Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
At a 199.99-249.99/each price I probably would have picked one up to try out. As it stands, I just can’t justify 349.99 for this small a speaker with support for only Apple Music and missing the main features that other smart speakers already have. Just don’t see how people can justify the price premium missing all that.

$350 for a good sounding speaker is reasonable.

This speaker sounds great, is a smart speaker, can be used as an Apple home hub, Siri and more. I’d say $350 is a great buy. My wireless speaker cost $700, it has Bluetooth, AirPlay and Spotify connect, sounds excellent but that’s it. I think Apple isn’t asking too much for this, and when people take one home and try it out they’ll see just that
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kermit262
Everybody is saying the same which is great to hear.

Going to be easily the best sounding speaker on the market. Looking forward to trying it out
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Sure, but I was thinking the decoding happened locally on the source device before sending over AirPlay, so I don't know why they would explicitly state HomePod supports FLAC. Maybe it's just to ensure folks FLAC is supported in some way at least.

I prefer ALAC myself .. Works great. Apple has been quietly adding FLAC support to newer hardware. iPhone X, iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus have hardware codec support for FLAC as well as the AppleTV 4K. The only issue is the software .. right now the Files app is the only way to play FLAC files, unless you use a 3rd party app that supports FLAC. It looks like (and I'm only guessing) that devices with the Apple A10 chip or later can decode FLAC is Apple allows it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dippnerd
Talks about waiting for reviews while dismissing the hands-in experiences of people who have actually interacted with it; proceeds to pre-form their own opinions on a product despite never actually having used it in real life.

Oh I’m sorry, is Siri not available on my Mac, iPhone, iPad, watch, TV? Did my “pre-formed” opinion say Siri...or the HomePod? Pretty sure I said Siri....which I can opinionate on since it’s a wreck for me.
[doublepost=1517110467][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1517110043][/doublepost]
Your problem is just that Siri doesn’t understand redneck. :)

Yep, probably true. Shame it cannot understand the dialect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ackmondual
Because the limitation is artificial. There isn’t any reason Apple couldn’t let users choose what streaming service they want to use, or even just play from one of their devices. Apple TV users were upset at Amazon for years for not making an app compatible with ATV. there wasn’t a technical reason it was just Amazon not wanting to provide a service to a competitor. What’s the difference here, except this time it’s Apple?
It's their product and they can do whatever they want. If you don't like it look for other products. What is the problem?
 
btw, Google: homepod SiriKit, and the first article or near first should be Apple’s announcement to developers to get ready for SiriKit on HomePod.
 
Okay, let me get this right... in reality the Homepod can only play subscription music, so my complete iTunes library is totally useless except for the few dozen paid tunes?

I can't connect it to anything, like my TV or Record Player, so what is point of paying $499 Australian for something I can't really use?
 
The haters can hate. The audiophiles can proclaim that this $350 speaker does not compare with their $10,000 speakers. (Duh!) The Alexa lovers can complain that the HomePad only supports Siri. (Uh, duh.) But all I know is I'm fully enveloped in the Apple ecosystem, I'm happy, and I can't wait for my HomePod to arrive! Good times are here!
 
Free units often get good reviews. Don't want to cut the hand that feeds you right?
I'll wait for paying users to post some reviews.

True. Actually I haven‘t seen an unfavorable review for a speaker over 150 bucks for a while.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StoneJack
I know this is a rather niche request but since it's all I have/know, Im curious how it would compare to Audio Engine A5+ stereo bookshelf speakers. They're $399 for the left/right speakers and I've had them set up with my AirPort Express and television for a couple of years now and love them. Obviously a single HomePod wouldn't have the stereo separation, but I'm curious about the quality compared to something like that. I'm not an audiophile but I like good speakers, and everyone who hears mine says the sound is good.
 
Okay, let me get this right... in reality the Homepod can only play subscription music, so my complete iTunes library is totally useless except for the few dozen paid tunes?

I can't connect it to anything, like my TV or Record Player, so what is point of paying $499 Australian for something I can't really use?
You can play anytjing you like from iTunes using it as Airplay output.
[doublepost=1517111639][/doublepost]
This will go the way of the Apple HiFi, mark my words.
I still have one and sounds great.
 
There is no such thing as "true stereo sound". Stereo sound is not "true". Stereo sound is an attempt to approximate the correct listening experience by producing sound from two different positions. HomePod approximates the correct listening experience in a different way. It will not be equal to stereo sound, and it won't try to make it equal. The questions isn't whether it's the same, but whether it is as good as stereo.
Very much this. The original goal is to create a sound indistinguishable from what was heard at the original concert or in the studio (a modified goal would be to produce a sound that is perhaps less accurate, but somehow more pleasing - many arguments can be had about how wise this is). Stereo recording and playback are just one tool for attempting to create a more accurate (or more pleasing) listening experience. In the video realm, by comparison, the arrival of HDTV and 16:9 flat panel screens was a clear win over previous tech - getting you closer to movie theater experience - as was BluRay. 3D TV was definitely not a clear win. Stereo is a means to an end (more lifelike sound, where you can more clearly place the location of each instrument in your mind), but it's not the only way to achieve that. And when you get outside of classical music, most source material, most recordings have each person/instrument close-miked with the "stereo" image "created" by a sound engineer deciding how much of each track to direct to each each channel, so the "stereo imaging" is pretty artificial at that point.

One of the most amazing sound experiences I ever had was listening to a beautifully set up and properly driven pair of Apogee Duetta full-range ribbon speakers, playing parts of Dire Straits' then-new Brothers in Arms album - say what you want about the music, but it's fantastically recorded - and the sound was unbelievable in terms of just how believable it was: you could easily point to where each musician was in the room, individual notes had weight and presence... as close to having the band actually in the room as you could get. It's stuck with me for a very long time. Anyway, that was stereo imaging and sound reproduction at its finest. But the goal isn't stereo, the goal is having the result sound real (or pleasing, if you prefer that), by whatever means. Apple says they've put remarkable sound reproduction into the HomePod; I'm inclined to go listen and see if I think it's remarkable. In the meantime, it's been amusing watching folks debate (not just in this thread) about whether or not it sounds good - without having ever heard it themselves.
 
Last edited:
Lol. “Select reporters” at a “demo event”. No bias at all.
Anyone who is given early exclusive access to Apple's hardware is not going to give any strong negative comments to the product. The reason is obvious.

Also, they probably are given suggestions or instructions as to which part they should focus their reviews on.

I'm not an Apple hater obviously but these early reviews have not much substance to it.
 
I'm curious what caused the delays for release.

I imagine it had something to do with Siri enhancements / refinement. Making sure that Siri understands in various conditions. Because if there’s anything that truly needed work it’s Siri.

To others:

Also, Alexa, Cortana, and Google Assistant are allowed on iOS. I see nothing preventing them from working with SiriKit too. Granted it might be odd to say something like “Hey Siri, ask Alexa to do such and such.” lol, but I imagine the app developers will figure out a way to allow their functionality to be utilized via SiriKit (perhaps not allowing Alexa for example to respond verbally, but still allowing Amazon purchases to be made, or Google cards to be read). iOS has always been open in regard to allowing other assistants on it. It’s only Siri that’s not on other platforms.
 
So by eliminating the free unit reviewers and people who have bought them, who's left to provide a review? The haters?

That is a tough one, but just because it's hard doesn't make the other approaches any more right. Personally, I'd rather read review sites that are known on their field and areas, possibly combining feedback from multiple to get a broader picture.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.