Oh God not again!

More seriously, I already waited till the past WWDC (and I was disappointed), and I'm quite sure I can't wait not so longer anymore.
My MBP is not really dying, actually I'm quite surprised it can still somehow work... but battery is gone, and GPU too.
I need something new.
There are people who could probably wait, and there are people who are long due for an upgrade. You seem like the latter.
No, the next MBP will not be a spectacular upgrade over this one. The CPU will be slightly faster, the GPU - knowing AMD - will be a slightly faster rebranding, and the battery life - even if all that layered talk is true - will be just a bit better. People are setting themselves up for disappointment every year, expecting one thing and getting another. I could be wrong, of course, but I doubt it. We'll see in October.
The only sound advice is the one I heard a long time ago: better computers are always coming, so get the one you need, when you need it - otherwise you'd end up waiting.
I'm not saying that your new computer has to be a new MBP. Perhaps you'd like the old one. Perhaps you'd like a Windows laptop. But I am sorry that all this negativity has scared you from a very good machine. From what I can see, you do want the new MBP, the latest and greatest Apple laptop, so - you'll most likely enjoy the new one.
[doublepost=1482604759][/doublepost]
Listen, it just isn't. I don't want to disprove your statement by offering anecdotal evidence of my own. It's just word against word.
You're sooo right. They won't. They will rush it because the product does not live up to Apple standards. Not because of a few Macrumors posters and clickbait bloggers. That is also the reason they won't listen to one Macrumors poster that says them to release new version in next November and no earlier.
So, you're thinking they are going to send a message to all those customers that just bought the MBP that they made a mistake, by releasing something much better in 6 months time? That would cause even more outrage.
As for the battery, I can only tell you what my experiences are. Quite true, Skylake is only better at low demanding tasks. Start something intense, and it's advantage all but disappears. However, with lower spending in screen, GPU and even the CPU combined, the difference with really demanding tasks is, in my measurements, one hour less. I can get 5 hours of Photoshop painting instead of 6. And I get 11 hours of movie watching instead of 10.
Whether you call that "much worse" battery or "similar" battery life - it's up to you. I agree - I expected more, not less. I was hoping to get 7 hours of Photoshop use, somehow, instead I actually got
less than what I had. But it's not like Apple is having an emergency meeting over this, and are changing their standard release schedules because people on Macrumors think they should fire Tim Cook. It is much less dramatic than people here think - especially for Apple, who is looking at sales charts, reports, etc.
But ok, whatever, really - I spend too much time here. If you disagree, let's part on that. We'll see. It does seem like I have some personal stake at all this, but the truth is, I just like to argue. And I've spent too much time on it, so - I can only wish everyone good luck with their choices. Let's hope for the best - whatever that best is for each of us.