Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
kitkit201 said:
Just how "Silent" is it? Can you even hear the thing if u had no music in your room? Please give us feedback!


It is very silent. If you try very hard you might here a faint noise. Put your ear to the front and you can here a slight HD noise.
 
MacG said:
How matched is matched? Does it have to be from same manufacturer, or is a PC3200 DDR 512 MB stick from Crucial considered matched to the OEM one that will come with my iMac?

We don't know yet. Most people are betting that Apple is delivering RAM of CAS timing CL-3, and that if you match the size and CL-3 then you will have access to dual channel.

Some even surmise that if the CAS timing is different, that the G5 iMac could still do dual channel -- albeit at the slower timing. This one is pure conjecture, and we have to wait for reports from the field...

Most iMac owners will never know or care about single vs. dual channel. It was smart of Apple to enable any combination of sticks in the two slots.
 
KeareB said:
Again, we don't yet know how much the performance boost is, but we do know that there will be some kind of performance boost with a matched pair.


How about this: My 1.8 20" is shipping with 256 ram. I use after effects and Final Cut and so could use every little bit... but I'm low on funds. Here's what I can afford: buy 1 Gb to combine with my 256... or buy 2 512 and lose the 256- I can't afford 2 1 Gb.... If it runs better on matched pairs, any idea on which of these configs would be superior?
I know no one knows for sure, but perhaps an educated guess. :)
 
KeareB said:
G5 iMac (this is an iMac thread) runs in single channel mode if there is one stick or if the pair is mismatched, and dual channel if the pair is matched.

Again, we don't yet know how much the performance boost is, but we do know that there will be some kind of performance boost with a matched pair.

woops that was my bad, you're right.
 
Voiteur said:
How about this: My 1.8 20" is shipping with 256 ram. I use after effects and Final Cut and so could use every little bit... but I'm low on funds. Here's what I can afford: buy 1 Gb to combine with my 256... or buy 2 512 and lose the 256- I can't afford 2 1 Gb.... If it runs better on matched pairs, any idea on which of these configs would be superior?

If you are pushing the iMac to do that, I'd shoot eventually to max out the memory at 2GB. Thus, I'd buy the 1GB, live with the performance hit of single channel memory for the time being, and save your pennies to buy a second 1GB stick.
 
corbin_a2 said:
Here we go: 17" 1.8 512mb
Thank you Corbin for those pictures, and congratulations on the new iMac. Looks great! Can you give us your impression of the computer in general. How do you find the audio performance?
Oh, and may I ask if you use that Apple ][c? :)
 
KeareB said:
We don't know yet. Most people are betting that Apple is delivering RAM of CAS timing CL-3, and that if you match the size and CL-3 then you will have access to dual channel.

Some even surmise that if the CAS timing is different, that the G5 iMac could still do dual channel -- albeit at the slower timing. This one is pure conjecture, and we have to wait for reports from the field...

Most iMac owners will never know or care about single vs. dual channel. It was smart of Apple to enable any combination of sticks in the two slots.

Hopefully it is CL3 then - I just bought an extra stick from crucial and that's what they're selling
 
So is the Power Mac G5 memory the same as the iMac G5? At 1-800-4 Memory they don't have a 512mb iMac memory listed but they do have a Power Mac G5 listed. Same?
 
daveway00 said:
Can you do a review for all we anxious people, maybe a benchmark please?


Faster then my G3 AIO :) Is there a way to do a benchmark? I don't have any software for it.

All and all I am pleased with it so far. I don't think I can do a real review untill I use it more then 1 hr. But everything seems good so far. I like the size and the screen is nice and bright. Put a DVD in and it look excelent! All good so far.
 
KeareB said:
If you are pushing the iMac to do that, I'd shoot eventually to max out the memory at 2GB. Thus, I'd buy the 1GB, live with the performance hit of single channel memory for the time being, and save your pennies to buy a second 1GB stick.

Yes, it's sad... (spent all my money waiting for those dual 3Ghz rev B G5's to be released last december as everyone seemed so sure they would be) but I've had the patience to render 15 minute projects on an 800 emac and even a 400 imac, so this should seem like nothin.

I'm buyin' the 1 GB now.
 
Oh and the Apple II. I love it! Just found it at a junk sale for $5 and it works perfict. Got lots of old games for it. Love the Old vs. New on my desk top.
 

Attachments

  • newold.jpg
    newold.jpg
    37.1 KB · Views: 1,864
corbin_a2 said:
Silent! I love it!

Thank you for posting your pictures, they are awesome. That new iMac looks very impressive, nice setup. Good news to hear that they run quietly.

Finally Apple is delivering a product on target, it should help to impress investors.
 
corbin_a2 said:
Faster then my G3 AIO :) Is there a way to do a benchmark? I don't have any software for it.

All and all I am pleased with it so far. I don't think I can do a real review untill I use it more then 1 hr. But everything seems good so far. I like the size and the screen is nice and bright. Put a DVD in and it look excelent! All good so far.


Go to www.cinebench.com and download the cinebench 2003 software (the G5 version). Run that and post the scores. You can save the scores as a text file, so just post the contents of that file.
 
dbauer said:
Go to www.cinebench.com and download the cinebench 2003 software (the G5 version). Run that and post the scores. You can save the scores as a text file, so just post the contents of that file.


Please . . . and thanks for the pictures!

:)
 
corbin_a2 said:
Oh and the Apple II. I love it! Just found it at a junk sale for $5 and it works perfict. Got lots of old games for it. Love the Old vs. New on my desk top.

That is so sweet! :D

I gotta go find my vintage Apples (a Plus, a classic and an Apple ][) and do something similar with my current setup!


Congratulations and thank you for the pix.
 
KeareB said:
We don't know yet. Most people are betting that Apple is delivering RAM of CAS timing CL-3, and that if you match the size and CL-3 then you will have access to dual channel.

Some even surmise that if the CAS timing is different, that the G5 iMac could still do dual channel -- albeit at the slower timing. This one is pure conjecture, and we have to wait for reports from the field...

Most iMac owners will never know or care about single vs. dual channel. It was smart of Apple to enable any combination of sticks in the two slots.

I'm dealing with this dilemma right now. I ordered a 20inch iMac with a single 512mb chip. I was going to go ahead and order another 512mb separately, but I read in another forum that I should wait and see what the CAS timing is on the chip installed by Apple. How do I figure that out once I get my iMac?
 
CINEBENCH 2003 TEST ON G5 IMAC 17" 1.8/512ram


CPU Benchmark Rendering = 249-CPU

OpenGL Hardware Lighting Test
Scene 1 17.78 sec 5.7 fps
Scene 2 5.32 sec 16.9 fps
1153675 polygons/sec

OpenGL Software Lighting Test
Scene 1 20.69 sec: 4.9 fps
Scene 2 6.62 sec; 13.6 fps
927122 polygons/sec

Cinema 4D Shading Test
Scene 1 43.44 sec; 2.3 fps
Scene 2 20.93 sec; 4.3 fps
293242 polygons/sec

Single CPU Render Test = 105.7 sec
 
corbin_a2 said:
CINEBENCH 2003 TEST ON G5 IMAC 17" 1.8/512ram


CPU Benchmark Rendering = 249-CPU

OpenGL Hardware Lighting Test
Scene 1 17.78 sec 5.7 fps
Scene 2 5.32 sec 16.9 fps
1153675 polygons/sec

OpenGL Software Lighting Test
Scene 1 20.69 sec: 4.9 fps
Scene 2 6.62 sec; 13.6 fps
927122 polygons/sec

Cinema 4D Shading Test
Scene 1 43.44 sec; 2.3 fps
Scene 2 20.93 sec; 4.3 fps
293242 polygons/sec

Single CPU Render Test = 105.7 sec

Anyone know if these are good :confused:
 
corbin_a2 said:
CINEBENCH 2003 TEST ON G5 IMAC 17" 1.8/512ram


CPU Benchmark Rendering = 249-CPU

Single CPU Render Test = 105.7 sec

According to this:

https://www.macrumors.com/pages/2004/07/20040702194153.shtml

the 2.5 Ghz G5 does 356-CPU on the single CPU rendering test.

that is, it scales almost linearly in with CPU- frequency (basically getting 140 per GHz).

It shows that the 600 Mhz FSB speed does not limit the new iMac G5 design :)

PS. Mine is shipping to Norway too!!!!!!! :D :D
 
Congrats

Congrats to everyone who received their iMac G5s today and those who are going to tomorrow. Good luck sleeping. I don't know what the CineBench results mean, but I am sure someone will interpret/attack/defend/re-interpret soon enough. I hope that the results are what everyone was hoping for. I won't be the first person with a new imac but I'll get mine soon enough.

I am curious about how well the speakers work though. Most people expand upon the stock setup anyway but I am curious to see how well it works. Maybe Apple will develop it's own line of innovative peripherals down the line.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.