This makes no sense. People with large music/movie collections don't want to constantly delete and re-download things, nor is there any benefit whatsoever to you or Apple in doing so. All it does is waste your and Apple's bandwidth.
And for things other than iTunes purchases, deleting it from your device will usually mean deleting it from the cloud as well, since the cloud is just there to mirror your devices.
Nope, I think 64GB is a reasonable request, regardless if you have iCloud or not. iCloud isn't a "digital locker," and it doesn't stream (yet!). It simply keeps everything synced. So if you downloaded an App on iTunes you better have enough storage on your iPhone/iPad because it downloads on iDevices the second you download on iTunes.![]()
+1They both are storage areas that can store documents, projects, musics, movies....
You do realize that iPhone is a phone with less real estate than ipod touch/ipad to put flash chips inside.
Apple knows there is an untapped money market with iCloud for users like you who always needs more space. Paying annually for iCloud will increase Apple's profits rather than just getting a 64GB one. Plus 98% if the people out there have no need for sizes larger than 32GB.
1-Low market demand
2-Arduous task of putting in another 32GB flash chip
3-iCloud money potential
3 reasons why Apple will NOT release a 64 GB iPhone.
On a side note, when I saw the mockup of the iPhone 5 that looks a little bit larger, part of me thought this might be to fit in the same amount of flash storage that Apple does in the iPod touch and iPad. Therefore a 64GB iPhone would be much simpler and probably cheaper. I don't know if flash is compact enough to go to a 128GB iPhone, but I know for sure I'd love to have me one of those.
Really...It's not just about throwing a 64GB drive in there, iPod Touches take 2 32GB chips to get the 64GB version, the iPhone doesn't have that space, and 64GB drives were too cost prohibitive to put in the earlier versions. Sure, they can financially produce anything they want, but they can't produce a version of one of their flagship devices that no one can afford; once the price drops on the chips there will be a higher capacity version. I also have never understood this "you don't need that much storage" mentality, if people were truly happy with continually switching out their media we never would have moved past 6GB computers and 5GB mp3 players.
That would be sad I feel like a need a 64gb. especially with all the games.
In iCloud, all of your purchases are stored there and you can upload up to 50gb of other stuff. So deleting something off of your device does not delete it off iCloud. And my point was Apple wants people using and paying for iCloud storage, and less people would probably pay $100 a year for 50gb if their phone holds more than that.
And I'll admit, I was generalizing, some people may need more than 32gb, but the vast majority of iPhone users don't.
+1
Especially the low market demand. The MacRumors posters who are asking for 64 GB is not a big market for them. Apple goes where the money is at.
I see them maybe updating to 64 GB just once. Maybe to match the offering of the Nokia N9. But after that, the new business model will revolve around cloud service. A 64 GB iPhone if it ever happens could be the highest Apple will ever go. No 128 GB or beyond after that.
It is completely impossible to cater to everyone's needs. You would need a terabyte of storage just to please some people here. HD conversions are huge files. Games put in higher-res also won't help. More convenient if they were just stored in the cloud than trying to cater the very few OCD/packrats who needs over 1TB of storage because not having a couple episodes of their fav shows or not having a couple hundred songs on their phone is going to make a huge difference with their lives.
64 GB could be the last of its kind. And it wouldn't surprise me if they didn't update it after 32 either. The next big emphasis is getting more people to buy into iCloud.
Being a 32 gig iPhone user, I have to say that I have no need for any more storage. I dont see why anyone would really need a 64 gig iPhone. If you have more than 32 gigs of music/ videos, just sync less of that content onto your phone, very few people really need to have more than 32 gigs of content with them all the time, for most people it just isn't nessisary.
My iPad on the other hand...
So, I guess there's no reason for any of the iPods Classics that were greater than 32 GB to ever exist.![]()
![]()
![]()
Tony
A person who only uses 4 GB's on their iPhone could say 16 GB's is "plain overkill". It doesn't make it true.
I still have 1GB left in my 8GB iPhone 3G, and i'm computing comfortably. The only thing i dislike is the overall slowness of iOS 3.1.3, but that'll soon be fixed when i buy the new iPhone 5!
16GBs is more than enough for me, i usually sync and keep whatever i need every night.
+1
Especially the low market demand. The MacRumors posters who are asking for 64 GB is not a big market for them. Apple goes where the money is at.
I see them maybe updating to 64 GB just once. Maybe to match the offering of the Nokia N9. But after that, the new business model will revolve around cloud service. A 64 GB iPhone if it ever happens could be the highest Apple will ever go. No 128 GB or beyond after that.
It is completely impossible to cater to everyone's needs. You would need a terabyte of storage just to please some people here. HD conversions are huge files. Games put in higher-res also won't help. More convenient if they were just stored in the cloud than trying to cater the very few OCD/packrats who needs over 1TB of storage because not having a couple episodes of their fav shows or not having a couple hundred songs on their phone is going to make a huge difference with their lives.
64 GB could be the last of its kind. And it wouldn't surprise me if they didn't update it after 32 either. The next big emphasis is getting more people to buy into iCloud.
So, I guess there's no reason for any of the iPods Classics that were greater than 32 GB to ever exist.![]()
![]()
![]()
Tony
You are right, It will take be at least a couple of years to even reach 20GB of music let alone 32.
Exactly!...We all have different needs!
To one person, a 4GB iPhone is plenty! To another, they could have a 64GB and still be full!
I have a 32GB iPhone with 28GB of stuff on it. Memory is always tight, I can't even film too much video or I risk filling it up.
That's why Apple offers different memory sizes. I mean, isn't this obvious? Or are all of you "16GB is enough for anyone har har" people just trolling?
I wonder if this is how Apple makes decisions.
Guy 1: I think we should put 64 GB's in the next iPhone
Guy 2: Nah dude, three people on MacRumors said they only use 16 GB's. It's completely not needed.
Guy 3: Another guy is saying 640k is enough for anybody. I think we should only sell a 640k iPhone.
Exactly!
I travel a lot. Having things on my iPhone makes that a lot easier.
I don't insist that you follow MY particular approach to memory management. Please don't insist that I follow yours.
Multiple memory amounts with an associated cost is something I am willing to accept. I just hope Apple hears that there IS a need and is able to accommodate that need in the next release.