No, ABC, Fox and NBC.
That would be most of the US Networks..
No, ABC, Fox and NBC.
For those who state that your cable bill goes entirely to the cable co's infrastructure, you could not be more wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_television_in_the_United_States#Subscriber_Fees
Wait what ???
if that was the case then why are we not using DVD disks for HD movies ?
So your calling the people that cant really afford the extra $10 a month cheapos, i only pay for internet (not cable TV), Car insurance, Rent for apartment, Food, Electric, Gas, Water, Garbage, Renters insurance, Gas for car, or other Needed Things. It all adds up at the end of the month.
I had to buy most of my stuff by saving up to buy it, or by using my income tax check to buy it outright.
Not everyone has access to the job you have.
oh my gosh....a wikipedia page...it must be 100% true. HA HA HA
it'll be interesting to see how this is integrated into a rumored iOSTV.
btw, speaking of this app not being in the app store yet, a question: when i bought my iP4 last week i hooked up my computer in the store to sync all my data to my new phone, which gave me plenty of time to explore the store. The iPad i played with had an app called iPad Guide. It was a useful compilation of iPad tips. I can't find it on the app store. It seems odd apple would be promoting its device in-store with an app that's not publicly available. Has anyone heard of it? Can you point me to it? Thanks.
Any one that knows anything about the financial part of tv knows this is double dipping. The advertisers are the ones that pay for these commercial shows to be on tv. Duh! Hence the term "commercial". Now here come ABC wanting to charge $10.00 a month for shows that were already paid for. The Neilson Families did their thing and the money was made for the advertisers and the network.
ABC must be crazy!
Lets say 20 million folks subscribe to HULU. That is $200 million a month for intermittently laced, non-scrubbable commercial supported programs?
HEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
"Nielsen’s Anywhere Anytime Media Measurement initiative (A2/M2) – show that the average American watches approximately 153 hours of TV every month at home"
153 * 2GB for every hour is 306 GB of data. So yes, I do believe that some people will find issues with Comcast's cap on internet data.
I estimated 2GB using my most recent downloads from iTunes as reference. Cars was 1.78GB and is 1 hour and 56 min. Monsters Inc was 1.39 and is 1 hour and 32 min.
I have Netflix , I pay a monthly subscription fee for and no adds, why should I pay for ads from Hulu Plus.
G-
Well, no, I don't have cable, actually. If the ads are minimal, I think $10/mo sounds a lot better than the $70/mo I'm not paying Comcast for standard cable.
And support for PS3? Nice. (Can you get Hulu free on PS3 at the moment? I don't think so, and it's not just a Flash issue, right?)
So far, PS 3 is the most affordable HTPC that I can think of. Downside is no Hulu. But if I could do Hulu for $10/mo I probably would, even without the expanded library of content. Again, that's way less than $70/mo for Comcast.
Makes me more interested in PS3 for my HTPC.
So you pay $10 a month to get the same feed with commercials? They can keep it.
People the reason cable has both is cause ads pay the makers of the show when the bill pays for the hardware and bring the shows to your tv. Hulu dosnt do that second thing. That's your Internet provider
Yes, a shame this is getting missed. I think a lot of folks probably have no clue that you can receive HD channels in your home with no cable TV service whatsoever. You just have to buy your TV, HD antenna, and pay your electric bill.