no, the shape is completely different, the mini-hdmi port is very thin while the mistery display port is nearly square.
I just checked and there isn't any, but including the screws the DVI port is more than 3 times as wide as the mini-DVI one.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Higher Quality MacBook Pro Case Photos
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
no, the shape is completely different, the mini-hdmi port is very thin while the mistery display port is nearly square.
I just checked and there isn't any, but including the screws the DVI port is more than 3 times as wide as the mini-DVI one.
Hdmi?
if i am just saying something wrong please correct me but i am wondering if that port covered by tape could be an HDMI out???
thanks
This port is certainly not DVI, Mini DVI, or Micro DVI. It also seems like it is not wide enough to be HDMI and it doesn't look like it fits DisplayPort either! Does anyone know what this port is?
Upon further inspection, it seems like it is Mini DVI. Sorry. However, I hope this picture is (or I am) wrong. People won't be too happy if they cannot power their 30" displays with their MBP.
if i am just saying something wrong please correct me but i am wondering if that port covered by tape could be an HDMI out???
thanks
Erm.. no, you just get it around the back, that's what current macbook users do you know...any chance it is a mini usb?
well well.....i guess with no usb on the right I must have the wire of the mouse all over....excellent!!!!
why?
why glass...doesn't make sense what is the advantage...unless its a screen? i t cant be for the feel...i like the touch's screen more than the iphones glass screen.
why glass...doesn't make sense what is the advantage...unless its a screen? i t cant be for the feel...i like the touch's screen more than the iphones glass screen.
Like hell. The overwhelming majority of films intended for theatrical release are shot in 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 (There are a few others, but those are the main players), which is still letterboxed on a 16:9 display.
Widescreen TV shows and made for TV movies are the obvious exception here.
I think it's getting to that point now. I'll be glad when you order one and get off that damn Dell. Though if your past is anything, this MacBook will be a POS too.
Well, you know umm, I really like to see something new on the MBA.. I do not really care if it will have a glass trackpad or a normal one as long as it will be at least updated....
yeah it would be in an extremely weird place..but i suppose it is possible...glimmer of hope...but doesnt seem to fit
See also: Apple forgetting that most people are right handed, and most people plug crap in more often than they put in a CD/DVD.
Actually, knowing Apple they probably didn't forget, they just don't care.
i havent read through all of the pages, so sorry if it's a repeat...
has anyone seen this picture from that macX.cn site?
has anyone seen this picture from that macX.cn site?
I am sorry my friend, I cannot answer to that...
oh shoot i feel like i missed something...what did i say?
This is nonsense, either the 16/9 is as high as the 16/10 screen and therefore wider, or it is smaller (shorter) and therefore around the same width, but in any case this is unrelated to having a keypad or not.
On what ground exactly?
Wow I'm completely impressed.
Not.
No, 16/9 was already an established format when 16/10 got started on computers, and the computer industry is currently standardized on 16/10 for everything that isn't 4/3, even display ports capacities (such as HDMI or DisplayPort) are expressed in terms of achievable 16/10 resolution. 16/10 is already the post-4/3 standard. Note that 16/10 was chosen to allow the reading of two pages of text side by side.
I haven't the faintest idear.
slowpoe: Nothing is wrong with 1080p...for video resolutions. I'd much rather have a higher-than-1080p resolution in more of the MBP's besides just the 17"
Give me a 15.4" MBP @ 1920x1200 please.
You can get a wireless mouse from Apple.
It's only 69$.
Of course you aren't one of these cheapskates finding a mere 69$ too much, are you?
I know from my girlfriends Macbook....it is true but I think non accectable on e Pro....
well i already have both a wire and wireless mighty mouse but why not having the option to use both on the pro?
do you think the unknown port is a mini-USB?
It's probably glass. Frosted on the back with a silver backing would make it blend with the case quite well, too.
No, no no you said nothing inappropriate. Accept my apologies I didn't state it well. I wanted to say that I do not know. I already changed it. English is not my first language.. Sorry.
I don't know, having all my crap plugged at the right of the computer would mean having a lot of cable-mess there, and since I'm usually mousing right there when I'm on a desk with my 'book I'd be mousing in the cables, making things... painful.
what are you talking about? If you are a creative artist just get a machine with enough horse power (read mbp). You are not the target market of the macbook. Apple's vision of the macbook is a cheap mac that runs os x decently. It was never geared towards "creative artists".