MBA as a "cheap low end" instead of keeping its crucial importance which was obvious when Jobs introduced it, they have kept the MBA unchanged for more than a decade. When I got my MBA in 2011, I felt "this is the future". But Apple missed the point. Instead of improving the MBA, making it lighter, and increasing the display size (like LG and others have been doing), they made the smaller rMB, and they crippled the MBP, while leaving the MBA untouched, as a low end. The result of this error: MacBooks are heavier than the competitors at the same display size. Not even Microsoft could trash things more.

We would have today a 16inch MBA weighting less than this LG if Apple didn't miss the point. Yes, a expensive MBA, but MBA was not meant to be cheap: That's the point for the MB, not the MBA.
[doublepost=1552554066][/doublepost]
I like the form factor of my 15"MBP. It's perfect for desktop and not too large to travel with. More screen in the same real-estate would be fine but not a larger device to carry around.
The point for travel is not size, but weight. And the current 15'' MBP is too heavy to be comfortable at travel, while too light to be powerful as a Pro laptop. So, the point is that there should be a bigger display MB (not MBP), suitable for travel, but with a proper display size (15'' at the very least, but 16'' would be preferred). Instead they are crippling the MBP, pushing the iPad as your computer, and missing the point with the MBA.

LG is understanding this. Apple is too busy with iPads and iThings.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: entropys
Screen real estate rules if your laptop is your main working machine. That is, if you do more than writing love letters and surfing the net. A 16" MBP in a 15" case is a dream and a true advantage for work-flow and productivity. Count me in on the first buyers list.
 
If Apple released a 16-17” MaBook, I could be tempted to finally upgrade my current system (old 17”). And I would be hyped if it allowed for more RAM (64 GB), even if it translated to a larger enclosure. All that for a price in line with the current generation. If that were to happen ... wow ... but until then ... I’d rather go with a PC.
 
There is simply no replacement for screen estate period. You could live with 13" screen until your workflow requires you to do something more all day every day. Then suddenly you have a desire to have a bigger screen. That's something FB, Word, Email & Browser people have really hard time to comprehend. 17" laptops are very portable as well, if you can live with pocket not so friendly iPhone XS Max you can easily live with not so handbag friendly 17"
 
The LG Gram offers three USB-A ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack, a micro SD card slot, an HDMI port, and a USB-C port, which is a better variety of ports than we're likely to get in a future MacBook Pro, even if it is larger. Apple has transitioned to all USB-C ports on its notebooks, which we don't expect will change.

If I had to choose between the LG and MBP, I would choose the LG because it has all the ports I want and not needing a buy various dongles to connect. In addition, I like the separate numeric keypad which I find it convenient for me to use and after all it does have the real estate space to include one. I wish Apple did bring back those ports but I know why they did away with it.
 
Apple needs to make large screen laptops again. The 11" and 12" models are absolutely useless. Zero screen real estate. My 13" MacBook Air is too small but it's at least somewhat usable.
 
Would never happen but Apple should bring the 17” back with all major ports plus the 4 USB-C ports on the 15”. Would be a great machine for a lot of users.

That would be great and yeah, I know we are not we are not going to see that happen.
 
"The LG Gram offers three USB-A ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack, a micro SD card slot, an HDMI port, and a USB-C port"
All I want for my MacBook Pro... actually instead of 3 x USB-A, 1 + Magsafe would be amazing. So frustrated they killed all the ports.
 
I still have the original 2015 13.3" LG Gram and I absolutely love it for travel. Use it in my living room and tying on it now and still going strong.

It weighs under 1000 grams....all 3 original models 13.3, 14 and 15 ALL weighed under 1,000 grams....a hair over 2 lbs. It was incredible that they pulled off the on the 15" at that weight a few years ago. I chose the smallest form factor because priority was travel as light and small as possible, and at 13.3" screen it was a nice size not too small. If there was a problem it was that the battery sucked but that didnt bother me. The microSD slot came in handy and it had 2 USB3 ports. The screen is high quality IPS display.

LG now goes over 1,000 grams which is a shame because its original name LG Gram was based off the fact that it weighed under 1KG.
 
Imagine a new 17in MBP with 6-8 TB3/USB4 ports!

The problem is that you're unlikely to see that because USB-C/TB3/USB 4 ports are more expensive (both in terms of cost and their requirement for CPU resources like PCIe and internal DisplayPort lanes) to implement. A mixture of port types (as per the LG and the 2012-2015 MBP) is more effective because you don't "block" valuable TB3-capable ports by using them for chargers, displays or USB 2/3.0 devices like mice and memory sticks.

Why would you want 6-8 TB3 ports in a lap top?

...to plug more than 4 things in without needing to carry a hub/dock - especially when just the charger counts as one of those things and you've got a laptop with limited, non-expandable internal storage that may need an external drive (c.f. the old MBP which had an easily upgradeable HD and space for a second one in the optical bay).

Docks are great on a desk where they can be left in place and semi-permanently wired in, but they make no sense whatsoever for mobile use where they just add an extra wire to be connected - and proper Thunderbolt hubs are still quite expensive, while cheaper USB-C hubs force everything through the bottleneck of a single USB3.1g1 lane and can't handle 4k and USB3 at the same time... and if you 'commute' between desks you need a hub on every desk.

If you never need that many ports then good for you - that doesn't mean that nobody else does (and lots of people don't need to connect 80Gbps worth of dual 5k displays, eGPUs and ultra-fast SSD arrays). Plenty of people here appreciated the third USB on the old 17" MBP (not to mention the ExpressCard slot) and you didn't have to use any of those to connect your charger, external display or (necessarily) storage (with an upgradeable internal HD and space for a second HD in place of the optical drive - plus any modern equivalent would probably have a second TB port instead of FireWire & Ethernet)

Meanwhile nobody is suggesting zero TB3/USB-C ports on a 2019 machine (and I think the LG could do with a second one) - so the option of single-port docking isn't going away.

In fact, there's no need for the existing MBP to go away* if people like that - the real problem with the current line-up is the lack of diversity and total obsession with size and weight. Essentially, Apple today only makes "ultrabooks". Last time I looked Apple were #4 in laptop sales, hardly some tiny boutique concern, so they ought to be able to sustain one or two more product lines without turning into Dell.

(* except the keyboard which needs to be staked through the heart, beheaded, soaked in holy water, sprinkled with poppy seeds and buried at a crossroads with one of its socks missing...)
 
For anyone whining about weight I’ve recently (unfortunately) been stuck with an obsolete 13” MacBook Pro from 2009 (the one with the CD drive) that probably weighs more than a modern Apple 17” MacBook Pro with USB-C would.

I also owned a 17” MacBook Pro which I lugged to work every day, and though i thought that was a bit much, a modern 17” MacBook Pro would weigh so much less, and be so worth it for that luxurious screen!
 
Last edited:
i think it says a lot that, at least locally, i have never seen a used 17” macbook for sale. and i browse daily
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.