Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Most of the other products were designed to be disposable.
Kind of goes against how "Green" Apple wants the world to think it is.
Green is really on the consumer. If you’re environmentally conscious, take that old laptop back to Apple, they’ll deal with it properly. They MAY even give you some money for it! AND, they’ll repurpose it properly (refurbished or recycled). Folks that don’t want to recycle won’t recycle no matter how replaceable the parts are.

I think there’s a big part of this is the people that understand that, in the future, there’s likely to be far fewer cheap or free easily “repairable” machines to be found. And, if you DO find one, it’ll be something seriously wrong such that it’s not even worth putting in the effort to make it work again. And, still, if a person’s drive for having things repairable is to ensure something doesn’t needlessly end up in the dump, that person will just take that laptop to Apple where they will deal with it, free of charge! And it won’t end up in the dump!
the year Apple listened to customers
Most of Apple’s customers are using some variant of iOS, so Apple’s always listening to their customers. Most of Apple customers are also using mobile macOS or iMacs, too.

You could say that Apple listened to a tiny little sliver of customers and provided that small demand with a suitably priced solution...
Mac mini with a PCIe slot is no longer mini.
Thanks for this note, I hadn’t thought about that. Once you include a PCIe slot, folks will expect to put whatever they want into it. They wouldn’t have an option of saying, “It’s PCIe, but, you know, don’t put anything REALLY powerful in it.”
Apple doesn't provide ten years of OS support for a Mac.
There really doesn’t have to be ten years of OS support. I’m sure we all know folks that stopped upgrading at some earlier version of OSX because the software they need wouldn’t run on anything newer OR would be flaky. And, as long as they’re making money, where’s the drive to upgrade? Just keep if off the open net.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickUrPoison
What sort of machine are you thinking of there? Do you have a link so I can see a similarly specced Windows machine? I assumed they would cost a lot *less* than the Mac but I don’t know where to look.

Sure, because, for starters, it would take generic storage that is very competatively priced, and generic graphics cards that can be plugged into a generic PSU with GPU power wires... Here's what most people do in the not-Apple universe: buy lowest spec, then buy aftermarket, and upgrade as need arises or tech improves! :sigh:
 
No one is suggesting the xMac would need a Xeon processor and ECC RAM. Stick an i7 in there (in addition to fewer RAM / PCIe slots, obviously) and even $1,999 becomes achievable.
Who is it for? Who needs (not wants) it? Apple is not building PC‘s for hobbyists or for people who don’t want to pay for their upgrade pricing.
 
Really wish someday they would drop the price down to may be $2999 starting point.
 
There is a reason you can't swap out the SSD in any Mac with a T2 chip. Apple redesigned and intergrated the SSD controller into the T2 chip - so the SSD's Apple uses are without the embedded SSD Controller. That said, I hope that SOMEONE eventually comes out with a lower cost Apple compatible SSD; but there is a reason why you can't swap the SSD's out, and that reason is security.

Funny how "security" is achieved equally well, if not even better, with OPAL without the T2 in the not-Apple universe 🤣
 
...a hackintosh is repairability utopia.

It is a maintainability nightmare and a legal hazard. Professionals will gladly pay to avoid that.

Complaints about a lack of a mid tier tower will continue as long as there is demand and Apple refuses to meet that demand.
 
What sort of machine are you thinking of there? Do you have a link so I can see a similarly specced Windows machine? I assumed they would cost a lot *less* than the Mac but I don’t know where to look.

If you look at Workstation from Dell and HP, the Mac Pro is actually competitively priced if not actually cheaper on higher end config.

I still haven't figure out why coming in 2020 Workstation price still has such a wide gap. It used to make more sense in pre 2010s. Now it feels to me as price gouging.

If you are simply asking for a self build machines, then yes, you could probably pick one with similar quality casing and hardware for less than 3K.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Xirian
Build a hackintosh. Use an intel 9900k and an AMD card. There are plenty of build guides online. If the new Mac pro is a “masterclass” in repairability, then a hackintosh is repairability utopia.

I really don't want to mess around with a hackintosh, and the problems it brings. I have been using Macs since the G4 PB so certainly don't have a problem paying some premium for the MacOS experience. The problem with new MP is that it's already year+ old technology at a time when AMD is pushing boundaries with Ryzen and Nvidia with graphics in both raw performance and $/performance areas.

With that said, I have priced out a Ryzen box for Linux. As a programmer, the new MP is definitely not for me. Since I'm not an A/V professional, Apple doesn't consider me a good customer I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 09872738
Imagine, a Mac Pro Book, a big ol' fatty laptop where you could swap in parts.

It wouldn't have to be that fat either.

The Dell XPS 15 has swappable RAM and SSD... and it's only 4.4 lbs and a similar thickness.

960x0.jpg
 
Why do I wonder if this is the entire point of the "right to repair?" Design by chaos, only for the techs. Attractive for the software engineer. Not so much for the rest of us.
 
So the machine gets a 9/10 from its fiercest critic, calling it a masterclass in repairability, and YOU decide to harp on this? Really?

Well, because an SSD -- also known as "hard disk" back in the old days -- is among the first things you usually want to replace or upgrade; the others would be RAM, then the graphics card(s), then at some point the processor(s).

So, yeah, not being able to replace the SSD because of some stupid chip that nobody ever asked for is a reason "to harp on this".
 
SSD/T2 doesn't make sense in my eyes. There is no TouchID or FaceID as far as I can see. Having something like 4xM2 slots would be a awesome.
Especially in a working environment where a broken SSD shouldn't cause any problems. Call Apple? Is the correct SSD model from Apple available? No - your computer is too old, buy a new one and you can trade in your old MacPro for $300!!

You do realize you can put any kind of storage you want into this machine, without Apple's help? SSD or rotating media with various interfaces. Anything. Provide your own controller in one of the slots and go for it. You can also attach high speed external storage with the T3 bus (possibly internal as well). Basically, you've got huge bandwidth for storage and nothing stands in your way.

The only thing you can't do is swap the original SSD cards in the original SSD connectors, or add non-Apple SSD cards to that same tray. They depend on a controller in the T2 chip.

But other than that, the Mac Pro is amazingly upgradable when it comes to storage.

Methinks people are forgetting that this is an expandable system.
 
The Mac Pro 5,1 is the last Mac Apple built for enthusiasts (and professionals alike).

This new Mac Pro is the only "Pro"-named device that Apple makes that actually lives up to the name.

This machine is for people making money off of it to justify its high cost.

For everyone else, Apple offers the Mini. Thunderbolt 3 allows for the modularity that decently fills the gap between the consumer and new Pro Mac paradigms, even if it won't be as neat as a single box.

The combination of the Trash Can and then this Mac Pro is Apple's response to this; they will NOT waste their time with the enthusiast market.
 
That's a lousy reason to not be able to swap the SSD.

"Security" would mean that the SSD wouldn't be readable in any other computer because they don't have the encryption key that's in the T2 chip. This is perfectly okay.

However, it should be possible to install a new SSD and tell the system to format it and use it just as the one you took out, with the same or even a different encryption key. The fact that you can't "format" a new SSD is a huge flaw in my opinion. You shouldn't need Apple's help to swap storage.

Apple's T2 chip contains the SSD controller, along with other system controllers used in the MacPro. Even if on-the-fly encryption were not performed, one would need a commercial SSD that does not employ a built-in controller of its own.

One of the side benefits of Apple's approach is incredibly fast SSD performance at 3.4 GB/sec sequential read and write rates.
 
What exactly is "bad" in Win10, the Linux subsystem, free type-1 hypervisor, sandboxing, application guard? Or is it simply that it's not from Apple?

What's about about Windows 10 is the "simple" fact that it technically is SPYWARE. Nobody knows what all that telemetry data is that it collects and sends to Microsoft - with absolutely no way to completely disable that behavior; it can only be reduced a bit, but not entirely switched off - not even in the expensive enterprise editions.

If you are unlucky and don't have access to an enterprise edition of Windows 10, you'll even constantly get applications installed that you don't want and never had asked for and that you have even uninstalled before: Candy Crush Soda Saga (or whatever that annoying piece of junk is called these days) anyone?

Not being able to fully control the insane of amounts of huge updates and upgrades is another thing that actually is BAD, especially if you don't have an ultra-fast fiber optics connection at home. What's also bad is that you spend more time updating and rebooting Windows 10 than you spend USING it because of that.

The same is true for the Xbox One, by the way, since that thing also uses a Windows 10 kernel with the same ridiculous update insanity -- and the Xbox One cannot even download OS updates in the background.

That being said: macOS is also way past its glorious days; it feels like a perpetual beta version where things are constantly broken or not really working as they should. On the performance, feature, comfort and usability level, Windows 10 -- and even Ubuntu 18.04 LTS! -- beat the crap out of macOS that in comparison just feels old, "clunky", unloved and unpolished.

But, as we all know, none of that matters anymore, because neither Microsoft nor Apple really care about the desktop anymore. Microsoft wants you to use their services in their own Azure cloud, and Apple just wants you to buy iOS gadgets. For both companies, the desktop has died quite a while ago.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ohio.emt
I really think iFixit need to revaluate how they view repairability. Docking a point because of a critical security feature seems harsh, especially in light of their criticism of iCloud activation locks.

I agree Apple, and the rest of the industry, have a lot of improving to do, but some features of our tech needs to be intentionally locked down for the safety of our data/stuff.

they could just use m.2 SSDs and provide a tool that allows users to pair them with the T2 Chip.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.