Pretty sure HAL9000 didn’t need TouchID. Kind of cool that our computers will be able to recognize our faces.
Yes Halloween masks are such an inconvenience once a year on the fraction of people who wear them whom will have to simply enter their passcode instead. Just as those previously who've worn costume gloves would've had to with Touch ID.[doublepost=1504498544][/doublepost]
Well, if that’s the case, I hope everyone enjoys their $3000 iPhone and when all the people want to dress up for costume parties and such for holidays then I hope their costume masks aren’t any inconvenience. Also, behind every FaceID and Fingerprint scanner is a password for fail safe. There are knowledgeable persons in the world with the technology that can get around these. Been there and done that. Me ignorant? Not conclusively. Skeptical of rumors and downfalls? Yes
Wait so why won't you be using facial recognition?I guess it would be an improvement to the people who cared about it, but I don’t have any problems getting into my phone fast enough using TouchID. I guess I study on more real life things instead of trying to improve it taking longer than half a sec to enter my phone with my fingerprint scanner. I won’t be using android and I won’t be using facial recognition.
Yes Halloween masks are such an inconvenience once a year on the fraction of people who wear them whom will have to simply enter their passcode instead. Just as those previously who've worn costume gloves would've had to with Touch ID.
Knowledgeable persons in the world huh? 99.999% of people will not have their passcode hacked. The FBI couldn't even hack iPhones. Try again with something that actually hinders and is a practical problem.
[doublepost=1504502369][/doublepost]
Wait so why won't you be using facial recognition?
Oh and one more thing. When the FBI was trying to get into that guys phone, I bet they could’ve forced him to use facial recognition, but they couldn’t force him to use his passcode. I just feel it may not he as secure as everyone thinks. I may be wrong.Mainly because I can get into my phone plenty fast enough using fingerprint. It really only takes as long as picking up my phone to unlock it. Also, I don’t need anyone in my household holding my phone up to my face while I’m sleeping to be nosey. If they touch my finger to it then I’ll wake up. I just see it as I can enter my phone just as fast using my fingerprint as I could using FaceID scanning. I also can just push the power button 5 times before bed to disable TouchID. Now having FaceID on a Mac wouldn’t be bad at all, but on the iPhone/iPad part, I just find it more costly and not any more useful than TouchID. I bet by the time it scans your face, my fingerprint will have my phone unlocked.
Whether they bring it back or not depends on how successful FaceID is. If it bombs hard and there's serious customer backlash, they'll have to swallow their pride and bring it back. But if it's even a moderate success, they'll take that and never look back, focusing on ways to improve it.
In a way that have brought back a discarded feature in the past; the 4" phone (SE). Realistically they probably just had a bunch of 5s shells that they needed to get rid of, and they wanted to introduce a less expensive iPhone, but they spun it by saying that they recognized that many of their customers still preferred a smaller phone and it's all about giving people choice. They could spin bringing back TouchID the same way.
Firstly, Touch ID is reportedly gone and if that is true, it will not come back to any future iPhones. Secondly, Touch ID works perfectly and Face ID wasn't designed as a necessarily superior methodology in terms of ease-of-use, but rather, a means of security in the abscence of Touch ID due to the difficulties in getting Touch ID under the display. Also, Face ID is highly likely more secure, and it reportedly works in milliseconds, and therefore it will likely be faster than Touch ID, and it will likely be more accurate as well (although Touch ID is basically 99% accurate).Mainly because I can get into my phone plenty fast enough using fingerprint. It really only takes as long as picking up my phone to unlock it. Also, I don’t need anyone in my household holding my phone up to my face while I’m sleeping to be nosey. If they touch my finger to it then I’ll wake up. I just see it as I can enter my phone just as fast using my fingerprint as I could using FaceID scanning. I also can just push the power button 5 times before bed to disable TouchID. Now having FaceID on a Mac wouldn’t be bad at all, but on the iPhone/iPad part, I just find it more costly and not any more useful than TouchID. I bet by the time it scans your face, my fingerprint will have my phone unlocked.
doubt it'll bomb tho. i mean, this is apple. they wont be releasing a major feature, a security feature nonetheless, if it isnt anything short of a success.
Firstly, Touch ID is reportedly gone and if that is true, it will not come back to any future iPhones. Secondly, Touch ID works perfectly and Face ID wasn't designed as a necessarily superior methodology in terms of ease-of-use, but rather, a means of security in the abscence of Touch ID due to the difficulties in getting Touch ID under the display. Also, Face ID is highly likely more secure, and it reportedly works in milliseconds, and therefore it will likely be faster than Touch ID, and it will likely be more accurate as well (although Touch ID is basically 99% accurate).
Lastly, the sleeping issue people have suggested could be solved by Face ID not unlocking if it detects the eyes are not opened. If you were asleep it would not unlock, it's really a simple conclusion I came to in like 10 seconds when I first saw someone suggest that. And no, a blinking of the eyes when awake would be of no consequence since it would be scanning for at least a second, if not constantly in certain circumstances.
As Apple is very committed to equality and diversity, I wonder what unlocking feature they will have for
people who cover their faces for religious reasons.
They have done in the past, and really they are not removing this from the lineup. They are removing it from one model because they don't have a choice. They didn't want to remove it, and there is no reason why it wouldn't come back next year after their work on it.Apple doesn't have a tendency to bring back things they previously removed.
They have done in the past, and really they are not removing this from the lineup. They are removing it from one model because they don't have a choice. They didn't want to remove it, and there is no reason why it wouldn't come back next year after their work on it.
Odd response v3rlon but you make some good points.
That must be why this was implemented in iOS 11>>>
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2017/08/18/cops-fingerprints
On and off for the past few years. Mostly in digital photography section. I drift through here around September each year.@v3rlon Have you always been here?
On and off for the past few years. Mostly in digital photography section. I drift through here around September each year.
As Apple is very committed to equality and diversity, I wonder what unlocking feature they will have for
people who cover their faces for religious reasons.
Just curious... what are cops looking for when they look through your phone? Or the TSA at the airport?
I guess I subscribe to the theory "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear"
I'm not gonna sit in a jail cell for ANY length of time because I refuse to let cops look through my phone... especially if there's nothing on it.
I can understand if you DO have criminal evidence on your phone and you want to protect yourself. That's fine.
But the average user?
How many of us here fall into the category of criminal?
[doublepost=1504561449][/doublepost]I think this new iphone releasing in a few weeks will be a One-Off phone. An Anniversary edition if you will. it will not be called the Iphone 8, but instead a monikor like, Pro, X, or Anniversary Edition.
They threw all the new tech they can at it that is currently available and upcharged for it. This means no under the screen TouchID for now.
Next year when the True "8" releases it will include many of the new features on the Anniversary edition, but will include under the screen TouchID (hopefully they got it figured out by then), and face scanner. by that time the tech will be cheaper, and the 8 will come back down in pricing, much like the price the 7S will be.
That is my prediction, and will bump it in a year.
[doublepost=1504561571][/doublepost]Touch ID may not be gone from this model. After all is that larger power button just for convenience. And we've seen Samsung put Touch ID in a buttonI think this new iphone releasing in a few weeks will be a One-Off phone. An Anniversary edition if you will. it will not be called the Iphone 8, but instead a monikor like, Pro, X, or Anniversary Edition.
They threw all the new tech they can at it that is currently available and upcharged for it. This means no under the screen TouchID for now.
Next year when the True "8" releases it will include many of the new features on the Anniversary edition, but will include under the screen TouchID (hopefully they got it figured out by then), and face scanner. by that time the tech will be cheaper, and the 8 will come back down in pricing, much like the price the 7S will be.
That is my prediction, and will bump it in a year.
You should watch some news from around the world. Turkey, for example. Thousands of people became "criminals" overnight, without doing anything wrong. It could happy everywhere, because the definition of "something to hide" can change quickly, depending on who is in charge. Don't take a free society with an independent judicial system for granted, especially not these days, not even in the U.S.
You have the right not to incriminate yourself. If the cops or DA want to go on a fishing expedition to see if they can find anything to stick.Just curious... what are cops looking for when they look through your phone? Or the TSA at the airport?
I guess I subscribe to the theory "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear"
I'm not gonna sit in a jail cell for ANY length of time because I refuse to let cops look through my phone... especially if there's nothing on it.
I can understand if you DO have criminal evidence on your phone and you want to protect yourself. That's fine.
But the average user?
How many of us here fall into the category of criminal?