which is why comparing any individual's output with "bad" or "good" gear is important......and when one's clients are saying "you should get better gear" then that's an indication that the current gear isn't doing what one needs it to do.
Obviously one has to know what to do with the equipment
True. In my opinion (and experience), there are the following types of musicians/music producers:
- The ones that use 20-year-old equipment because that's what they have
- The ones that use 20-year-old equipment in combination with new equipment, so as to have a more "analog" sound, among other reasons (not to say that 20-year-old equipment is "analog," but you get my point)
- The ones that use 20-year-old equipment because it's their "good trusty [insert product]."
- The ones that use only the top-end newest gear, and
- The ones that use "mid-range" but new gear
Here's the thing about producing vs performing, of which I do both. In my opinion, 90% of the time,
in producing, the hardware doesn't matter. If you use a modern OS with a relatively modern controller, etc., you're fine. BUT, in performing, you want to have up-to-date stuff, like from the past 3-4 years
since its release, not when you bought it. You want stuff with an up-to-date sound engine and fast USB connectivity in the case of an arranger keyboard. My point being that you want to have stuff that's meant for performing. For example, a stage piano. That's what they're built for. They're rugged, strong, made out of metal most of the time, and durable, whereas a "home keyboard" (like the one I have) is built out of cheap plastic, the speaker grilles are bent (because I take it on the road so much), and sometimes, it feels like the thing's about to fall apart. Not to mention its incredibly outdated sound engine, which comes straight outta a DGX-640, which is probably 15 years old at this point... Anyway, you get my point here. These are just specific examples.
Have I had "clients" (dunno if that's the appropriate word) tell me that my stuff "isn't good?" Sure I have. But I also think that some of those people are "more professional" and so they "need" that more expensive, higher-end stuff.
And I think it comes down to how frequently they work. Because say, for example (this one's true), that a guy calls me and asks me to do a video project for his church. They hand me 360p quality video that was recorded with Zoom, and ask me to cut together whatever it is (again, true story). When I'm done with the project, I talk to a guy who's been in the video industry for 20 years, and he says that my computer "isn't powerful enough." Well I tell him that I was cutting together 360p video, and he then realizes what my situation is, and says something like, "Well, [in my case], I need a higher-end computer" (because he's working with 4K). You know what I mean?
I have no idea if this is even answering or addressing your point honestly, but maybe it'll give you some more perspective.
EDIT: Because I get these "jobs" so infrequently (well compared to you guys), I really have no reason, if you think about it, to have high-end stuff.