That's what it said when I ordered mine. It arrived in about 4 days.
Hello, anybody heard anything? Also, will the iPad Pro include a stylus?
I don't understand why you're concerned about $10 stylus that you can buy separately today. Or perhaps you were asking if the iPad will be redesigned to better accommodate hand writing?
What does productivity actually mean? How can one be more productive than the other.
Especially considering there are stylists for both products. Your comment to me holds no water.
Other devices are specifically optimized for than hand writing recognition. The iPad isn't.
Well, I don't think a multibillion get there be operate on the principle of "don't feel like it."
I remembered reading an in-depth analysis of the pros and cons of different touch screen technologies. The bottom line is, if one is superior in every way without a drawback, you would think that Apple would choose to use it. It's just common sense isn't it?
What does productivity actually mean? How can one be more productive than the other.
Especially considering there are stylists for both products. Your comment to me holds no water.
For this reason, my Galaxy Note 10.1 is my work tablet, while I use my iPad rMini for everything else.
I don't think we'll ever see either a stylus or an iPad Pro from Apple.
You clearly haven't used a tablet with an active digitizer. Trying to compare the $10 foam-tipped nubs marketed as styluses, vs. and active digitizer like those found on the Galaxy Note products is like comparing a crayon and construction paper to a fine mechanical pencil and a drafting board.
The passive styluses for iPad simply don't work reliably enough to depend on for serious handwritten note-taking (including illustrations). I thought the Adonit Script Pro Evernote Edition would solve the problem, but even after a few minutes of using it I was left once again disappointed with the results. It provides only a modest improvement over all the other Bluetooth styluses marketed for iPad. The lag between writing and seeing the input appear on screen is insanely distracting. I've also tried the Pogo Bluetooth stylus which was no better than the $10 styluses on Amazon.
For this reason, my Galaxy Note 10.1 is my work tablet, while I use my iPad rMini for everything else. S-Pen is incredibly accurate and offers some excellent hover functionality that profoundly improves the usability of the stylus. I've recently purchased a Galaxy Note 8, which offers even more features. Epson offers an app that allows for video out to their projectors over wifi, so it's a great white boarding tool for sales engineers who need to present using a whiteboard.
If Apple would simply get on board and offer a Wacom display with digitizer, they'd have both the enterprise and consumer markets locked in with a single product. They simply need to get over Steve's comments about the stylus, it's been several years and the success of the Note line proves there's a market for active styluses.
Lastly, the Surface Pro 2 is consistently out of stock, so it's selling well. At roughly the same price as a loaded out iPad Air, I can assure you that it's active stylus is contributing massively to its success. Even so, I'd take an iPad with active stylus over a Surface Pro in a heartbeat.
Very unlikely .... thanks God.
I got rid of stylus on touch screens several years ago, and don't wanna go back.
You can't give options for everything.
It's a tablet, it is running iOS .... it isn't designed to run with a stylus.
It will never happen. This is the company that gave us the stupid hockey puck mouse. Even if a stylus makes all the sense in the world, Apple won't deliver.
Very unlikely!
From my experience in the Retail stores....
The stylus (At my time of work) was never present as an accessory in any of the retail stores. From my understanding was that Steve or someone from Cupertino really hated the idea of having to use a stylus for a device.
The comment was it was unnecessary and counteracts a problem opposed to resolving it. The view was why use a stylus to make something more accurate, why not make the display more responsive instead?
Therefore I see this as unlikely for anytime in the near future.
That is one of the things that helped Apple get where they are at... catering to people who have difficulty dealing with "options".You can't give options for everything.
It's a tablet, it is running iOS .... it isn't designed to run with a stylus.
Great discussion. Productivity can be achieved with an iPad and stylus, but at a sacrifice of what? Lead a meeting where the focus is on a paper schedule and be the one person on an iPad that has to move and manipulate an app to accommodate the shortcomings of the device to accomplish tasks that are simpler with pen and ink on paper. I tried to move away from paper for the savings and efficiency of emailing markups from the meeting right away. Our problem is we have a reluctance to wait in a meeting for an iPad user to catch up to the paper counterparts. As our company continues to go digital with BYOD programs, maybe we will see an accepted period of adjustments for app and or text box placement to continue note taking during the meeting flow. As of right now it is a counter flow and distraction when leading a meeting. That is not what Apple products should inspire.
Pre meeting markups are fine, it's the time required to highlight, then zoom in for legible hand written notes. Or star something and flag multiple items. I can accept an app based work around, but it has to be efficient and accurate when required to augment the work flow...
I've used iannotate, (my main go to), notability, penultimate (for hand written meeting actions), note taker, PDF expert. Each one had a strength but also a major shortcoming not known until needed in a meeting setting. I'm not trying to be the guy that says they have tried them all. I'm trying to be the guy that is looking to get the most efficient work flow for my meeting note taking requirements and combine them into a nice predictable package for my colleagues (of varying usage abilities) to adopt and master. I have given up that effort for now, but I am very interested to see others thoughts on app workarounds or eventually perhaps Apple recognizing the need for finer tools.
Paper based meeting time...
Before I retired I worked in software development. I usually lead the design meetings. Back then (2003-2004) I used the old HP 1100 windows tablet with OneNote. It had aWacom digitizer and a stylus (the stylus actually had it's own garage that charged it when not in use. I never ran out of charge even with 6+ hours a day of use). I could take handwritten notes and make drawings of screen mock-ups. Can't do that with a keyboard. Plus ideas would come fast and furious discussed and maybe dropped, maybe expanded, etc.
With OneNote I could use the handwriting-to-text and could actually circulate notes within 30 mins of the meeting. It saved me hours and hours of transcription. Even back then it did a surprisingly good job with my awful handwriting (which surprised my husband since it really is awful).
If Apple doesn't include an active digitizer they are really missing a pretty big component of the business world and even students. Think about a math or engineering class where you need to add formulas or drawings...People who don't see the need simply aren't in an occupation where it would be useful or have no imagination.
Having said all that, I doubt Apple will do it. They seem to have the entertainment segment of tablets locked up. But for productivity? Well, as MS gets it's act together they will continue to dominate the business side. iOS won't be able to compete with it's current limitations. For all we know, Apple may be content to rule the 'simple' tablet market.