Alright boys - get your hardware engineers together - and crank out those hyper fast gpu designs - all 3 of you (aapl/nvda/intc) are only located within a few miles of each other - have your teams go out for drinks after work and talk over the new designs - asap
"The cross-licensing agreement allows Intel to integrate NVIDIA technologies and those that are covered by our patents into their CPUs, such as Sandy Bridge, for example," said Jen-Hsuan. "And a cross-license allows us to build processors and take advantage of Intel patents for the types of processor we're building--Project Denver, Tegra, and the types of processors we're going to build in the future."
Yay! Now integrated GPUs will also fail as often as discreet ones!
Macrumors keeps crobarring this in to every posting about this subject. It's always stated as a fact, or as an assumption, and it just makes it sound as if they're just making fanboy excuses so that Apple won't look so bad for still using core2 duos and charging premium price. (I mean if you're going to use Core 2 duos, at least lower the price.)
This is fantastic news. I can't wait for Ivy Bridge processors with Nvidia's integrated graphics cards embedded into the chips.
Yay! Now integrated GPUs will also fail as often as discreet ones!
There ya go, Intel IGP's will now be just as good in the Medium Graphics mode as well as the Low one...
![]()
I suppose the big question is whether this can be sorted for the next MacBook and 13" MBP update or whether they will take a bit longer than usual?
Read the article correctly. The headline is wrong.
Yay! Now integrated GPUs will also fail as often as discreet ones!
...AMD integrated chipset functions in the CPU (memory controller, and so on). Chipset makers had a difficult time, because they were no longer able to sell their chipsets for AMD-based systems (similar to NVIDIA now). The same happens on Intels side (see Nehalem/Westmere and Sandy Bridge). So AMDs/Intels stories are very similar, if viewed from today. To continue this red line, Intel needed some really good IPs in the field in which NVIDIA works. So now we have AMD & ATI vs. Intel & NVIDIA. That seems to be a very natural and logical progress.
However, both manufacturers need to increase the tightness of the integrated circuits. Intel plans a 22 nm process, which should appear in Ivy Bridge in 2012. I do not see high performance IGPs until the integration potential develops further (a shrinkage to 22 nm, for example). Even SB is far too hot (the TDP is too high) for mobile solutions, if you use all processor and GPU cores. Apple will use therefore only the lower end SB mobile processors.
Exactly, this is a MR editor getting exited and playing Jump The Shark. I do wonder if we'll see native CUDA execution on Intel GPUs though in the future, nor do I doubt that the announced DX11 support in Ivy Bridge is partially based on NVIDIA tech....
According to the updates to the Ars article, Sandy Bridge already uses nVidia patents in the CPU/GPU technology. So what needed sorting out just did, Intel paid nVidia for the right to use it.
But seeing how the Sandy Bridge IGP is still sub-par compared to the offerings from nVidia/ATI, it seems it's going to take more than a few nVidia patents to bring Intel up to speed with their GPU offerings.
So while the headline would be awesome if it were true, we're still very far from it.
haha seriously, only the defective ones are in apple computers (probably because of apples garbage thermal design).
ive never had a nvidia card fail on me EVER, even running their whole life over clocked to their limit.
haha seriously, only the defective ones are in apple computers (probably because of apples garbage thermal design).
ive never had a nvidia card fail on me EVER, even running their whole life over clocked to their limit.
Shouldn't it still have been under warranty?my 8800GTX (evga) died on me two years after purchase, running under factory specs and only about 4 hours a day. am not ready call it quits with nvidia just yet, but have definitely moved on from evga because of their poor customer support.
Change the headline.
The settlement was so Intel could continue to use technologies in Sandy Bridge which had been infringing on nVidia's patents.
There is nothing new in this agreement
for Intel except to allow them to do what they have already been doing.
which ones?
Change the headline.
The settlement was so Intel could continue to use technologies in Sandy Bridge which had been infringing on nVidia's patents.
There is nothing new in this agreement for Intel except to allow them to do what they have already been doing.