Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Nielsen’s Anywhere Anytime Media Measurement initiative (A2/M2) – show that the average American watches approximately 153 hours of TV every month at home"

153 * 2GB for every hour is 306 GB of data. So yes, I do believe that some people will find issues with Comcast's cap on internet data.

I estimated 2GB using my most recent downloads from iTunes as reference. Cars was 1.78GB and is 1 hour and 56 min. Monsters Inc was 1.39 and is 1 hour and 32 min.


Wouldn't that be about 1gb an hour?
 
You can now, its called Boxee.

I believe that is actually a "Sort of". I looked into this recently and, if my info is still correct, Hulu blocks Boxee.

You can get Boxee to work if you set up a Proxy server that makes it look like the request is coming from a Firefox browser instead of the Boxee browser. But that requires having a dedicated computer. In a house with only two laptops, it's not guarenteed that one will be on at all times.

If you know of updated info of getting Hulu through Boxee I'd be very interested.
 
All of your points are valid, but the fact that they are asking us to pay $10 a month for content that still has ads is just stupid. I'm not saying someone shouldn't get paid, I'm simply saying this model sounds idiotic, and I'm not going to pay to also watch ads.

I already do that with my cable service.

The reason why you do it for your cable service is licensing fees. Hulu wasn't paying them before. I guarantee you they aren't seeing all $10 that comes to them, rather a large chunk will be paid to the content companies as fees so that Hulu can continue to show the tv shows.
 
"Nielsen’s Anywhere Anytime Media Measurement initiative (A2/M2) – show that the average American watches approximately 153 hours of TV every month at home"

153 * 2GB for every hour is 306 GB of data. So yes, I do believe that some people will find issues with Comcast's cap on internet data.

I estimated 2GB using my most recent downloads from iTunes as reference. Cars was 1.78GB and is 1 hour and 56 min. Monsters Inc was 1.39 and is 1 hour and 32 min.

Um, 1.78 GB for 116 minutes of video is 922 MB per hour. Since Hulu "hour-long shows" are only about 45 minutes (with ads), that's 691 MB per show. 153 TV hours * 691 MB per each of those hours = 105 GB... no where near Comcast's 250 GB cap.
 
Not jazzed about 10 bucks / month with advertisements... but, I'll experiment with and support any cable alternative for at least 30 days.

I'd prefer to own all my content, but for casual viewing, this could be decent.

Update: Not only does the app not support fast switching, but after it reloads, and drops back into the episode I was watching, it forgets where you left off. How inconvenient.
 
App Looks Great on the iPhone 4

pay ten bucks a month to watch TV on a mobiles device and be subject to their irritating advertisements?

Ahhhhhhhh, nope!

I'm trying the free app now on my iPhone 4 via 3g and it looks incredible. Watching 30 Rock for free!
 
If I have to pay for stuff that has been free but it looks the same, WITH ADS, then no sale! :mad:

Murdock has jump off the deep end and gone very greedy! As others have said this is more expensive that Netflix!

I sure hope this goes down in flames!
 
I swear some people really are IDIOTS. As someone already posted earlier (but it was largely ignorned, apparently) TV COMMERCIALS=REVENUE FOR COMPANIES THAT MAKE TV SHOWS (ABC, CBS, etc). SATELLITE or CABLE TV BILLS=REVENUE FOR SATELLITE/CABLE COMPANIES (COMCAST, DIRECTV, etc,). HULU ADS=REVENUE FOR COMPANIES THAT MAKE TV SHOWS, while HULU SUBSCRIPTION FEE=REVENUE FOR HULU (Revenue that has to be used for DIGITAL CONVERSION, STORAGE, SERVERS, TECHNICIANS, etc.) Not to mention the fact that HULU PLUS OFFERS MORE TV SHOWS THAN REGULAR HULU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I mean, damn, people act like just because its on the internet money isn't required to make it work, like people don't have to (and don't want to) get paid.

I wholeheartedly agree. I just canceled Directv last month - basic service with a DVR was 85/month. I could skip commercials of course with the DVR but it wasn't worth it to me to pay that much. I have an iPad and can't watch Hulu at the moment so we do Netflix. Netflix doesn't have the same amount of tv programming. So I may or may not shell out another $10/month but it sounds reasonable to me. It's way cheaper than cable or satellite.

Everyone wants something for nothin'. Freakin' crybabies.
 
Sound files are very large. Hulu is not giving you 7.1. They have multpule sound tracks on them and they are in 1080p not 720p.

SD video files are SMALLER then 720p video files, 720p video files are smaller then 1080p video files.

Thats what i was getting at. and if each video file is using the same codec. Even if you was to add in a single sound file it would be the same, SD takes less bandwidth to stream then HD content does.
 
What?!?!?!

"Hulu Plus is a new, revolutionary ad-supported subscription product"

If it's "ad-supported" then why am i paying a subscription fee? Umm, sorry, no, not gonna do that. If I am paying for the service I better not be seeing ads!
 
Hulu for me is a place to watch shows I missed via the subscriptions feature for free. I don't need shows 5 season back, I just need the last 2 epsiodes. What they should have done was make two verisions of Hulu, Hulu Free and Hulu Plus.

Hulu Free should give you more ads and only the last 2 episodes of each show.
Hulu Plus should give you more episodes of each show and less ads.
 
Here is the difference --

Ads in a magazine or newspaper, and some DVDs, I can easily skip over. However ads in Hulu are locked. You can't skip over them. Now when they are giving free product as they currently do, fair enough. No complaint. But when I'm paying $10 then they need to at least allow me to skip the ad if I don't want to watch it.

They still offer the same content for free with ads. The $10 gets you the old episodes (instead of the last 5 episodes currently available on free hulu). If you want free you've got it.
 
Let's simplify the math and say 1GB per hour of high quality streaming. Actually, we'll be very generous and say 2GB per hour. That's still 25 hrs per week of streaming video, and another 50GB of misc. internet usage. You think people will go over that? Again, that's being generous. More realistically it's closer to double that.

Wouldn't that be about 1gb an hour?

I am making an assumption, have yet to download an HD movie and am not sure what the difference would be but I am sure there would be one.. both Cars and Monsters were SD.

Plus I am not figuring in the amount of data exchange from browsing the web, email, and buying music. I don't have a source on the number or amount of data a typical person accumulates in a mount.

What also needs to be taken into consideration is the number of people in the household and the number of devices in use. So I still say that reaching the 250GB data cap in a month is possible if a someone/household was to just only rely on internet streaming for TV.
 
Well I downloaded the app for iPhone 4 and requested a code (I was a Hulu beta tester first go round, hope that means something now). It plays videos just like youtube, just with commercials.

As far as the $10 per month, I liken it to cable TV. Even the Cable Networks show ads. It is just part of the business, and Hulu's ads are normally just one product, unlike TV where you have two minutes worth of stuff at every break.

I think this can work, but I will reserve full comment until I get a chance to experience it.
 
If I have to pay for stuff that has been free but it looks the same, WITH ADS, then no sale! :mad:

Murdock has jump off the deep end and gone very greedy! As others have said this is more expensive that Netflix!

I sure hope this goes down in flames!

Everything that was free, is still free. None of the current TV shows that are available for free oin Hulu are available on Netflix.
 
I think this would have worked if this was the beginning of the streaming video revolution. I see it not catching on too much, not without all the shows (CBS, Comedy Central, maybe CW).

The thing that sticks with me is that dumb Hollywood and the old cronies with their busniess models have DRM'd us and limited us so much (legally) on what and when we can watch it, that I have adapted. I only watch free Hulu and catch the episodes most recent before they go away. CBS streams from CBS. Netflix is for netflix, etc.

So now that they finally introduce something for a subscription price that has "everything" it really doesn't fit into my DRM/limit lifestyle. Now if for the pay service you got CBS, Comedy Central, Viacom, etc.. then that would be a bonus that might be worth considering possibly.
 
Um, 1.78 GB for 116 minutes of video is 922 MB per hour. Since Hulu "hour-long shows" are only about 45 minutes (with ads), that's 691 MB per show. 153 TV hours * 691 MB per each of those hours = 105 GB... no where near Comcast's 250 GB cap.

Sure, when you actually do the math.. hehe.. Thanks for taking the time to break that down for me :) I see my flaw.

But still.. what if there are two people in the household.. that gets us to 210 GD of TV watched leaving only 40 GB of data for regular internet. So there could still be an issue for people/households that move to internet streaming TV only. Either way, I am sure Comcat will cry poor and put their hands out for more money.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.