As long as Apple keeps actively developing iWork and iLife this is a good thing. iWork sure has some ground to regain.
Can someone explain to me what the last paragraph is about? I read the same thing in the financial results conference today. It mentions deferred revenue of $900 million, but what does this mean?
Overall, a Mac is cheaper than a Windows machine. If you own a Windows machine for 4 to 5 years then you are likely to upgrade Windows 2 to 3 times. Those upgrade can run $100 each. On top of that, Microsoft is going to ding you for Office 365 at $100 per year. On top of that, you get more in the way of technical support from Apple especially in-person help with Genius Bar appointments at their stores being free. Then you have to think at how much time you will save if you go all-in on the Apple ecosystem with things just working together.
I'm not saying that Microsoft is offering a bad price for their services and software, just that the "expensive" part of Apple is up-front. The "expensive" part of Microsoft is the nickel and dime costs that occur later.
Apple and Microsoft are the only two vendors offering the complete package right now from living room to your desktop to your tablet to your mobile phone (assuming you count third-party PC's with Windows on them which are not really Microsoft). Google's Chrome OS has yet to prove it can fill that gap. Google has a TV solution similar to Apple's while XBOX One is arguably a better solution than either Apple's or Google's TV solution.
iLife '09.
Microsoft has already stated that they are moving to a yearly model. And by all accounts, every other year will be a paid upgrade. Or at least that's what the plan appeared to be until Mavericks came out....now, I think all bets are off.3 updates in 5 years?
So you buy your computers about a year before the OS refresh, right? Oh, and this isn't really apples to apples, because you can be two versions behind and you'll still get patch tuesday every month. Microsoft supports their OS with 5 years mainstream and 5 more years security fixes. A person generally needs to be within a version number to reliably get updates.
10.7.5 came out a year ago, for example.
Look, I will be one of the firsts to say that a MBA is worth every penny, but let's not lie about why it is.
I am an accountant so let me try and explain.
This is an accounting rule that states that if your price covers more than one product, such as hardware and software, then you have to bifurcate and allocate the revenue generated between the products.
But there is another rule whereby you need to recognize revenue as either current revenue or future revenue. This is determined by when you earn that revenue by delivering the good that is apart of the price paid.
So in this case, Apple would get the cash for the product sold immediately, but could only recognize part of it for the current hardware and software. They need to then estimate the value of their expected future updates and "defer" that revenue until they perform the work to earn it and thus recognize it.
Basically, they are holding a liability that is an Unearned Revenue account that gets relieved into Revenue as they perform to earn that revenue, the principle for this is because there will be expenses incurred to earn that revenue which they must match with the deferred revenue to recognize it.
This is not really an obscure accounting rule at all to a profressional accountant. I was really quite shocked when I saw Apple had to charge for past updates, I actually used it as an example in my accounting seminar courses at school.
A good example of this principle is magazine subscriptions. The magazine gets the money all upfront for the year, but it is considered a liability called Unearned Revenue, and gets turned into Revenue as they deliver magazines. This is intuitive because the company has an obligation to deliver those magazines once they collect the subscription or they would owe the cash back and is the reason they cannot recognize it immediately.
Sorry for the long explanation, but it felt good to finally get to contribute something from my profession!![]()
I really do not like the 'Free' model ... if 'Free' means an inferior product.
I would gladly pay $40, $50, $75, or $100 for an iWork that was more than just a glorified iOS version.
I am afraid that Apple is going to kill off or run off 'pro' users of their software.
Aperture is free too... if you know how. (Hint find a trial download, then look in the App Store)
Microsoft has already stated that they are moving to a yearly model. And by all accounts, every other year will be a paid upgrade. Or at least that's what the plan appeared to be until Mavericks came out....now, I think all bets are off.
If you own a Windows machine for 4 to 5 years then you are likely to upgrade Windows 2 to 3 times.
Wish it was really free. Owners of iLife apps before '11 are still being charged for upgrades, a week after this was supposed to have been fixed.
Aperture is free too... if you know how. (Hint find a trial download, then look in the App Store)
So it's free if you "upgrade" to the current version but not free if you just buy it outright as a new user? That's daft. Why not just make it free for everyone.
apple is so generous. but if you buy an expensive computer i guess its the least they could do
I won't even use a free program from Apple if they continue to dumb down their software and take away pro features that originally made their software great.
Overall, a Mac is cheaper than a Windows machine. If you own a Windows machine for 4 to 5 years then you are likely to upgrade Windows 2 to 3 times. Those upgrade can run $100 each. On top of that, Microsoft is going to ding you for Office 365 at $100 per year. On top of that, you get more in the way of technical support from Apple especially in-person help with Genius Bar appointments at their stores being free. Then you have to think at how much time you will save if you go all-in on the Apple ecosystem with things just working together.
I'm not saying that Microsoft is offering a bad price for their services and software, just that the "expensive" part of Apple is up-front. The "expensive" part of Microsoft is the nickel and dime costs that occur later.
Apple and Microsoft are the only two vendors offering the complete package right now from living room to your desktop to your tablet to your mobile phone (assuming you count third-party PC's with Windows on them which are not really Microsoft). Google's Chrome OS has yet to prove it can fill that gap. Google has a TV solution similar to Apple's while XBOX One is arguably a better solution than either Apple's or Google's TV solution.
Maybe instead of 10.9 -> 11, they will adopt the absolutely stupid practice of versioning like 10.10. If they do that I'm just going to call it OS Double X, or Dos Equis. That will tie in well with the new Aqua: Stay thirsty my friends.
If you're having trouble getting upgrades, the "guest account" fix works very well. It worked for me.
Can someone explain to me what the last paragraph is about? I read the same thing in the financial results conference today. It mentions deferred revenue of $900 million, but what does this mean?
This should be good for the stock price. It basically ensures that everyone pays for Apple's software development.
Coming in 2014: OS XI
Wish it was really free. Owners of iLife apps before '11 are still being charged for upgrades, a week after this was supposed to have been fixed.