Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You must have MASSIVE hands to hold a 6 inch phone with one hand and have your index finger in the middle of it!

Really? the center point of my thumbprint to the center point of my pointer finger is approximately 4 inches. I'd say that's about average.
 
It's really stupid to think this device was designed after the 5S came out. And the iPhone wasn't by far the first phone featuring a fingerprint sensor.

Nice try, kid.
Uh, where have you been? This site had pictures of the sensor components for the iPhone 5S long before the announcement for the unveil came out.

As early as August 2012, we had hints that Apple was going to incorporate a fingerprint sensor in a new product.
https://www.macrumors.com/2012/08/1...-adoption-of-fingerprint-scanning-technology/

Later, we saw hints of it in iOS 7 betas, leaked parts for the 5S showing a new home button type.

Also, this new HTC phone is a relatively minor update for their previous model. Considering how they haphazardly placed and implemented the sensor, I would guess that it was a rush job as a "me too" feature added at the last minute after we started seeing leaked parts for the new 5S home button which all but confirmed that we would see it in the 5S.
 
Um, the 5s needs to be awake from sleep to be able to use it's fingerprint sensor too. :confused:

EDIT: I get that it's a one step process though. Pushing the button is essentially the same step as keeping your finger there for scanning.

The 5s is still better, you press the same button, no flipping the phone over, no smugging the the camera lens and no special case to make it work.

I know Apple won't make a 'our scanner is better' advert but can't wait until they test and see which one is quicker, given the extra steps for the HTC.
 
Yes, while this is true, it can technically be considered as a "1 step process" or 1.5 step process if you will. When unlocking, you can if you please just place your finger there, press the home button and let your finger rest. Definitely not as cumbersome as this is.

It is definitely one step on the iPhone. Click home button while keeping your finger on it after the click. Phone unlocked and at home screen. It's even faster than opening an iPhone with no passcode set, as I don't even have to wake and swipe. I love it.
 
I'm waiting for a copy of the letter Sen. Al Franken sent to Apple to go to HTC regarding fingerprint data privacy.
 
I really hate to have to stereotype certain fanboys, but this thread had just turned into a full iSheep war post. The Motorola Atrix long had the fingerprint sensor before Apple even thought of the idea. Less than a month after Apple copied the idea themselves, another company made a phone with a fingerprint sensor and now everybody is pissed that they copied Apple's "original" idea. These sort of posts really damage the reputation of fellow Apple users, me included.
 
Hate to bust your bubble but I had a finger scanner on my 4 year old android phone. Also any phone with a touchscreen can act as a finger scanner. Sorry Apple didnt invent anything at all.

Well TID is far superior. I had trouble at first calibrating, or using it, since I'm used to the old versions where you press hard and always at the same spot... Once I re-read anand review, I got it. Works every time now and you don't have to be exact where you press.
 
Well TID is far superior. I had trouble at first calibrating, or using it, since I'm used to the old versions where you press hard and always at the same spot... Once I re-read anand review, I got it. Works every time now and you don't have to be exact where you press.

He wasn't talking about quality, just the idea that people are copying Apple if they have fingerprint scanning on a phone.
 
You're arguing semantics. I never said you had to press multiple buttons or make multiple gestures or movements.

Fact is, you have to first PRESS the home button (which wakes the device) so the fingerprint can be read. You can't simply leave the finger on the home button.

Relax.....I'm not attacking Apple. Simply pointing out that part of the argument isn't valid - unless you expound on multiple touches (which I'd say has more to do with where the button is located - which is addressed.)

Jesus - have you seen me around here? I get bashed all the time for being too pro-Apple.....lol can't win for losing.

Actually you were the one arguing semantics here. To the user, Apple's implementation requires one step. You're saying it technically requires two, which is irrelevant because the user's experience is all that matters. Your line of reasoning is as close to a perfect example of arguing semantics as you can get.
 
HTC beat Samsung this time in copying Apple :p

Not really, The motorola Atrix had a fingerprint sensor before apple did. The problem is that its not popular until apple does it. Other companies know that apple will stick with it, improve it, and use it across their entire line of products. The fingerprint sensor was also used on some computers in the past.
 
So to use this you have to turn the phone over, that's convenient :rolleyes:

Uh, no. Hold a phone facing you. Your forefinger should be able to easily move to the middle top rear.

Since the beginning of fingerprint sensors on handhelds, this has been one of the locations that is often used.

Another is on the front below the screen, as Apple did.

Another sensor position that's possible, but is rarely used, is along an edge.
 
I say again, there's no way HTC got this done since the iPhone announcement. It has obviously been in the works for months, and recent leaks support that fact.

So it's not another "Android copy", it's just a badly implemented finger print scanner lol.
 
Uh, no. Hold a phone facing you. Your forefinger should be able to easily move to the middle top rear.

Since the beginning of fingerprint sensors on handhelds, this has been one of the locations that is often used.

Another is on the front below the screen, as Apple did.

Another sensor position that's possible, but is rarely used, is along an edge.


can't wait for someone to justify having the home button on the back of a phone.
 
I guess you can forget getting a case for your HTC Max phone?

What a dumb place to put the sensor. It's like putting your car's ignition key in the trunk. Silly.

Not going to buy that horrible phablet but .... Apple's case for iPhone 4/4s was a bumper, covering only edges ...
 
Next up - A fingerprint sensor on Samsung's smart watch that is located on the back of the watch
 
As Bertrand Serlet once said, you can imitate but it's never quite as good as the original.

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-2C2gb6ws8

Well, define "original", in this case. Fingerprint sensors aren't new, even on smartphones (Atrix anyone?). The difference is that Apple was the first to include a functional fingerprint "scanner" in a smartphone. HTC is trying to ride the Touch ID wave of success/popularity/consumer-awareness of smartphone fingerprint scanners, and it appears they've done a piss poor job of it which, arguably, is the more offensive part. I do agree with a comment above in that I'm surprised HTC, and not Samsung, was first to jump on this fingerprint sensor bandwagon.
 
HTC's scanner may be bad, screen size is too big but overall phone design is way nicer than the last two iPhone iterations. And HTC doesn't have Jony Ive.
 
For the same reason Motorola never did it again: It was a crap gimmick that nobody really cared about. The Motorola phone was a commercial failure as the fingerprint scanner was pretty much its only feature.

Maybe Apple can 'do it right' this time though.
Apple already did, since iPhone 5s already sold in millions ....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.