I for one do not have a problem with tapping a weather icon in order to see the weather, or my e-mail icon in order to read my e-mail. I don't need all that stuff thrown in my face when I look at my home screen.
Attaining my full potential doesn't involve using my smartphone or tablet as a tool to create something, rather it involves me using my smartphone/tablet to manage information, so for me the top level of hierarchy would be information management and not any specific app. But I suppose you could rationalize anything with such an ambiguous theory, ie: Maslow's "Hierarch of Needs" explains the differences between dinosaurs and cavemen for example.
I promise if iOS had widgets and android did not, you would think the exact opposite.
I dislike that Android home screen. When i look at it there is no focal point and its too random.
I'd be disappointed if iOS turned out like that to be honest.
Could you answer my question about how you use your iOS device? How often do you stare at the home screen needing multiple bits of information at hand? EDIT: I am kind of lol that this is 'the next level'. I want things as streamlined as possible - the better the device is, the less I use it (or the more I get done). Increasing simplification while retaining utility is 'the next level'.
so for me the top level of hierarchy would be information management and not any specific app.
All I'm saying is that it would be great to have a CHOICE without jail breaking.
Well, you do have a choice. It's called Android.
Not every operating systems does (or should) act the same. iOS will work great for some. Android will work for others. It's up to the consumer to decide which system works for them. For me its iOS.
The fact that so many people keep coming here and asking "why can't iOS be more like android" while not jumping over to android seems to imply that android isn't all that it's cracked up to be.![]()
I think you misunderstand - you want customization only because it lets you get things done (I presume), and you are focused on personal outcome (creation), not on the means. Unless you want to manage information for its own sake, which you do not.
Both of those screen shots look awful to me, but hey, if that looks good to you I can understand why you want the ability to tweak.
But Apple doesn't view the icon screen as the place to spend time. It's like complaining about the Finder look as it displays folders. That's cute, but it's not where you do your work.
Android users, if I can overgeneralize for a moment about the Android users who choose Android simply because it is Android, seem to be largely made up of tweakers. Hackers. That's cool. I like hackers. I always have. I know the way they think. I have a bit of it in me too.
So yeah, if you want to customize your tablet, or your computer's case, or your car, or your code, or your room, or anything else, you're a tweaker. You look at the UI itself and want to make it your own.
Most people are not like that, so you're going to have a hard time convincing them to be like you. They want things that just work, and if you tell them you can tweak the home screen, they're going to say, "Why would I care? I want to run a program, not stare at the home screen. iOS gets out of my way. Android is in my face."
Sometimes i sit there and use my different apps,
other times, i have the iPad right next to me while i work. I listen to music from it and have my email open... it would be great to control the basic's of the ipad off 1 screen. Is that really difficult to envision?
I beg to differ.
Please forgive me if I'm mistaken, but my understanding is that you are a physician. And as such, surely your "top level of hierarchy" ought to be obtaining the best possible outcomes for your patients? Total cure and/or recovery from injury. Minimization of pain and suffering. etc.
"Information management" is, unless one's job is Director of MIS for the Hospital, surely a secondary concern? Which is not to say that "Information Management" might not be important. If you are currently spending hours and hours digging around in complicated and obscure medical references, or spending hours on the phone trying to track down medical records - then - indeed - "Information Management" might be an area to focus upon.
But, at the end of the day (to use a tired and overworked cliche) - I would certainly hope that - for a physician - the "top level" of hierarchical needs ought to be the healing of one's patients. For an artist the creation of the most beautiful and inspiring works. For a manager the most profitable and productive business results. How one achieves those results is, ultimately, of lesser importance.
Both of those screen shots look awful to me, but hey, if that looks good to you I can understand why you want the ability to tweak.
But Apple doesn't view the icon screen as the place to spend time. It's like complaining about the Finder look as it displays folders. That's cute, but it's not where you do your work.
Android users, if I can overgeneralize for a moment about the Android users who choose Android simply because it is Android, seem to be largely made up of tweakers. Hackers. That's cool. I like hackers. I always have. I know the way they think. I have a bit of it in me too.
So yeah, if you want to customize your tablet, or your computer's case, or your car, or your code, or your room, or anything else, you're a tweaker. You look at the UI itself and want to make it your own.
Most people are not like that, so you're going to have a hard time convincing them to be like you. They want things that just work, and if you tell them you can tweak the home screen, they're going to say, "Why would I care? I want to run a program, not stare at the home screen. iOS gets out of my way. Android is in my face."
There IS a choice. You can choose Android and I can choose iOS.
Everyone's happy.
But no, that's not good enough for you. You want Apple to change to be more like Google. Then you get what you want everywhere and I don't get the thing I want anywhere. So please don't throw the word "CHOICE" around like you're in favor of it. We have a choice right now and your thread is asking for it to be taken away.
No thanks. I'm in favor of actual choice which means I like Apple to be like Apple and Google to be like Google and not have one emulate the other.
And is it really that much of a ****ing faux pas here, to ask for some evolution to something that's been around for years now?
i see that you're written something, but you're not actually saying anything.
How is asking for customizable options on the home screen the opposite of choice?
I'm not asking Apple to change it's iOS code to be exactly like Google.
I'm saying that the iPad screen is big, it could be utilized a way better.
And is it really that much of a ****ing faux pas here, to ask for some evolution to something that's been around for years now?
Be careful what you generalize. You don't like the "grandma" generalization of iOS users, by the same token you can't (unless you have some specific demographical study in hand) generalize who Android users are. I think users are MUCH more overlapping across the two OS' than that.
That poster said something very reasonable, calm down.
*sigh*
Even when I put a disclaimer in my comment about overgeneralizing, I get called out for overgeneralizing.
And to the comment about wouldn't I like my home screen to have all that functionalilty: No. That's not how I use my iPad.
It's really going to be hard for many of us to accept the post-PC era. This will be the era where the computer disappears. If you are trying to tweak your home screen to have all that computer functionality, you are exhibiiting PC thinking. Good for you. Most people don't think that way.
You make the mistake of postulating that Android users are first and foremost concerned about customizing their device and less about using apps to create.
The hypothesis (such as it is) was prompted by the OP: That, regardless of the fact that optimized iPad Apps outnumber tablet-specific Android Applications by a factor of a hundred to one, the inability to customize the homescreen was an important reason for this individual to switch to Android.
It's better to have the option but not use it than to not have the option at all.
I've seen that (or variations on it) posted a lot, but don't really understand the logic behind it. Why is it better to have an option that you're not going to use than not have that option? Either way you're not using it so it doesn't make any difference at all!
But you are generalizing again. It's easy to attempt to predict the future, this PC-less world where everyone will be carrying only tablets Star Trek style. It's easy to generalize and say just because some of us want choice and customability that we are looking to get a desktop like experience on our smartphones/tablets, it's easy to generalize that we are exhibiting "PC thinking", although I can only guess what that means. Do you really think "most people don't think that way"? Or is that just another generalization? I am tending to agree with you that most people don't exhibit this ambiguous "PC thinking", they would just rather have the choice. For example, I'd love to have lockscreen information, that has no "PC thinking" associated with it, but hey don't let that stop you from lumping me in with the rest of the "PC thinkers" if they do exist.