Dang, I got a TSMC and had it replaced.. now i got a samsung chip.
Course they have way more Samsung chip phone for replacement now that so many have returned them.Dang, I got a TSMC and had it replaced.. now i got a samsung chip.
Course they have way more Samsung chip phone for replacement now that so many have returned them.
I'm in the same boat. My original 6s Plus had a TSMC chip, but every few hours it would lose the ability to connect to BlueTooth and 2.4 WiFi. I had it replaced (fixed the problem) and got a Samsung chip.
I have to say that neither phone seemed to get that good a battery life, but I think the Samsung is worse. With the Samsung I can get about 8 hours of usage per charge. For example, it's currently at 86% after 1 hour and 21 minutes of "usage", which is basically some light web browsing, mail and whatever the phone does in the background.
I only have the 6s but im thinking of returning and get the 6s plus because of the battery life. But i am thinking twice, mainly because its a huge phone. I use crutches when walking so i dont know if i will be able to hold the 6s plus with one hand if ever i need to call someone while i am walking..
It's easy to call people with one hand. Doing other things one handed is considerably more tricky.
texting?
hmm.. do you use a case on your plus?
oh they sent me a brand new one. its sealed in a retail box and it comes with charger and ear pods. My tsmc was a replacement too.. both was sent to me brand new. but the backlight on my screen has two different shade so i replace it again.
I only have the 6s but im thinking of returning and get the 6s plus because of the battery life. But i am thinking twice, mainly because its a huge phone. I use crutches when walking so i dont know if i will be able to hold the 6s plus with one hand if ever i need to call someone while i am walking..
Yes I am afraid to say that appears to be the case.. I really don't think I could have gotten much longer on the Samsung. I can only confirm I used the TSMC under heavier load..no question to that. I'm going to run the TSMC in low power mode from the 100% and do my daily routines until it dies, I'll post back with results.
oh they sent me a brand new one. its sealed in a retail box and it comes with charger and ear pods. My tsmc was a replacement too.. both was sent to me brand new. but the backlight on my screen has two different shade so i replace it again.
I only have the 6s but im thinking of returning and get the 6s plus because of the battery life. But i am thinking twice, mainly because its a huge phone. I use crutches when walking so i dont know if i will be able to hold the 6s plus with one hand if ever i need to call someone while i am walking..
Check what chip do you have first then decide if you want to return it.
Not trying to create another debate
My first 6s plus had TSMC chip and I had to exchange my phone due to screen issue, now I am using the Samsung chip. I notice battery % drain much faster than the TSMC chip phone, especially if I am browsing on safari. When it's on standby it's fine. I also notice occasional lags when unlocking or going back to home screen.
Here is a 50% check in, on pace for 15-16 hours. TSMC,Thanks for sharing and wait for your testing result.
Here is a 50% check in, on pace for 15-16 hours. TSMC, View attachment 594821 podcast is majority of usage, then browsing, messaging and email. No games or video recording yet, low power mode the whole time, acceptable brightness.
This is much longer than Samsung chip. Samsung chip is just around 8-6 hours average. Your TSMC is like double of Samsung...
Apple really loses a big branding effect for this, people paid so much but around half of the people get the "suck" version.
Apple loses so much more money from this branding lose than how much money they save from Samsung chips.
I don't believe it's double, in fairness the majority of this usage is podcasting which sips power. I also didn't run the Samsung in power save mode the entire 100% like I'm doing with the TSMC, so the comparison is not apple/apples. More or less I am testing the battery longevity of my current phone by using power save mode with minimal but typical daily use.. And its rockin so far.This is much longer than Samsung chip. Samsung chip is just around 8-6 hours average. Your TSMC is like double of Samsung...
Apple really loses a big branding effect for this, people paid so much but around half of the people get the "suck" version.
Apple loses so much more money from this branding lose than how much money they save from Samsung chips.
I really don't think the issue is as big as people are making it, especially when apples to apples comparison aren't being made. You can't say one is better than the other when on one you were doing certain things then you return it and do other things that may not be the same as the other. When you look at people doing real apples to apples comparison (excluding Benchmark) you see a 1-3% difference. I have a Samsung chip, spend 6-8 hours of usage during work which includes streaming music and podcast, surfing the Internet and playing games and I leave work with still 75% battery left. If you have a plus and getting less than 10 hours, it's not the chip and most likely something else.
The different is for real life with tsmc expect 10 to 8 hours battery life, samsung 8 to 6. That is from 0 to 4 more hours of different.