They’ll be stunned at just how far Apple has come .... “That’s .....IT? A Bluetooth Speaker?” Ah yes. But a Bluetooth Speaker with an Apple logo AND double the price. Hello? Hello? Where they gone?![]()
Puleeze, such histrionics. Do you have anything useful to offer?NOT a bluetooth speaker even! You can't use andriod phones with it, can only stream via airplay, and not even an AUDIO IN! And SIri just sucks (another legacy of Tim's Cook AWFUL leadership).
Apple Engineers made an amazing speaker, but someone (Idiot Tim Cook) made some bad business decision (AGAIN), and really reduced the utility and sales of the device. SHAREs could be so high if TIM just left.
AND let's be honest, APPLE can afford and it does MAKE A LOT of bad business decisions, because Steve left them an amazing product basis, developed an eco system, and left a loyal customer base. ALL Tim has done was erode the good things Steve did, albeit slowly. TIM COOK MUST GO!
I almost bought one until I learned there is no Bluetooth compatibility.Bluetooth? It doesn’t even offer that feature. At the price they ask for it you’d think it would have a Bluetooth input option, but nope... nothing.
I hate how people keep trying to tell me that this thing is a bargain because of how great it sounds, there is no way Im paying that much for a speaker. Just like Im not buying a Gucci belt no matter how good the leather is.
Or just selling in another market as planned...Dumping HomePods on the Chinese because Americans don't want it .. nice
You do know that this connects via WiFi right?
Does Siri on these support a mix of languages? When I use Siri on my iPhone, which has Siri set to norwegian and I tell her to play an american song title, where everything I say is in norwegian but the title, she never gets the song right.
I imagine thats gonna be a problem with these speakers as well
Obviously you haven’t heard one , or know much about it. It’s not even a “Bluetooth speaker “. And yes it is well worth the price.They’ll be stunned at just how far Apple has come .... “That’s .....IT? A Bluetooth Speaker?” Ah yes. But a Bluetooth Speaker with an Apple logo AND double the price. Hello? Hello? Where they gone?![]()
Just because it connects via Wi-Fi doesn't mean it can't also offer a Bluetooth input option. Google, Amazon, Bose plus several other Wi-Fi connected speakers have a Bluetooth input option.
Yet the tech specs mention it has Bluetooth 5.0... very short sighted on Apple’s part to remove the feature as not everyone wants to use Apple Music.
It’s not a Bluetooth speaker in that you cannot connect a Bluetooth sound source to drive it. It has to get its source via WiFi and it never had Bluetooth for that purpose.Yet the tech specs mention it has Bluetooth 5.0... very short sighted on Apple’s part to remove the feature as not everyone wants to use Apple Music.
So, no HomePod then?No Bluetooth and line in is a deal breaker.
It’s not a Bluetooth speaker in that you cannot connect a Bluetooth sound source to drive it. It has to get its source via WiFi and it never had Bluetooth for that purpose.
Despite the fact that I have one and I do enjoy the way it sounds, I will not recommend it at its current price. It’s too limited for the money they ask for it.
They need to update this thing by adding a line input and dropping the price to $200-250.
Although he was dramatic and I disagree with his opinion of Tim Cook, I do agree that the HomePod has been, and will continue to be, a tough sell due to incompatibility with current TVs. Does Apple really want to double down on producing devices that unnecessarily remove audio ports?Puleeze, such histrionics. Do you have anything useful to offer?
An inherently lossy one. Stereo AirPlay2 is CD-quality, and if you’re streaming from a lossless-rip (as I generally do) then that’s lossless every step of the way to the air.Just because it connects via Wi-Fi doesn't mean it can't also offer a Bluetooth input option. Google, Amazon, Bose plus several other Wi-Fi connected speakers have a Bluetooth input option.