If the device doesn't need to be returned and it wasn't fully paid for in the beginning, then that makes sense. If the device needs to be returned or if it was paid for then the trade-in is basically just lost for essentially nothing, which doesn't make much sense (aside from just sense from the carrier getting something for essentially nothing).
[doublepost=1478275635][/doublepost]
Sure, it's business and it's how it is and all that, doesn't mean that something about it doesn't smell right if the carrier gets something for essentially nothing while the customer loses something for essentially nothing.
Yes, but the consumer should also weigh in their options and know the terms they sign and agree to.
Not like the OP's friend oh I didn't know is not much of a defense on his part.
Live and learn I guess