I had to report the removal of a gas station (which happened years ago) - which data provider still had that gas station on record?? It hasn't been there for so long.
Oh, I'm doing Apple's work for them because they bought trash data, am I?
Well, that's pretty cool - I guess Apple Maps is now open source and the whole world will benefit from my voluntary work?
And when they'd fixed the data how are they going to make the search function work better? It's near impossible to find stuff you KNOW is on their dreadful maps using their search.
What could really make a difference is if Apple had a web based map version, just like Google.
A few years ago I remember correcting various nearby address locations on Google Maps online, because it was so easy to do on a laptop.
The problem with that (and why others like Google use crowd-sourced information) is the world's landscape - POIs and literal landscape - are changing all the time. And it obviously takes mapping companies a LONG time to map the entire planet.
So instead they let their hundreds of millions of users actively and passively submit data to keep the maps as up to date as possible. This is why Google is so much better than GPS companies like TomTom, Garmin and others. You'd get map updates every year or so with them. With Google (and now Apple) the maps are constantly being updated by their users.
It'll take time, but the only way for it to REALLY grow and mature is to have it out "in the wild."
That's great, but the simple fact is they released a product that wasn't ready. Whether it's had enough development or user feedback isn't an acceptable excuse.
Maybe it's because Tomtom is a Dutch company and I'm in living in the Netherlands, yet so far no complaints about the maps. What I do not understand is why they say this is a turn by turn navigation app, while I manually have to swipe to the next point when passing the previous one.
Android users assure me that Google Maps on their phones does really do automatic turn-by-turn. Am I overseeing something or is Apple Maps lagging in this respect?
It is if you don't know the reasons for the Apple/Google split.
If Apple needed/wanted to build their own mapping system (regardless of the reasons for doing so) it would never be as polished and "ready" as Google Maps UNTIL it had spent time in the hands of hundreds of millions of iOS users.
Now whether or not you think Apple should have ditched Google is another question. Since no one knows (except Google and Apple) the nature of their contract and why Apple decided to go its own way, I don't think its fair to bash Apple over taking control of one of the more important aspects of its OS.
From what I've read (and it seems entirely plausible), Google wouldn't allow Apple to use the data for certain things - though Apple built the app itself - such as turn-by-turn as to give the Android offering a competitive advantage. If that is the case (which I wouldn't fault Google for at all given their goal is to push Android and NOT iOS) then why would Apple continue to pay Google for data for a half-baked app that didn't have the functionality they wanted it to have?
Server fail because of number of submissions in 3.... 2.... 1....
![]()
Turn-by-turn is available in automatic, 3D mode when using the iPhone 4S or the iPhone 5.Maybe it's because Tomtom is a Dutch company and I'm in living in the Netherlands, yet so far no complaints about the maps. What I do not understand is why they say this is a turn by turn navigation app, while I manually have to swipe to the next point when passing the previous one.
Android users assure me that Google Maps on their phones does really do automatic turn-by-turn. Am I overseeing something or is Apple Maps lagging in this respect?
It is if they've tried something and can't pull it off. The fact that Google appears to have an iOS map app with turn by turn seems to indicate there were other possible solutions.
Were something like this executed well I would have no issue with them doing it. But when there are major issues with the app, as there are in this case, it either required more development or another approach.
Sometimes you aren't meant to do everything and there's nothing wrong with that. BMW makes great cars but they buy the tires from someone else because Michelin and Bridgestone do a better job at tires than they would.
To paraphrase Ian Malcom said in Jurassic Park, Apple was so preoccupied with whether or not they could do maps that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Maybe it's because Tomtom is a Dutch company and I'm in living in the Netherlands, yet so far no complaints about the maps. What I do not understand is why they say this is a turn by turn navigation app, while I manually have to swipe to the next point when passing the previous one.
Android users assure me that Google Maps on their phones does really do automatic turn-by-turn. Am I overseeing something or is Apple Maps lagging in this respect?
Yes Apple has a long ways to go before Apple Maps is competitive, but they need users to give feedback. That's they only way they can get better.
Has anyone figured out how to submit information about a business that's not already listed for inclusion in Apple's database?
EXACTLY!
i mean, how are they supposed to know that warped 3d, incorrect pictures, incorrect locations and incorrect addresses on a map are not ok if a user doesn't tell them...
Exactly the perspective the public should have. If it's done the Apple way, it WILL be brilliant. If Steve were around, it would be done quicker!![]()
what a brilliant idea. get people to work for free so that a basic feature supplied by apple works in a device sold by apple.
im not sure if i find that more or less offensive than the idea to release this crap
People shouldn't have to do apples work for them.
Roll on the return of google maps app
So basically we are forced to be beta testers
Not saying it's perfect, but I've yet to personally find any bugs using iOS 6 maps. On the flip side, I have noticed many problems and inaccuracies with Google maps and nav. Of course, I've had much more time to notice errors with Google than Apple, but I also feel like a lot of this is coming from the popular tendency "oh I've never used an Apple product before but I'm going to make fun of them because everyone else does"
If steve were around, that application wouldn't be on your phone until it is pretty much fully functional. This is apple's fault for not starting on this years back when they knew google would be a threat. Had they done that, they could've released it now instead of scrambling to fix ****.
It was never going to be ready without releasing it. Data sets that are so dependent on crowd sourcing require a crowd. Apple could have waited another year and fixed a whole host of problems, but Googles Maps would have improved at a faster rate; the gulf between Google Maps 2013 and Apple Maps would have been larger than it was this year. Outside of buying Yahoo, Google, Nokia or Microsoft Apples Maps were always going to be pretty poor on launch.
Who said Google has an iOS app with turn-by-turn?