Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
~Shard~ said:
I don't think it matters whether it's an HP iPod or an Apple iPod - the use on a PC or Mac comes down to how the iPod itself is formatted. So, if the iPod was previously formatted for PC, it would have to be reformatted for Mac - regardless of whether it's an HP or an Apple iPod. That's my understanding, at least...

I know that, a previous poster was asking if Apple would make the iPod Mac only and the HP version windows only. That's I asked that, it was a rhetorical question to get him to think about it.
 
Lanbrown said:
I know that, a previous poster was asking if Apple would make the iPod Mac only and the HP version windows only. That's I asked that, it was a rhetorical question to get him to think about it.

I guess that's what I get for not reading through all the posts... ;)
 
encro said:
It's about iTunes, iTMS and the iPod combined together. Take one of those components away and it instantly loses impact and becomes a failure.

Oh please! That's most malarky I've read in this whole thread. If the iTMS goes away the iPod will do just fine. It works perfectly well as a straight mp3 player, which is probably what most people use it for anyway. And iTunes the music playing program existed long before the iTMS or the iPod, it grew to dominate the Mac mp3 application market simply because of superior ease of use and being free, other programs (thinking of Audion here) offered more features and better encoding quality earlier in the game.

The only part of this Trinity that actually needs the other two parts is the iTMS, because without the iPod there would be no business plan (like Buymusic.com and Napster) and without iTunes there would be no ease of use (and you would end up with something like Sony Connect).
 
stoid said:
I hope that this it the knock dead punch that keeps Microsoft out of the market.

I can’t decide what you are referring too. The music player industry or the online store. It’s a given they are going to make a music store one way or another.

If we are talking the player aspect of things. Hhehe. I love reading Mac user comments. MS isn't in the market when it comes to players. They provide the software. It’s the god-knows-how-many OEM's who provide the hardware and sell the product and this is what has kicked the crap out of Apple in the past. One Apple OEM isn't going to take out an industry in the long run. Apple can keep doing what they are doing but 5-10 years down the road if they remain closed remain the caterer of the entire party someone else is going to come up with something that isn't quite as good but is cheaper. And will most likely be using MS's music service.
From the software/service side of things where MS is directly involved. Are you at least a bit surprised at how little information we know about their music initiative. In fact we really know NOTHING. Know your enemy is one of the most important tips in life. You brush MS off because they haven't done anything and because Apple has all but locked up the market. Stupid move. Never underestimate MS when you don't know what they are planning and don't have a clue at just how hard they are going to go after this market. Many companies have fallen because of such arrogance. As I've stated time and again. These folks have 40 BILLION in the bank. Heck if they wanted to they could buy a label or two. Microsoft records anyone? (You can be there would be a few people lining up at the DOJ's front door for that AT suit.) My point being is that Apple needs all the friends it can get its hands on before MS actually decides to yawn, stretch, and starts to lumber around the online music industry smashing everything in its way. Apple better have a DAMN good strategy for when MS decides to enter this market.
 
I cannot wait for the day when some PC drone informs me to the fact that HP invented the HPod and that Apple stole the HPod to make its Imitation iPod. That in fact iTunes only runs on Windows and you need a Windows computer to use iTunes, because Apple suck and is incompatible and Apple just steals all the great ideas from Microsoft HP and Dell.

Think it wont happen, ask any PC genius were Word and Power-point game from. Or the mouse, or the floppy disk, or the computer GUI, etc etc...
 
Lanbrown said:
Maybe Apple has added a second manufacturer, and that one will only make the one for HP. If Apple ever wanted to increase the output of theirs, they could easily do that. A lot of companies have two manufacturing partners. Either that or the current manufacturer has started another line.

Why force a price point? If HP wants to give it away for free, Apple still gets their money. That buyer might even buy some music from iTMS. I fail to see how Apple loses in how HP prices it. If HP sells it at a loss with no purchase required, Apple might see a drop in revenue from decreased sales of the iPOD. If HP is responsible for support though, then that helps recover some of the loss by lower overhead. Apple still sees iTMS sales though. The price Apple gets from HP for every hPOD sold is the same regardless of what HP sells it for.


My second point was less to do with revenue and more to do with supplying an attractive loss-leader to a direct competitor. HP can use the HPod as a method of attractiing customers to their PCs, a style of marketing that Apple rarely uses.

I know Apple's computer sales are so low that it barely matters, but the iPod is a powerful tool for diverting the eyes of would be customers to the mac. The hPod will take away some of those eyes.
 
PS: HP Blue is quite nice. A lot of people (especially in the early days) will go for the HPod to be a little different. It will then be a well established product and you will buying a HPod or iPod depending on the colour you want or whether you will get 1 free when buying a HP PC
 
hPod sales

:confused:

Well according to one recent Reuters article, at least one crack-smoking analyst is suggesting that hPod sales will quickly outstrip iPod sales. Supposedly, this is because of HP's large distribution channels.

While the HP branded iPod will certainly appeal to some people who prefer something less cool than the Apple brand and may not want to be associated with us Apple zealots, I can't see people buying hPods in droves.

Also, if there is such a demand for iPods that Apple can't keep up the supply, how is HP's sales going to outstrip Apple's???

And, well, there is just the image thing... How many people would buy a BMW if Ford started selling them under the Ford name AND for the same price?

I'm sure the hPod will do fine, but I'm betting it doesn't really take off and that there will be hPods sitting on store shelves while people are still waiting for the iPods they ordered.

:cool:
 
CHess said:
:confused:

Well according to one recent Reuters article, at least one crack-smoking analyst is suggesting that hPod sales will quickly outstrip iPod sales. Supposedly, this is because of HP's large distribution channels.


I'm sure the hPod will do fine, but I'm betting it doesn't really take off and that there will be hPods sitting on store shelves while people are still waiting for the iPods they ordered.

:cool:

The one smoking crack is possibly the one wrote this :)

If HP with tens of thousands of outlets cant shift truckloads of HPods there is something seriously wrong. Also there would be something seriously wrong if HP agreed to this deal without an assurance from Apple that they could supply this little goldmine device in the right numbers. Whichever way you look at it, for the forseeable future, Apple are going to be able to sell absolutely every device they can produce. On the one side, the posh iPods will be for those seeking Apple cool, whilst the HPods, probably bundled in a "killer" deal with PCs, will pander to the ones who want to be cool but for a perceived lower price.
 
~Shard~ said:
I don't think it matters whether it's an HP iPod or an Apple iPod - the use on a PC or Mac comes down to how the iPod itself is formatted. So, if the iPod was previously formatted for PC, it would have to be reformatted for Mac - regardless of whether it's an HP or an Apple iPod. That's my understanding, at least...

Yes and no. If it is formatted for Apple, will only work on a Mac. If formatted for Windows, will work on a PC and a Mac.
 
iDave said:
Um, Apple will sell to HP at slightly below retail just like they sell to PC Connection, MacMall or Best Buy. HP makes money on the markup. Apple still makes money, just a little less than if they sell directly from their own stores or website.

So, do you suppose the hPod will have blue earbuds and wires? Will Griffin make a blue hTrip FM transmitter?

The fact that only 50% of iPod sales are currently to WinPC users says something. With HP onboard selling them, perhaps that number will increase to 80% or something which makes more sense, considering the number of WinPC users. And soon, World Domination!
:eek:

I highly doubt HP will be paying Apple's standard wholesale price. HP still has to sell them wholesale and allow a markup at retail.
 
quackattack said:
i know i wouldn't want an ipod that said HP on it. apple certianly wouldn't allow this to have any features that the current ipods don't have.

this is simply a marketing move to get a new distribution channel for the ipod. i hope it doesn't backfire and cheapen the ipod's image.

The reason Apple is doing this is that HP is the #2 computer maker. They move a lot of units. Don't forget that HP is also preinstalling itunes on every new computer they make.

It would be assinine for Apple to NOT make the HP version of the ipod the exact same.
Could you imagine the conversation between Jobs and Fiorina....
Gee Carly, we really appriciate the fact that HP wants to bring their market clout over to the perceived little guy and help us move thousands of additional ipods that we might not be able to move on our own. Simply due to lack of exposure. However, we need to protect our existing users... Therefore, we are going to give you a model that is equivalent to a Chevette...

Carly's response: F*** you Steve, we will just cobrand with Creative and call it a day, but thanks for listening to our proposal that could potentially help crush the competition.


C'mon y'all, if for no other reason than a HUGE windows based company realizing the potential of this and most importantly BLOCKING Redmond from pushing more of their junk on the OEM's, this is a historic and great day for Apple!!!
 
jacobj said:
My second point was less to do with revenue and more to do with supplying an attractive loss-leader to a direct competitor. HP can use the HPod as a method of attractiing customers to their PCs, a style of marketing that Apple rarely uses.

I know Apple's computer sales are so low that it barely matters, but the iPod is a powerful tool for diverting the eyes of would be customers to the mac. The hPod will take away some of those eyes.

Dude, the precise reason for a device like the ipod is to turn people onto the digital lifestyle. The iPod was desiged specifically to lure people over to Apple and give them a reason to at least look at the hardware.

ie. Die hard windows user decides to step up and be cool for once in their life and get an ipod. Is soo impressed with it that they decide to disguse themself and hit the local Apple store. While in the apple store is so impressed with the eye candy and performance and stabillity of the machines, not to mention all of the cool stuff he can do so easily with them, he decides to switch.

That, in addition to gobs of profit, is the reason for the ipod..........
 
Ok,

The iPod is now available on Hp's shopping site. They are selling both of the current ipods (20 & 40 gig). Nothing about them is different except that its call Apple Ipod for HP.

Basically, all there are doing is reselling the ipod and including itunes on their computers. iPod's are white and normal looking. Available September 15th.

I want to hear about the TV's HP is coming out with today. Maybe they'll be alright.

Thats the news.
 
rdowns said:
Yes and no. If it is formatted for Apple, will only work on a Mac. If formatted for Windows, will work on a PC and a Mac.

Yeah, true, but IMHO it doesn't matter to which format it's formatted, you can format it again to either.
 
webmatthijs said:
Anyone going to see the webcast?
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Guess I won't be watching the webcast:

Internet Explorer 5 or higher, and
a Windows operating system are
required to view this webcast.


Please try to re-enter the webcast in
*Windows and in Internet Explorer.
 

Attachments

  • webcast.jpg
    webcast.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 112
rdowns said:
I highly doubt HP will be paying Apple's standard wholesale price. HP still has to sell them wholesale and allow a markup at retail.
True; since Apple is making iPods specifically for HP with the HP logo and this licensing deal, there probably is special pricing as well. Chances are, Apple sacrifices another $15 per unit (just guessing). HP's dealers have to make a buck too.
 
Hpod will not be blue

Funny to see all this pontificating about the "blue" color of the hPod. It's not going to be blue. I guess we'll wait and see in just a few minutes, but I suspect it will look just like a regular iPod, but just with the HP logo on the back.
 
Pretty pathetic that they are launching a rebranded Apple product and have excluded anyone that isn't using Satan's operating system from viewing the webcast.
 
problems with webcast?

is anyone besides me having problems viewing the webcast? It says that I need to be running Windows and have IE.....I tried in both Mozilla and Safari with luck....Help!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.