While others are complaining that Apple updates their computers too fast
others? I would suspect maybe "one" other at most.
While others are complaining that Apple updates their computers too fast
this is why their market share will hit a peak soon. even MS haters that i know still buy PC's because they can't get over the price of a Mac and what you get for that price. especially these days
others? I would suspect maybe "one" other at most.
I hope they finally do away with the internal optical drive.
External options for SuperDrive and Blu-Ray would do. Not that I would buy either.
They could substitute an SDHC reader and put the MacOSX on one card.![]()
No Bluray until 2013
It will most likely get the i3 in the base with a "possible" BTO i5 option. The i5 may put off too much heat to fit in the 21.5" though... maybe we'll see a 24" with i5?
There are two types of i5. The expensive dual-core laptop variant, or the less-expensive quad-core desktop variant. The desktop i5 is the one that puts out too much heat for the 21", although the 27" can house it perfectly well. Apple could use the dual-core, but doing so will increase the iMac's price.Boo they can fit a i5 into a 15inch mbp they can't fit one into a 21inch imac?
Great: one more thing to pile on my desk. Keep the internal optical option (BluRay, please, along with a DVD SP update to accommodate authoring BD-R).
If you don't need an optical drive, or prefer an external solution, like Primera Disc Robots, then no need to buy the internal optical. And without the internal drive, how do you load software in the multi-gigabyte size range (like FCS)?
People that say comments like "load MacOSX on an SD card" or "Remove the optical drive to make the already nicely thin MBPs even thinner," usually don't need to load any software like FCP nor do they need better hardware in the MBPs.
I disagree - VERY much. Many, many professionals/prosumers I deal with (I mainly deal with local web developers and graphic artists, but also regularly deal with big TV/Film production crews) would love to see the removal of optical drives (in conversation, many of them have questioned why the optical drives are still included as they're never really used). They share/transfer work either through networks, pocket USB HDDs, USB sticks or SD cards and have for a long time.
I disagree - VERY much. Many, many professionals/prosumers I deal with (I mainly deal with local web developers and graphic artists, but also regularly deal with big TV/Film production crews) would love to see the removal of optical drives (in conversation, many of them have questioned why the optical drives are still included as they're never really used). They share/transfer work either through networks, pocket USB HDDs, USB sticks or SD cards and have for a long time.
Very true. All in company software installations at my company are done over the network. The CDROM is almost never used except to install the OS, which begs the question why the heck do we even need it...
i kno I cant but Apple can, they just went into my iMac and switched out my 4850 since it fried so if it were to occur again, can i pay the difference and they put in a 5000 series card....would there be a heat problem, or something of the sort
I would only agree with you 30%, you're right, a lot of file transfer and minor data related tasks are done with USB/Flash drives and portable HDDs. But I beg the question, "how high is your production house" if they'd prefer to install the 60GBs+ needed for FCS over a 480Mbps sloppy USB I/O.
That's not to mention the many MANY apps needed in production that exceed the paltry amount of data FCS needs.
On the other hand, MOST if not ALL of the pros in the production industry I work with, that ARE small --> medium sized houses remove the optical drive themselves merely to shove another HDD or SSD into their laptops for field work/scratch. NONE have ever said the optical drive is useless, and none have ever begged to wait 10 hours + to install FCS, Avid, Adobe Master Collection, Maya, Nuke, etc over a USB connection.
Too little too late, my parents just bought one of those stupid touch screen PC's.![]()
why do you consider them stupid? I read somewhere that the new iMacs might have touch screen. just curious.
Couldn't wait any longer, so purchased my 21.5" 413B version last friday. Have to say, I am very impressed, my work load has been halfed in a few days. Cant wait to have a full weekend to use it and really road test.![]()
Because a device you are already holding in your hands like a phone or iPad is great as a touch device. A desktop computer/monitor that you have to reach out and touch is not so great. I really don't want a 27" iMac, for example, within a few inches of my face. And if you place it much further away, it becomes uncomfortable to stretch out and touch the screen.
Plus, you would get fingerprints all over that lovely 27" screen.![]()
What are you talking about?!? USB 2.0 is way faster than any DVD drive.
It's much faster to install software from an external USB HD than from an internal optical drive.
Where I work all software is installed from images on the central file server. When we need to wipe a computer we net boot from an installer image on the server and install the entire OS over Ethernet. I haven't done it recently, but I recall it took less time than installing from DVD.
![]()
AppleInsider reports that Apple has begun advising third-party retail partners of impending shortages of the company's iMac models, suggesting that a refresh of the company's popular all-in-one desktop line may be in store for the near future.Just last week, Hardmac reported that the Mac Pro would see an "end of summer" update, with iMac updates not following until several weeks after that. The site also claimed that the iMac may gain USB 3.0 and faster FireWire connectivity as part of the refresh.
The iMac was last updated in October, when it saw a major redesign to shift to 21.5-inch and 27-inch LED displays.
Article Link: iMac Shipments Running Low Ahead of Refresh?
Here is my prediciton:
21" High End
Core i5 Clarksdale (2-cores), not sure what speed
ATI 5600's
4 gigs of RAM
1.5 TB hard drive
There are two types of i5. The expensive dual-core laptop variant, or the less-expensive quad-core desktop variant. The desktop i5 is the one that puts out too much heat for the 21", although the 27" can house it perfectly well. Apple could use the dual-core, but doing so will increase the iMac's price.
I have 2 Macs & can't see myself ever not owning Macs. However, I think your points are valid.this is why their market share will hit a peak soon. even MS haters that i know still buy PC's because they can't get over the price of a Mac and what you get for that price. especially these days
even the whole virus thing is overblown. i work near our help desk and the tiny percentage of the usual suspects create most of their work