Apple has used multiple different chips and architectures over the decades. Intel was a big part of Apple's resurgence. As always with processors, there are peaks and valleys for everyone. Remember when AMD was dead? Intel will be just fine if you remember that Apple is about 8% of the computer market.Apple has moved on. Just like when you break up with your ex. There is no turning back.
Did I say anything about YOUR soft skills? I don’t even know who you are or even if you’re an engineer.I’m an actual engineer. You have no knowledge of my soft skills.
But your statement was about all engineers. Not engineers that you know.Did I say anything about YOUR soft skills? I don’t even know who you are or even if you’re an engineer.I said MY experience with engineers. Yours very likely may vary.
I suspect if Apple ever makes a CPU that can compete with high-end x86 desktop CPUs in terms of raw power it will use just as much power as Intel's/AMD's, expecially now that x86 CPUs with big/little design with efficiency cores are becoming available (Intel Alder Lake). Also, the CPU is not the only power consumer in a complete system.Not that Apple is ever going to go after the workstation, server or gaming markets (as they exist today), but at some point these market segments will realize that performance per watt is in fact crucial to the very survival of the market. Energy is not free and making devices that are huge energy users, when more efficient options exist or should be further developed, is not a place any manufacturer is going to want to be in the coming years.
In my follow up to you I clarified, to you that what I said was based on my experience with actual engineers. If you’ve had a different experience, good for you! However, based on what I see coming out of Intel… he’s no Lisa Su.But your statement was about all engineers. Not engineers that you know.
I’m sure Intel will do just fine. My point is that Apple is not going back to Intel. They want to control every part of their products and they finally have control over the timing and spec of CPU. Why would they want to throw this away? No chance. Intel can do whatever they want. It doesn’t matter to Apple now. Just like how your ex can date anyone she wants. It doesn’t matter to you anymore.Apple has used multiple different chips and architectures over the decades. Intel was a big part of Apple's resurgence. As always with processors, there are peaks and valleys for everyone. Remember when AMD was dead? Intel will be just fine if you remember that Apple is about 8% of the computer market.
You're probably right but never say never. Microsoft is going to do its own silicon, and Google will next week as well. I guess it's the new business model of choice, until the next one.I’m sure Intel will do just fine. My point is that Apple is not going back to Intel. They want to control every part of their products and they finally have control over the timing and spec of CPU. Why would they want to throw this away? No chance. Intel can do whatever they want. It doesn’t matter to Apple now. Just like how your ex can date anyone she wants. It doesn’t matter to you anymore.
Yeah, my comment didn't age very well. You nailed it! 🤣They don’t need to integrate with any GPUs on the high end. All they need is to produce a GPU that’s faster than any prior GPU in a Mac.
Maybe he'll put an Intel fab'ed FSD chip in a Tesla.Apple going back to Intel?
Sure... right after Elon puts a gas engine in a Tesla...
🤣
After the M1 Max reveal today, I can't even wait to see what they do with the Mac Pro. M2 Max w/ 32 CPU cores and 128 GPU cores?! We will see next summer.And with Apple now discontinuing last year's Intel Macs, it's guaranteed that the next model of Mac Pro will use Silicon.
BL.
Apple told Intel it needed better processors 17 years ago. Intel never really delivered what Apple wanted, especially the past 10 years or so. I can't see Apple working with them again anytime soon.
In a new episode of Axios on HBO shared by MarketWatch, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger sat down with Axios' Chief Technology Correspondent Ina Fried to discuss various topics, including Apple's transition to its own custom-designed silicon chips across its Mac lineup.
When asked if Intel has given up on the idea of the Mac running on Intel processors in the future, Gelsinger said that he hopes to win back this segment of Apple's business over time by outcompeting the company in chipmaking.
In the interview, Gelsinger acknowledged Intel's "stumbles" and said the company will "fight hard" to win back Apple's business by making better chips than Apple:In June 2020, Apple announced that it would be transitioning the Mac from Intel processors to its own custom-designed silicon chips, promising industry-leading performance per watt and improved graphics. The transition to Apple silicon began with the M1 chip in the MacBook Air, lower-end 13-inch MacBook Pro, and lower-end Mac mini in November 2020, and Apple said the transition would take around two years to be completed.
Intel has a lot of catching up to do if it aims to outclass Apple silicon, as benchmarks revealed that the MacBook Air with an M1 chip and a starting price of $999 outperforms a maxed-out Intel-based 16-inch MacBook Pro priced at $2,999.
In the meantime, Intel has been running ads promoting Windows PCs over Macs, and it even recruited former "I'm a Mac" actor Justin Long for the campaign.
The transition to Apple silicon is set to continue at Apple's virtual "Unleashed" event tomorrow, with the company widely expected to unveil redesigned 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with a faster version of the M1 chip. The notebooks are also rumored to feature brighter mini-LED displays, an HDMI port and SD card slot, and a magnetic power cable, while the Touch Bar is expected to be removed in favor of physical Fn keys.
Intel still supplies processors for some other Macs, including the 27-inch iMac and the Mac Pro, but those models are expected to adopt Apple silicon by next year.
Article Link: Intel CEO Hopes to Win Back Apple by Making Better Chips Than Apple
Especially now that some of what Apple’s going to want in ANY SoC is going to be hardware accelerated ProRES. The BEST Intel can hope for is to just be a foundry for Apple.Apple told Intel it needed better processors 17 years ago. Intel never really delivered what Apple wanted, especially the past 10 years or so. I can't see Apple working with them again anytime soon.
That would explain why their chips runs so hot... I'll show myself out.This is why competition is good. Looks like Intel finally has a fire ignited under them to catch up.
I guarantee you it doesn’t beat the Max in ’currently shipping in devices’. It also doesn’t beat the Max in processing 8k ProRes video.Maybe Apple should of listened to Intel as the new i9 beats the m1 max in everything and is still on 10nm lol
Maybe Apple should of listened to Intel as the new i9 beats the m1 max in everything and is still on 10nm lol
Even battery life and sustained performance when not plugged in to power?
I guarantee you it doesn’t beat the Max in ’currently shipping in devices’. It also doesn’t beat the Max in processing 8k ProRes video.