I only addressed macs. Go take up your straw man argument with someone else.
I don't think you understand what a "straw man argument" is, but ok.
I only addressed macs. Go take up your straw man argument with someone else.
Hard to tell anything yet, isn’t it?Prime video is a lot better than whatever this is gonna be, I can tell you that. It’s not necessarily the benchmark, that’s probably Netflix, but it’s a big pressure on Apple to enter this space.
“Do you mean...” (proceed to argue against a position I never took)I don't think you understand what a "straw man argument" is, but ok.
More power to Apple. If they actually get us another "Breaking Bad", then do whatever it takes. If, on the other hand, they deliver us some whitewashed edgeless ********, i will do a 180 on this one.
Bottom line: Let's wait and see.
AKA confirmation bias. Seems like it would be hard to know if the content is any good before you see it, but I guess you’ve got that worked out.I’ve had zero interest in this project since the get-go, so none of this is changing my mind on it. In fact, all it did was reinforce my original decision.
More power to Apple. If they actually get us another "Breaking Bad", then do whatever it takes. If, on the other hand, they deliver us some whitewashed edgeless ********, i will do a 180 on this one.
Bottom line: Let's wait and see.
AKA confirmation bias. Seems like it would be hard to know if the content is any good before you see it, but I guess you’ve got that worked out.
I don't think we would have ended up with Breaking Bad if execs had sent Vince Gilligan notes that said: "Don't be so mean!!!"
The branding message since 2012 is overpriced and yesterday’s news. Timmy better could paying attention to this than watching and commenting shows. My guess he’s clueless on both.If they buy Netflix, they will still go thru this process to filter content, so it doesn’t solve anything.
The bottom line is the content does not match Apple’s branding message.
Who is they? Tim Cook and Eddy Cue? The only argument someone can make for Apple being in the original content business is they have more cash than they know what to do with and can fund projects. But I’m sure we could all come up with lots of other things they could spend their cash on. Is it something they could charge people $15/mo for (which is what Wall Street wants)? Who knows. But it probably would be more compelling than this.
No, but I’m sure your crystal ball helps immeasurably. PM me lotto numbers when you get a chanceWell, it really doesn’t take a genius.
Sounds to me Cook is aiming for a remake of Bambi![]()
Don’t be so mean, lolBambi has deaths and fires and violence. No way he would go that far.
It's the difference between "Philadelphia", a gay man's struggle with aids (it's has a purpose) and hey, we need someone to be gay, you're now gay, please add some pointless side story to show it.
Wish ‘they’ used a fraction of that cash for their Mac business. It wouldn’t cost a billion for all those years for getting the Mac and their software state of the art again.Who is they? Tim Cook and Eddy Cue? The only argument someone can make for Apple being in the original content business is they have more cash than they know what to do with and can fund projects. But I’m sure we could all come up with lots of other things they could spend their cash on. Is it something they could charge people $15/mo for (which is what Wall Street wants)? Who knows. But it probably would be more compelling than this.