Price transparency will always be best if the companies were to offer it - an option with (or without) ads would be best in this situation so that people can make an informed decisionit has no purpose other than to improve their profit margins.
Any subsidy on the cost of the fridge will be a temporary PR move. En-crud-ification is inevitable.
That being said, refrigerator/appliance sales operate in a very hyper-competitive marketplace whereby any particular option (in this case - advertising) will cease to exist in a relatively short period of time if the demand for that feature is nonexistent
Most businesses operate in very competitive industries, some don’t - the competitiveness of any industry is solely influenced by the ‘barrier to entry’ for new companies looking to get into that particular marketplace
If there is enough ‘excess profits’ in any particular marketplace, it is safe to assume that new entrants will be economically incentivized to enter that particular market relatively quickly thereby fostering increased innovation & lower prices
One exclusion to this economic theory is the ‘barrier to entry’ that is not influenced by market conditions is regulation (think taxis) an example being NYC yellow cabs which had an artificial limit imposed on the total number of cabs - because this ‘limit’ was not determined by the free market, it was well below the equilibrium amount for the number of taxis needed in order to meet demand, this resulting in a supply/demand imbalance in the market, enabling excess profits and poor service
This barrier to entry was eventually overcome with future available technology (being smartphones) resulting in the rise of Uber/Lyft (founded in 2009) only 2 years after the iPhone
It does not take very long for entrepreneurs to discover available opportunities (such as Uber) the 2 barriers to entry here were regulation (on the supply) as well as the technology not being available (in the decades preceding smartphones, when NYC cabs reigned)
In any hyper-competitive marketplace (such as appliances) there will be an industry-wide ‘margin’ just above the wholesale cost to produce the product and any companies operating outside of that range of pricing (wholesale cost + margin) will need to justify that difference to consumers via means of either perceived brand recognition or exclusivity in the feature set offered (that differentiate that particular model from the others)
If they fail to do this, the market (itself) will function as intended and render that product obsolete (via limited demand) eventually removing it from the market or forcing the company to lower the price (to meet consumer demand)
Advertising (via means of technology) has proven to be one way that companies can better compete on price - Uber now makes $1 billion/year in advertising revenue. If companies can derive additional revenue from new sources, they can better compete on pricing. When companies can better compete on pricing, they allow themselves a differentiating factor in the marketplace - allowing their product to stand out and potentially increase their market share & revenue
The longer ANY company takes to make needed changes (in pricing) the longer that industry’s market share (and revenue) will flow to the other companies in that market (think BlackBerry/iPhone)
The less revenue any company receives over that timeframe will have a dramatic compounding effect on the future R&D budget that the company can expend on R&D investment (to allow themselves to better compete) as well as reduced shareholder returns - reduced returns to shareholders will lead to lower future investment (from those shareholders)
Companies can only remain competitive long term with continued and sustained capital. That capital is derived from both companywide profits (as well as future shareholder investment) both of which serve the function of allowing for continued investment in R&D - of which is needed to complete long-term in ANY marketplace