I have a 3:20 A.M. time stamp and my MBP is headed for Florida. Had I known that it would take this long to get out of China I would have paid for expidited.
Unfortunately though my boyfriend says I'm worse than a crack head waiting for the dealer!!! How dare he! LOL but seriously I think I might need help.
New Poll....How many times an hour do you hit refresh on tracking info![]()
I didn't pay for expedited, but the Apple service rep upgraded me from Standard to Expedited for free. But maybe this kind of free upgrade doesn't have as much priority as someone who actually pays for it?Question: did anyone with a Apr 20 3:20am 2nd "in transit" scan pay for expedited? Probably answered somewhere back but I can't recall if it was...
If it makes you feel better, mine is expedited (although I didn't pay for it, Apple service rep upgraded it for me), so I'm not sure expedited would have made a difference. Our delay is really odd.
I still haven't cleared customs but it's 1:15AM CDT so I'm going to bed. I'll check in the morning and see if I made it through customs and onto one of two flights headed my way. Have a good night all.
Physchos did you and anyone else on the FDX90 flight pay for expedited? I'm thinking that's the reason why the "320" people have are not in the US yet. We are part of the normal shipment and you guys were express.
What do you think ?
Physchos did you and anyone else on the FDX90 flight pay for expedited? I'm thinking that's the reason why the "320" people have are not in the US yet. We are part of the normal shipment and you guys were express.
Not sure exactly what IP Direct Distribution means, but it seemed to be a 3rd party courier that was not specifically FedEx. If this is the case, 3rd party couriers which are usually faster, may end up being slower if commercial flights are being re-routed, or run on planes of different than usual size, given they may not have their own fleet to use such as FedEx....
I don't believe this to be the case; see my post immediately before yours. Some of that is speculation, but also based on what I've read and shipping info I've seen.
Also see fedex.com on the issue. So, as I understand it, it's just a way to send a bunch of packages to the same country, with the shipper electronically and likely also physically consolidating them into groups that are then treated as large individual pieces until they hit the destination country and clear customs. At that point, they are treated as regular individual FedEx packages.
Any chance we're on the Continental flight that gets in at 7am this morning to Newark... I don't know why they'd send New York packages via Anchorage — its significantly further. Plus a 320am scan doesn't match up with any fedex flights and would give it time to get loaded up full of passengers, and then out of the gate by the 5am actual departure time of the flight.
Otherwise you're really pushing it to get it on a flight to Memphis, through customs, then a flight to New York by 1030am on the 21st if it hasn't even left Shanghai yet...
WordFor people who got it delivered earlier than the expected date through fedex; could you post the transit history?
Almost certainly not. FedEx has its own fleet, and sending freight on passenger aircraft is much more expensive. If they were contracting out to another carrier, it would be one of the many other cargo carriers who flies between China and the US.
It's also absolutely not significantly further; take a look at a globe rather than a 2D Mercator projection or whatever (or see a good 2D projection like the link I have below.) The polar routes to most of the US go right past/through Alaska for most destinations. PVG-ANC-NYC is 4.0% further than PVG-NYC. And I can guarantee you that those 4% are MORE than made up for in fuel savings; you don't have to carry a ton of extra fuel to get you all the way to NYC from China. Instead you can land in Anchorage without all that excess fuel to carry. Cargo normally does not fly such long routes as PVG-NYC; there aren't many freighter planes that can fly that distance efficiently. The reason passenger flights that long exist is since us humans tend to prefer fewer stops; cargo doesn't mind if it takes a couple extra stops to save fuel. And ANC is also extremely convenient since it's right in the way of so many different routes: why send cargo all that way to NYC, from where you'd have to fly it backwards to most of the US, when you can bundle it up with other cargo and split it up in ANC to fly to its final destination... The PVG-MEM flight is unusually long for cargo and I don't fully understand its purpose myself.But it goes into a far larger hub than NYC for FedEx, with much better connections.
Not at all. With a 9PM departure out of Shanghai on FDX28 PVG-ANC, you arrive in ANC around 12PM - 1PM the same day (going back in time thanks to the time difference.) There are a bunch of ANC flights that get to you US hubs in time to make a connection early the next morning to almost anywhere in the US. (See my mini-FAQ in my sig if you're curious about that further.) Even if that flight into ANC was delayed by 2 or 3 hours, you can still easily make it onto most connections. So, due to the time difference, a package shipped from Shanghai can very easily make it to the continental US the next calendar day.
Oops, meant to say Shanghai - Ank - Memphis - NYC or anything involving Memphis, didn't make any sense... and there's got to be enough going from China to NYC to come straight here... I bet you could fill a plane with laptops and iPads and nothing else, park it in Newark and you'd need another in a week. Though you're certainly right, fuel savings are probably greater than 4%... and for that route, I did think it was more like 10-15% further.
Anyway, point of my speculation was just wishful thinking of it getting to me tomorrow if it landed by 7am EST, it could be in Manhattan in time for the trucks... and that I paid for expediting shipping, which to me means they should put that sucker on a non-stop flight to the closest airport. The whole bulk packaging now that I know what it is kind of irritates me. I mean, buy it a ticket if you need to — don't they realize that Apple laptops are like people, and they don't like making stops either.
I was kind of annoyed not to see a different shipping option, like the type of private courier I've mentioned. We send stuff to LA all the time like that, its great. Why can't we have the reverse from China?
Fair Enough
Any chance we're on the Continental flight that gets in at 7am this morning to Newark... I don't know why they'd send New York packages via Anchorage its significantly further. Plus a 320am scan doesn't match up with any fedex flights and would give it time to get loaded up full of passengers, and then out of the gate by the 5am actual departure time of the flight.
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/COA86
Otherwise you're really pushing it to get it on a flight to Memphis, through customs, then a flight to New York by 1030am on the 21st if it hasn't even left Shanghai yet...
Sorry, I did not want to devalue the really good work you've done here. I am myself following closely and trying to figure out which flight my packet might take (I am one of those people with the yet unexplained 3:20am timestamp on theirs). My point was merely that we should not disregard the possibility of the "In Transit" scans being genuine indicators to a flight which we can not see on FlightAware.
If those packets take the ANC-Flight in 10 hours, there would only be 24 hours after the departure for a timely delivery to those people that have a expected delivery on the 21st, which all together seems rather infeasible (for me it might be possible as I live only 10 minutes from MSP).
Usually the internal tracking system's estimates are extremely accurate. Those facts make me believe that the departure scans are genuine and the packets in the air.