But that's not what the post was set out to do. Everyone clearly had the impression that my "racism" would be among the reasons why she should not like me or not want to be with me, so all I sought to do was clarify that we are of one mind on those issues and that it therefore should not be a point that keeps being brought up in the manner that it was.
No.
As usual, you don't get it. And, for the fourth time, - this is extraordinary - you seek to impress on us that your wife shares your views.
Both
@yaxomoxay and
@mobilehaathi, have explained perfectly well that the issue is not that we thought your wife disdained your views, or whether she shares them, but, rather, your racism is indicative of a world view where some people are regarded as being of lesser worth, by virtue of their ethnicity, and that this justifies their being treated as such.
Again, it is extraordinary that your jealousy and lack of generosity means that you are adamant in your insistence in letting us know that Soon-To-Be-Ex-MrsCampbell shares these views, in stark and telling contrast to the lack of warmth with which you have described her, both as a person, as a mother.
What is funny is that your conduct - an your deluded self image - persuades you that you are being 'analytical, logical, detached' when you are really displaying the most immature of pathetic and petty jealousies. (They like her more than they like me, so I'll make them see that she is just as racist as I am).
This is not logic - not in a dispassionate sense.
No, your racism was pointed out to prove once more that you don't have empathy, not that it was the source of any political argument between you two.
I am pretty conservative myself, and I am often called a bigot etc, but you are too extreme even for me...
No, actually, it was brought up to demonstrate your pathological thinking. Whether she agrees with you or not, your reasoning in matters of "race" is very much related to how you chose to treat your ex-wife.
Exactly. And well said, both of you.
Not only are my wife and I both race realists, but we would adamantly deny any connection between the recognition of scientific facts about human racial differences, and any sort of pathologies. You can't call it pseudoscience unless you can disprove it. The simplest thing would be to just leave our social, political, biological views out of the equation, which is all I was trying to accomplish.
Pseudoscience, and deluded thinking, masking corrosive contempt, but masquerading as logic and objectivity.
What would be funny - if the consequences were not so serious - is that you genuinely think that objectivity has led you to where you are, but instead, it is the crudest version of 'confirmation bias', as blinkered, blind and subjectlyq deluded as anything else you have written.
Your warped view of the world (on woman, on races, on social class) drives everything you do, and everything you believe; this is not objective fact, rather, it is prejudice disguised as science.
Incorrect. A debate about whether Bengal and Siberian tigers would maintain their separate scientific categorizations if scientists treated the Tiger species the way they treat the Human species. This could not have less to do with "worthiness" of different people. It's about biology and science, about the reality of genetically distinct sub-species within species of mammals.
This topic is one of my chief interests in life actually. Yes, there's a lot going on in my life, but one can and should remain engaged in their work, hobbies, passions, etc, at the same time.
You have a young daughter. But yes, you did say that you 'don't plan to be very involved' with the child.
But, yes, you have a lot 'going on' in your life.
And, as always, it is you life, your needs, your narcissism, that drive this discourse.
I'm conversing with MrsCampbell at the moment, arranging for me to come down and visit them next week. We're regularly conversing about everything we might want to discuss with a counselor in the near future, talking about all the different possibilities, etc. I spend a large amount of time each day conversing with her as we try to figure everything out.
Somehow, I had always thought a conversation is that which takes place between two people. You know, like those dialogues you had to learn off when rehearsing a school play.
Why do I keep getting the impression that most of this communication takes the form of an endlessly repeated, tenacious, incessant monologue?
Does MrsCampbell have the right to offer an opinion, or say something that you might not welcome, or wish to hear?
