Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Perhaps she should've had better passwords.


what i don't understand is that those photos were taken using iPhones...yet the photos themselves were of appalling quality

the photos i take with the iPhone are stellar...so i wonder what is up with the photos then
 
A diamond for the cover for the display would be ridiculously expensive. It wouldn't be good to use that and expect people to buy it.

What's interesting is that there are ways to strengthen glass with PVD ion process, which is what they are using for the non-Sapphire models on the watches and phones. It's not common knowledge, but it's quite possible that maybe they can strengthen Saphire with this process as well?

I'm sure they will be using the PVD with gold sputtering process since it only uses a very small amount of gold, the thickness is only about 2 microns thick and it's a LOT cheaper than traditional gold plating, and it's a LOT stronger of a bond which makes it more durable. Apple can also do various types of bronze finishes, black chrome, various colors, rainbow coating, etc. with PVD coating technologies.

If Apple uses PVD sputtered gold, the price difference might not be that much, so this $1200 sounds more like speculation rather than reality.

Obviously, stainless steel is more expensive than aluminum and it's more expensive to fabricate, so the material and labor is more expensive. So I don't know how Apple is going to price these watches due to sapphire, stainless steel and gold plating and strap options.
It is physically possible to use PVD ion plating with synthetic sapphire, such as the sapphire used in the non-sport version of the Apple Watch (since the low end Sport edition won't use sapphire).

However, you definitely would not want to. PVD ion plating doesn't make glass/etc. "harder" per se, it simply adds a scratch-resistant coating, which Apple has already been doing for years. The reason that PVD ion plating is used is because it makes it much more scratch-resistant. It appears that the PVD ion plating process used by Apple on the iPhone 6/6+ and the "Sport" version of the Apple Watch is proprietary and the exact compound coating is secret. However, I very highly doubt that it is as hard and scratch-resistant as sapphire.

Keep in mind, PVD ion plating will not help very much with shattering. It adds to the "hardness" of the material, but it doesn't prevent fracturing upon a physical impact.
 
Breaking new..idiots buy Apple logo watch. They should sell a rock with an Apple logo
 
Last edited:
TLDR

But in my humble opinion, between U2 suckness, and the gold watch that's obsolete in 1 year, Apple jumped the shark

I will be wrong I guess cuz apple faniacs will buy this sheeeet up
 
Breaking new..idiots buy Apple logo watch. They should sell a rock with an Apple logo
Now Samsung will be forced to release their sRock this year!

----------

But in my humble opinion, between U2 suckness, and the gold watch that's obsolete in 1 year, Apple jumped the shark

Jumping the shark has jumped the shark. Happy days was a crappy show, please kill all references to it henceforth.
 
You just showed that the Mac Pro is cool, but not a serious workstation.

Man, you dint pay attention to my comment. Am talking about displays. Obviously you don't look on the tower when using it, you look on the rectangle monitor it is connected to.
 
You guys are all completely seeing this wrong. These gold watches aren't aimed at the avg. consumer like you. This is for people who can wear this as jewellery, aka. the people who treat 1k $ like cents.
 
You guys are all completely seeing this wrong. These gold watches aren't aimed at the avg. consumer like you. This is for people who can wear this as jewellery, aka. the people who treat 1k $ like cents.

true.

except there are people who can afford to waste a few thousand on this Edition on this forum too
 
Man, you dint pay attention to my comment. Am talking about displays. Obviously you don't look on the tower when using it, you look on the rectangle monitor it is connected to.

I saw you might be talking only about displays, but the similar form over function nature of the Mac Pro still stands.
 
Personally, I find yellow gold to be quite tacky. I tolerate it on connectors because it's so chemically boring that it doesn't corrode under normal conditions and still conducts very well. Gold bullion bars and coins are nice as well. It does look cool on people with dark hair and/or skin though. Could be a color hue thing... bright pink works well with silver, dark brown well with gold.

I think the "Edition" watches will be bought by the same people who currently have iPhone cases that are covered with actual diamonds. They want the iPhone because it's simple and ubiquitous yet does what a smartphone needs to do. But they also want the bragging rights of having the most expensive/outrageous thing out there. Like owning the latest Lamborghini and never driving it. I remember an iPhone app that just displayed some diamonds and cost a lot of money and people bought it like crazy because of the status symbol value.

I think the more expensive the gold Apple Watch is, the more profit it will make simply based on rich people economics.
 
TLDR

But in my humble opinion, between U2 suckness, and the gold watch that's obsolete in 1 year, Apple jumped the shark

I will be wrong I guess cuz apple faniacs will buy this sheeeet up

Yes. Giving away something free to customers and giving them an option to buy something that provides apple with very high margins, but providing lower priced options for everyone else presages the fall of apple.
 
First, this watch will not be solid 18 k gold. Not at that price point. Guaranteed. Apple already said the metal is mixed with something to make it harder than gold, hence, it is not pure gold.

Second, I am a watch collector. I have more invested in watches than I would care to mention. The watches I collect however are just that, investments. They often hold their value or many gain value over time. A consumer electronic like this will not. It will depreciate just like any consumer electronic will. And it will probably depreciate a lot more than the base watches which will all do the exact same thing as the more expensive version.

Will people still buy it? Yes, because people are foolish with their money.
18k gold is mixed with something other than gold to make it harder. 18k gold is only 75% gold. A watch collector would know that.
 
18k gold is mixed with something other than gold to make it harder. 18k gold is only 75% gold. A watch collector would know that.

He did not say 100% gold, but solid gold, as opposed to gold plated (although later he seems confused about what 18k means).

Solid gold would cost much more than $1200 if it were a real watch, but this is a mass market gadget, so who knows.
 
This would be good for collectors that want this unopened / brand new in the box to resell later.

Look what a 1st generation iPhone is going for (brand new in box).
 
Last edited:
Says the guy who compared Rolex to Bose. You have no room to tell people what they can and can't reference to. ;)


I think all the kids today are using "Nuke the fridge"

Nuking_the_Fridge_by_GreyOfPTA.jpg
 
Well it's supposedly only 12.5mm.
Do you know anything about how thick watches usually are?

That is 1/2" thick. Not exactly svelte. Good luck getting that underneath the cuff on a long sleeve shirt.

The watch I am wearing now is .3" thick. Which is about normal for most watches, although dress watches tend to be thinner than sports watches.

Only when you get to something like a Rolex Explorer, which is an absolute monster of a watch, do you begin to approach this 0.5" thickness... I have never liked watches that large. Possibly most common Rolex (Oyster Pertpeuta) is 10.4mm thick, which makes the Apple watch a monster.
 
Last edited:
This would be good for collectors that want this unopened / brand new in the box to resell later.

Look what a 1st generation iPhone is going for (brand new in box).

All I see is an asking price, what is it really going for?

It is true that I'm thinking about doing this.
 
I saw you might be talking only about displays, but the similar form over function nature of the Mac Pro still stands.

Ah, ok. Well, I have not got enough money to buy something like that without truly needing it but I though the design had few purposes, like better cooling etc! I may be wrong but I though I have read some reasoning somewhere!
 
Ah, ok. Well, I have not got enough money to buy something like that without truly needing it but I though the design had few purposes, like better cooling etc! I may be wrong but I though I have read some reasoning somewhere!

The Cube had similar cooling and its footprint was squarish.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.