If your app is 100% free, there is no reason to change to the new terms.
There is you want to build an app that Apple wouldn't approve for their App store. For example, I would like to see a Bash terminal app where I can fully utilize Brew.
If your app is 100% free, there is no reason to change to the new terms.
No. If I am reading the terms right, 17% commission applies even if you process transactions outside App Store.Can’t you let your app in the Apple App Store, and just switch to the €0,50 / 17% / 10% model and use your own payment system to avoid paying the commission?
Then you have to pay, if you app goes over 1 million downloads. What app with over 1 millions downloads doesn't make money? There isn't any free lunches.There is you want to build an app that Apple wouldn't approve for their App store.
Then again, you would need to offload the cost of tech fees to users somehow and thus likely there will not be fully free apps outside Apple App Store (in now permitted alternative app stores).There is you want to build an app that Apple wouldn't approve for their App store. For example, I would like to see a Bash terminal app where I can fully utilize Brew.
But then that’s completely defying the point. The dev would still be forced to use the AppStore, which these regs are trying to prevent.If your app is 100% free, there is no reason to change to the new terms.
There’s millions all over the internet. Like at GitHub. For every OS except iOS.Then again, you would need to offload the cost of tech fees to users somehow and thus likely there will not be fully free apps outside Apple App Store.
Then you have to pay, if you app goes over 1 million downloads. What app with over 1 millions downloads doesn't make money? There isn't any free lunches.
Open source. The world is run on open source apps. iOS itself is based off open source OS’.Then you have to pay, if you app goes over 1 million downloads. What app with over 1 millions downloads doesn't make money? There isn't any free lunches.
Point was that few open source devs want to pay tech fees required for distributing their free apps outside Apple App Store.I'd advise that you take a gander into the open-source world.
I get it, it would quite the pain to do soMy iCloud account is also from the US while my AppStore ID is Germany and I am also in Germany. Will be curious how / if it will work. I am not willing to change my iCloud account to Germany after 20 years
My statement meant: Fully free apps distributed for iOS outside of Apple App Store using alternative app stores in EU.There’s millions all over the internet. Like at GitHub. For every OS except iOS.
This has always been a pain. Apple does not offer any way to merge accounts or move apps from store to store.I get it, it would quite the pain to do so
If this is indeed the case, and it’s not possible (which it looks like) then Apple has badly (purposely?) missed the entire point of what people want. Maybe it fits in the the regulations though, I don’t know. Whatever the case is, Apple seem to be (again, purposely?) out of touch with the mood.My statement meant: Fully free apps distributed for iOS outside of Apple App Store using alternative app stores in EU.
Open source companies still need to make money and the successful ones do.Open source. The world is run on open source apps. iOS itself is based off open source OS’.
What percentage of people even know what's going on let alone what more app stores on their phone?If this is indeed the case, and it’s not possible (which it looks like) then Apple has badly (purposely?) missed the entire point of what people want. Maybe it fits in the the regulations though, I don’t know. Whatever the case is, Apple seem to be (again, purposely?) out of touch with the mood.
If the EU says it's fine under the DMA then they have no legal route. The whole thing is market cap based. Over the cap, the DMA applies. So approval under the DMA = no court challenges. That was the point of legislating the DMA. Apple wasn't really violating any laws which is why no one had much success suing in court. I guess you could go to court to try and say the DMA itself is somehow illegal.Brilliant. Let’s see if Apple will win the inevitable court challenges.
Open source companies still need to make money and the successful ones do.
Many do, many don’t. But clearly you don’t understand the open source philosophy, based on this comment.Open source companies still need to make money and the successful ones do.
While working an Apple store was when a parent or grand parent came in and their smart kid or grand kid jail broke their phone and now they were having issues. I’m not saying it the sam Thing is going to happen but there will be a level of complexity for the majority of older folks. I think it will be exciting to watch, in a sinister wayIf you ask most iPhone users they don't care about a 3rd party store. And those who do want this kind of thing, can buy an Android phone. This is an example of over-regulation from the EU.
Being a dev that only works with open source software, I fully understand open source. And open source companies can be nonprofit and if they are they don't have to pay the tech fee.Many do, many don’t. But clearly you don’t understand the open source philosophy, based on this comment.
It's not weird. It's because desktop computing started in the 1970s before digital stores existed. As a result, consumers and businesses have a legacy expectation for how software distribution on that platform works.It is nice for Apple to finally admit that it feels its users outside of the EU cannot decide for themselves whether to take the risk of of downloading third party apps … on iOS. Weird that they allow us to do it on the more expensive Macs though?
These two comments don’t match up then.Then you have to pay, if you app goes over 1 million downloads. What app with over 1 millions downloads doesn't make money? There isn't any free lunches.
Anyone can make free(libre) and open software for every single other mainstream os except iOS.Being a dev that only works with open source software, I fully understand open source. And open source companies can be nonprofit and if they are they don't have to pay the tech fee.