They didn't explicitly say it wasn't gold plated did they? That'd substantially reduce the cost.
They advertise the case as 18kt gold, not gold plated.
They didn't explicitly say it wasn't gold plated did they? That'd substantially reduce the cost.
Perhaps she should've had better passwords.
It is physically possible to use PVD ion plating with synthetic sapphire, such as the sapphire used in the non-sport version of the Apple Watch (since the low end Sport edition won't use sapphire).A diamond for the cover for the display would be ridiculously expensive. It wouldn't be good to use that and expect people to buy it.
What's interesting is that there are ways to strengthen glass with PVD ion process, which is what they are using for the non-Sapphire models on the watches and phones. It's not common knowledge, but it's quite possible that maybe they can strengthen Saphire with this process as well?
I'm sure they will be using the PVD with gold sputtering process since it only uses a very small amount of gold, the thickness is only about 2 microns thick and it's a LOT cheaper than traditional gold plating, and it's a LOT stronger of a bond which makes it more durable. Apple can also do various types of bronze finishes, black chrome, various colors, rainbow coating, etc. with PVD coating technologies.
If Apple uses PVD sputtered gold, the price difference might not be that much, so this $1200 sounds more like speculation rather than reality.
Obviously, stainless steel is more expensive than aluminum and it's more expensive to fabricate, so the material and labor is more expensive. So I don't know how Apple is going to price these watches due to sapphire, stainless steel and gold plating and strap options.
Now Samsung will be forced to release their sRock this year!Breaking new..idiots buy Apple logo watch. They should sell a rock with an Apple logo
But in my humble opinion, between U2 suckness, and the gold watch that's obsolete in 1 year, Apple jumped the shark
You just showed that the Mac Pro is cool, but not a serious workstation.
The misogyny is strong in this one.
You guys are all completely seeing this wrong. These gold watches aren't aimed at the avg. consumer like you. This is for people who can wear this as jewellery, aka. the people who treat 1k $ like cents.
Man, you dint pay attention to my comment. Am talking about displays. Obviously you don't look on the tower when using it, you look on the rectangle monitor it is connected to.
TLDR
But in my humble opinion, between U2 suckness, and the gold watch that's obsolete in 1 year, Apple jumped the shark
I will be wrong I guess cuz apple faniacs will buy this sheeeet up
18k gold is mixed with something other than gold to make it harder. 18k gold is only 75% gold. A watch collector would know that.First, this watch will not be solid 18 k gold. Not at that price point. Guaranteed. Apple already said the metal is mixed with something to make it harder than gold, hence, it is not pure gold.
Second, I am a watch collector. I have more invested in watches than I would care to mention. The watches I collect however are just that, investments. They often hold their value or many gain value over time. A consumer electronic like this will not. It will depreciate just like any consumer electronic will. And it will probably depreciate a lot more than the base watches which will all do the exact same thing as the more expensive version.
Will people still buy it? Yes, because people are foolish with their money.
18k gold is mixed with something other than gold to make it harder. 18k gold is only 75% gold. A watch collector would know that.
Jumping the shark has jumped the shark. Happy days was a crappy show, please kill all references to it henceforth.
Says the guy who compared Rolex to Bose. You have no room to tell people what they can and can't reference to.![]()
Well it's supposedly only 12.5mm.
Do you know anything about how thick watches usually are?
This would be good for collectors that want this unopened / brand new in the box to resell later.
Look what a 1st generation iPhone is going for (brand new in box).
I saw you might be talking only about displays, but the similar form over function nature of the Mac Pro still stands.
Ah, ok. Well, I have not got enough money to buy something like that without truly needing it but I though the design had few purposes, like better cooling etc! I may be wrong but I though I have read some reasoning somewhere!