Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Given that the CPU update is often the main update with new Mac laptops (next in line are SSD updates), updates that don't update the CPU would be rather minor. Look at what updates the retina MBP has received so far in three years beyond CPU updates:
  • Two SSD updates: (1) moving to PCIe and (2) moving to faster PCIe
  • Move from TB 1 to TB 2
  • Faster discrete GPU in 15" MBP
  • Haptic trackpad
  • Slight increases in battery capacity
What would be gained if Apple released those updates separately from CPU updates? I can tell you what would be gained: a more splintered line-up of MBPs that people have to keep track of, including Apple with software and firmware updates.

Silent updates. That's it. No big fuss, no big reveal. If the hardware's there, do it. If it's not, then don't. There have been a plethora of new mobile graphics cards recently.

I do agree that it would be a bad idea to do updates for updates' sake. However there has been a lot of recent tech out that Apple really could have taken advantage of.

And let's look at the Mac Pro. Documented issues with the Radeons failing, and yet they keep selling them. They're going to fail; basically ticking time bombs in a trash can. Change the graphics cards, or change the thermal compound.
 
I only need to upgrade for a better graphics chipset. Can't drive 4K with my 2012 rMBP, even though it's mid-range-at-the-time processor is only about 20% slower than the current high-end i7. I've been holding out hope that Intel will get their crap together and make some serious advances, but it doesn't seem likely. If I want decent speed increases I'll have to move to the iMac, which I'm mostly fine with, as long as I can get an SSD for non-astronomical prices. I mean really, $1/GB for SSDs in 2016? You can get a decent Samsung EVO 850 for around $0.30/GB on Amazon. I'm not saying it should be that cheap, but dang, at most $0.50/GB! And $600 for 32GB RAM? You can get that for less than $200 on Amazon. At least you can easily upgrade it yourself on the 27" model. It's also pretty hilarious that you can go from a 3.3GHz i5 to 4GHz i7 for only $250.

I'll probably get whatever 5k iMac comes out next year, 1TB SSD (hopefully for $500 or less), base RAM upgraded myself to 32GB, high-end graphics and CPU and that will be my machine for the next five years.

I mean, that touch bar sounds cool, but hopefully since it's OLED and Apple is putting rechargeable batteries into their keyboards, we'll get a keyboard with that feature at some point.
 
We run on Macs at the office (well, about 80% of the office), we're over 100 people here; we currently have a ban on Mac purchases, they're deemed too pricy for the hardware level. It sucks because I need a new rMBP, and many others here do too, but I understand why we chose not to buy Macs right now - no idea why Apple can't update the MBP line already, the hardware exists and is available.
 
Buy a Dell XPS 13. Seriously. That machine is a killer notebook and it eats my Retina MacBook Pro for lunch. It is as light as a MacBook Air but provides awesome compute power and long battery life.

But I give you this point: ALL touchpads suck when you use them with any other operating system than OS X. Even Apple's touchpads royally suck when you use Windows or Linux in "Boot Camp". So it's the software that is the problem, not the hardware. And Kudos to Apple: Their touchpad drivers for OS X are the gold standard that has not been matched by anybody else -- not even by Apple's own drivers for Windows. But that is about the last remaining thing where a Mac running OS X is clearly better than every other hard- and software combo out there.

yeah I have been looking at the XPS but I have a hard time justifying the cost. Although if I really needed a new computer the XPS is actually cheaper than the new macbook. I just happened to buy my air when the Canadian dollar was really strong and I got it on a price error at best buy for $899 canadian brand new. The macbook air now costs $1199 canadian regular price and the macbook is $1549!!! Plus 13% tax I can't even imagine spending $1750 after tax on the new macbook and to be honest anyone who would I think is a fool
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tikatika
Or they are working on it and don't want to rush out a product line before it's finished. Patience is going to be a virtue here as frustrating as it is, id rather have a new Macbook Pro announced when ready than have one rushed out.
Or it just doesn't exist this year.
[doublepost=1466089466][/doublepost]
We are in the same position as many here. Money sitting in the bank waiting to be spent on new laptops to replace our 2011 MBAs. Plus more money waiting to be spent on a quad core Mini to support video editing.
What if they release MacBook Pro with potatoe cam?
 
Or it just doesn't exist this year.
[doublepost=1466089466][/doublepost]
What if they release MacBook Pro with potatoe cam?

There is still September and beyond you know, they will probably announce in October.
 
Silent updates. That's it. No big fuss, no big reveal. If the hardware's there, do it. If it's not, then don't. There have been a plethora of new mobile graphics cards recently.
I have to differ here. I prefer annual updates. Makes it much easier to keep track of what features a given model has. I also prefer 13" & 15" MBPs to be updated together with the same features. Again, makes it easier to keep track of things. I even prefer to have all, eg, 2015 models to have the same CPU generation (for all laptops).

Taken together, that means that Apple has to wait for until everything is ready for all models. And given that Intel is staggering their CPU releases over a 9-month period per generation, that means that other manufacturers that don't wait until they can update all their laptops can be easily six months ahead on some models.
 
Wow, that company used to care about computers, now it seems like Mac is an absolute afterthought...
A "hobby" to put it in Cook terms.

Glassed Silver:mac

I wouldn't be too worried about that. The people who run the company use those computers. Well, maybe I would worry a little since Tim is the one who said you can do 80% of your normal work on an iPad and, um, less than 80% of the Keynote was dedicated to the Mac. Hmmm. You might have something there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanJBS
Silent updates. That's it. No big fuss, no big reveal. If the hardware's there, do it. If it's not, then don't. There have been a plethora of new mobile graphics cards recently.

I do agree that it would be a bad idea to do updates for updates' sake. However there has been a lot of recent tech out that Apple really could have taken advantage of.

And let's look at the Mac Pro. Documented issues with the Radeons failing, and yet they keep selling them. They're going to fail; basically ticking time bombs in a trash can. Change the graphics cards, or change the thermal compound.
I just tweeted this guy Tim with updates. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn and G4DPII
I only need to upgrade for a better graphics chipset. Can't drive 4K with my 2012 rMBP, even though it's mid-range-at-the-time processor is only about 20% slower than the current high-end i7.
However the integrated GPU on the current i7 has seen a much larger improvement over the 2012 one (compared to the CPU).
 
The entry-level Mac Mini, once a capable and generously-priced machine to introduce people to the Apple ecosystem, is now a painfully sluggish, soldered, non-upgradable doorstop. You buy an iMac with a Retina display, and get a 5400RPM drive. As if to add insult to injury, you can't even use the new ones in Target Display Mode -- god forbid, as some people may buy the entry-level one so they can have a cheap 4K/5K monitor, rather than having to pay extra for something that performs vaguely acceptably for the price.

I would love for Tim Cook to work some poor Apple advisor's job for a week, and has to explain to somebody why their 2K machine from a self-congratulating, commited-to-quality company, is so darn sluggish. "Well, you paid a lot -- but you didn't pay enough."

It just makes me mad. How much money do you need before it's enough, and you start giving people a little value for their purchase?

Totally agree. There's this pretentiousness or arrogance that's becoming more and more visible with Apple. They've always had a little bit of arrogance, they always pretended that everyone has the money to buy only Apple branded stuff. But if you did buy their stuff, at least you were "in the club". You were guaranteed something incredible and worth it in its own right. Even the iPod Shuffle was a great product on its own, and it worked well, it didn't make you wish you got something better.

Nowadays, it's like this: You pay loads for an Apple product, but could only afford the low-end version. Turns out the low-end version is a dud, it looks like an Apple product from far away, but you would have been better off with just some other cheap product from another manufacturer. 16 GB entry iPhone, (arrogantly no intermediate 32 GB version to justify the high price of the 64 GB version), crappy entry Mac Mini, crappy entry level iMac, removal of features like Target Display as you say, etc... Now, to be "in the club" (by that I mean: to feel like you got care and respect in exchange for your money), you need to carefully choose one of the more expensive products. Also the lack of care for anyone with an iPhone that's older than 2 years: oh, you can upgrade to the new iOS, which will slow down your phone and make it unusable, or you can keep your iOS version but features you rely on will just stop working (like syncing with iCloud).

Apple is the rich kid who's never even considered that not everyone is as rich. "Oh, but you're not supposed to buy the entry level device, that's just so we can say "Starting from $99". Oh we didn't know that $200 for an adapter would be a problem for you, how odd! Oh, too bad you can't keep buying a new iPhone every year, maybe if we make it look like it's made of gold you'll buy it? How about bigger emojis? Oh you mean you want it to be cheaper? Nooo you see we can't do that... But look, it's bigger! And the price is also bigger, but I mean so is the phone, it makes sense."
 
Last edited:
Oh, and the Dells are almost half the price!

Which ones are half the price?

They're certainly attractive, and certainly a bit more bang-per-buck, but looking at the XPS 13 (with the QHD+ display) I don't see a "half the price" difference: more "16GB/i7 for the price of 8GB/i5". The cheaper ones turn out to only have "Intel HD" (not Iris) graphics or mere "Full HD" displays.

The XPS 15s are clearer because they all seem to have half-decent discrete graphics and the top-of-the range XPS 15 32GB/1TB does (superficially) shame the top-end 15" rMBP, though.

Don't know what to think on quality: I know the cheap Dell stuff is get-what-you-pay-for but I've never seen many complaints about their high-end stuff - I've got one of their Ultrasharp displays and have no complaints.
 
Apple is probably having a meeting somewhere wondering why their Mac Pros aren't selling. Perhaps the case isn't trash canny enough? Or the anodization doesn't have the right undertone of blue gray? No. It's because you'd have to be an idiot to spend $10K on 3 year old technology.
Technically, everybody buying Xeon processors (and not using multi-processor setups) is an idiot. Xeons are always a processor generation (or two) behind while costing twice as much as an i7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toke lahti
Probably...but it's iPhone season...and iPad....probably.

iPhone and probably Apple Watch 2 in September, and Mac's and possibly iPads in October, that's what Apple use to do before. However I'm not sure they will announce new iPads this year, they announced the iPad Pro 9"7 in March this year so I can't see that ending updated. And the iPad Pro 12.9" was announced in September last year so I'm not sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pulp46
My wallet is also ready to buy a new Skylake MacBook Pro... but nothing. Apple has really put any device that is not iOS based as a secondary thought (hobby!). Shame, Apple has almost forgotten the Mac customers in the rush to make the next iPhone.
So you're saying Apple should delay the release of the next iPhone so they can spend more time on their hobby?
 
iPhone and probably Apple Watch 2 in September, and Mac's and possibly iPads in October, that's what Apple use to do before. However I'm not sure they will announce new iPads this year, they announced the iPad Pro 9"7 in March this year so I can't see that ending updated. And the iPad Pro 12.9" was announced in September last year so I'm not sure.
We'll see how it turn out. This keynotes schedule has been werid this year.
 
Apple... the release everything at once company.

Fall Every Year:
Updated macOS
Updated iOS
Updated tvOS
Updated watchOS
Updated iPhones
Updated AppleWatch
Updated Macbook
Updated Macbook Pro
Updated iMac

And best part, when something goes wrong, you don't know if it's the new hardware or software... heck it could be both.

They use to keep the buzz and excitement going on year round by staggered releases. Now, they only get my attention two times a year with one usually ending up in disappointment (WWDC) and the other in frustration because of buggy software (Fall everything release).
 
iPhone and probably Apple Watch 2 in September, and Mac's and possibly iPads in October, that's what Apple use to do before. However I'm not sure they will announce new iPads this year, they announced the iPad Pro 9"7 in March this year so I can't see that ending updated. And the iPad Pro 12.9" was announced in September last year so I'm not sure.
Remember that under those Steve Jobs days, Apple stopped attending MacWorld, so they weren't forced to announce updated hardware every year on a set schedule. So what Apple "used to do before" was surprise us. The good-old-days when Apple could be predicted like clockwork are just our sepia-tinted memories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankaa and manu chao
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.