Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My wife and I have been wanting to buy a quality portable Bluetooth speaker for a while. The only reason I would consider this would be for the sound quality. I have these questions about it.
1) Does the speaker have to be plugged into the wall or can it charge and/or accept batteries?
2) Does the paired phone have to be on the same network (WiFi) as it or can it actually connect via Bluetooth?
1- AC outlet only
2- Wifi (but it can play music from Apple Music directly without a paired device)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spizike9
When the price falls below $100 for the HomePod, I will more than happy to get several.
It won’t cost less than $100 in its current form. It would have to be a smaller, less powerful version.
[doublepost=1540231067][/doublepost]
With an infamous assistant and the high price, that's what happens. I know people say it's an amazing speaker (and it probably is), but clearly the market doesn't necessarily want that.

If I could hook it it up to me TV (in lieu of a soundbar), I'd buy one.
I’ve got mine hooked up to my Apple TV which I do 99% of my viewing through.
 
Amazon has the same strategy as google. They'll give services away free or cheap because that's a gateway to their revenue. Alexa is just that, it helps Amazon sign people up to the ever price increasing Prime Membership and sell stuff from their website. Google uses its services to sell to adverts. But Apple only sells hardware, there is no back end profit for them. That's why their stuff costs more.

Agreed.

Apple simply doesn't value their users as much as Amazon/Google does. I would not expect the HomePod to drop down in price significantly any time soon. Their business is centered around hardware profits more so than users because they don't really have the breadth of the ecosystem that Amazon/Google has.
 
I love HomePod but it should be offered in a stereo configuration at a discount ($599) and a cheaper smaller version at $149.

I would also love Dolby Atmos support. I would get several more.

Yeah, great sound is certainly a niche market.

I love HomePod and I don't even mind $350 price tag. I think $350 is actually a good price given the audio quality. But it's not particularly flexible due to lack of audio inputs and surround configuration.

If Apple adds Dolby Atmos to HomePod via software update and enable Apple TV to act as a home theater hub (HDMI eARC input), I bet a ton of home theater aficionados would snatch these things up.

How on earth do you expect a single mono speaker to support Atmos?

Start with mono, and if you add a second speaker you can do stereo, if you add a center speaker, two surround speakers and a sub you can have 5.1, If you add ceiling speakers or special left and right speakers that have an additional angled speaker speaker that bounces sound you have Atmos.

How do you envision a HomePod or even a pair to offer three-dimensional sound? Are you going to put five home pods around your room and hang one from the ceiling?
 
Looks worse if you combine products by company...

Amazon 61%
Google 17%
Apple 4%

Amazon is killing it on the hardware front but Google is still king in AI, software and services. I've found myself drifting away from Apple to Google and now to Amazon devices (Fire HD 10 2017 tablet and Fire TV Stick 2nd gen and soon to be Fire TV Stick 4K).
Homepod is $350,you can get a dot for a couple of bucks. Yeah amazon is killing it via market share. And we know how market share is king for android.
 
Right there with the Amazon Echo Kids Edition.

Seriously am going to buy a pair HomePods though soon though. Still seems better than the rest IMO.
 
I keep saying it, but they need to differentiate between "smart speaker" and "speaker with voice assistant." I think those are two distinct categories.

Personally, I like smart speakers (app controlled, with plugins for all the various APIs out there) without a voice assistant. I find most voice assistants to be super creepy, but having a speaker able to access my Spotify and such as a big plus.
 
How on earth do you expect a single mono speaker to support Atmos?

Start with mono, and if you add a second speaker you can do stereo, if you add a center speaker, two surround speakers and a sub you can have 5.1, If you add ceiling speakers or special left and right speakers that have an additional angled speaker speaker that bounces sound you have Atmos.

How do you envision a HomePod or even a pair to offer three-dimensional sound? Are you going to put five home pods around your room and hang one from the ceiling?
Just as Apple added stereo support via software update, adding surround sound to HomePod would require buying several HomePods (ideally 7 for 7.x.x) and Apple rolling out Dolby support via software update.

Obviously, overhead (x.x.4) and subwoofer (x.1.x) channels would require a design different from HomePod (unless Apple can simulate overhead channel using HomePods when they are mounted in a special way).

Either way, I frankly don't see Apple retrofiting existing HomePods for anything beyond stereo. When and if Apple makes home theater speakers, I'd imagine the product will be soundbar stryle.
[doublepost=1540233066][/doublepost]
This. It's "high" price should be $250.
I agree that lower-end HomePod should be priced between $100-150, but I don't want higher-end HomePod to be constrained by a price target.
 
Pretty expensive light switch!
I guess you could look at it that way, but considering the number of lights it not only turns on and off but also sets different scenes based on time of day and who is home or not, it would be worth it for that feature alone.

The audio quality is definitely as good if not better than anything else in the price range.

Using it for HomeKit requests and having it clearly understand what I want to add to my grocery list when I'm in the kitchen are also nice.

Overall I would definitely purchase again.
 
I don't know if I really want smart speakers, but Amazon offered me an echo dot new for $15 so I had to try one. $15 really isn't much of an investment vs $350 for apple's base model.

I'm very aware of the quality differences and have heard bigger Echo devices play msuic, but if you don't know if you really want one there is a major entry level difference.
 
Maybe I am in the minority, but I cannot imagine myself ever having one of these things in my home. Ever.

Sound bar + iOS device does the same and more for less. The value just does not add up to what it does compared to its competitors. Similarly high end speakers and audio equipment are not mainstream best sellers. Is there a market, sure. Will it replace the competitors for what it does, too early to say.
 
Amazon Echo: 23%
Amazon Echo Dot: 21%
Google Home: 8%
Google Home Mini: 7%
Amazon Echo Plus: 5%
Amazon Echo Spot: 4%
Amazon Echo Show: 4%
Amazon Echo Dot Kids Edition: 4%
Apple HomePod: 4%
Google Home Max: 2%

This makes the HomePod in 6th place...
 
I don't know if I really want smart speakers, but Amazon offered me an echo dot new for $15 so I had to try one. $15 really isn't much of an investment vs $350 for apple's base model.

I'm very aware of the quality differences and have heard bigger Echo devices play msuic, but if you don't know if you really want one there is a major entry level difference.

The question is do we really need more disposable electronics as the function is available on a smart phone. Who are these devices catered to. When phones have stereo sound that does a comparable job.

What is the point of all this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
My family all seem perfectly willing to put these speakers in their houses while I see no reason to let google or amazon record my conversations. Apple speaker is probably better on the privacy end of things, but I still don't see the doy-to-day usefulness. I have a nice home audio system with airplay, so I feel like I'm covered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marekul
Amazon Echo: 23%
Amazon Echo Dot: 21%
Google Home: 8%
Google Home Mini: 7%
Amazon Echo Plus: 5%
Amazon Echo Spot: 4%
Amazon Echo Show: 4%
Amazon Echo Dot Kids Edition: 4%
Apple HomePod: 4%
Google Home Max: 2%

This makes the HomePod in 6th place...

There is probably a decimal percentage after and that is why it’s reported as it is. This is just rounding to a whole number.
[doublepost=1540234307][/doublepost]
My family all seem perfectly willing to put these speakers in their houses while I see no reason to let google or amazon record my conversations. Apple speaker is probably better on the privacy end of things, but I still don't see the doy-to-day usefulness. I have a nice home audio system with airplay, so I feel like I'm covered.

My sound bar has BT, connects easily and it has good sound (subjective) and fills the room. Cost is not an issue, it’s value and this product does not do anything that I am able to do presently.
 
Just as Apple added stereo support via software update, adding surround sound to HomePod would require buying several HomePods (ideally 7 for 7.x.x) and Apple rolling out Dolby support via software update.

Obviously, overhead (x.x.4) and subwoofer (x.1.x) channels would require a design different from HomePod (unless Apple can simulate overhead channel using HomePods when they are mounted in a special way).

Either way, I frankly don't see Apple retrofiting existing HomePods for anything beyond stereo. When and if Apple makes home theater speakers, I'd imagine the product will be soundbar stryle.

Yes, that was part of my point. $350 X 7 = $2450. I have a Sony 5.1 receiver with Polk Audio speakers that was a fraction of that, and while I am impressed with the sound of the HomePod, a group of them are not going to sound any better than a dedicated home theater setup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.