Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Doesn't look like Intel is crying very hard, or will be for quite some time.


In the fourth quarter of 2020, 61.4 percent of x86 computer processor or CPU tests recorded were from Intel processors. When looking solely at laptop CPUs, Intel is the clear winner, accounting for 80 percent of laptop CPU test benchmark results in the fourth quarter of 2020.

Doesn't look like MS has any immediate concerns either.


In the area of desktop and laptop computers, Microsoft Windows is the most commonly installed OS, at approximately between 77% and 87.8% globally. Apple's macOS accounts for approximately 9.6–13%, Google's Chrome OS is up to 6% (in the US) and other Linux distributions are at around 2%.

All you Apple only fanboi's need to get a grip, and let people use what they like to use.
 
Intel positions PCs as more "personalized" to fit a user's "specific hardware and software needs," while the M1 Macs offer "limited" device support, games, and creation applications. "The bottom line is a PC offers users a choice, something that users don't get with a Mac," reads the website.
That is completely true. In the other hand most of that "surplus" of games, applications and devices that exists in PC are a complete garbage.
 

Reminds me of a true story.

we engineers always use project names that have nothing to do (usually) with the names you folks know. Even when you hear a supposed “code name,” it’s not often the same as the name we use. So, for example, a chip like K6+ might be “chomper,” or whatever. This has caused me grief in the past when people have asked me detailed questions about some chip and I don’t actually know which chip that was, because we never paid attention to the marketing or “leaked to the press code” names of things.

Anyway, at a certain point we were going to start working for real on what we were calling “K8,” and our boss wanted us to come up with the nickname, so he sent out an email asking for suggestions. I’ll never forget when one guy suggested we name each chip in the K8 family after famous “kates.” His first suggestion was “Mulgrew.”

Happily, it turned out that we had recently been moved from the Nexgen building in milpitas to the first floor of AMD’s main building in sunnyvale, and we had a big stupid wall down the middle of our space. They were going to take the wall down, and i suggested to our boss that they let us each take a swing of the sledgehammer before the professionals got involved.

... and thus was born new chips named sledgehammer, clawhammer, jackhammer, etc... (which i guess led to bulldozer)

And Kate mulgrew will still not talk to me to this very day.
 
Yeah, AMD Ryan’s might be a little to good for Apple.
Really makes no difference. The OS and software is so optimized for apple silicon that, while on paper amd might look better, real life performance will tell a different story. While AMD has nothing to loose here, intel just lost 10% of the market overnight. They are understandably pissed off, but the latest commercials are beyond childish. They won’t be getting apple back and al the cons they’re highlighting are shared by intel macs. If rumors are to be believed, they may even be exclusive of intel macs, even though the processor isn’t the culprit of port availability.
 
Does Intel actually make a lot of $ from the small market share that Apple has vs all their other sales?
Well it's 5% of Intel's revenue but still over $3 billion. In 2019 Apple sold 17,684,000 Intel Macs.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
For me the only reasons I am not getting another Mac, M1 at that, are
3. "soldered" RAM and SSD.
Unless you plan on upgrading the RAM that isn't an issue and an external SSD takes
2. "planned obsolescence" by Apple, stopping supporting previous generations of their laptops, software wise.
Big Sur supports some models as far back as 2013 though I not sure why the iMac Pro got capped at 2017 while the iMac goes as far back as 2014.
While it will make sense with the jump to the M1, so far it didn't. You can install Windows 10 (big brother edition) on almost any PC, but if you want to install the latest macOS on a mac that is X years old, you are screwed.
Even with this back compatibility Windows users want to know how to run 16-bit programs on Windows 10. That is ridiculous. Why on Earth would any sane want to run software that old?
I do hope this will change, though I don't see how. It wasn't the architecture which stopped Apple before.
1. Prices and lack of support here in Greece.
That isn't Apple's fault. Greece has been effectively a basket case since 2011 and companies tend to avoid countries that have major financial troubles.

First of all you can't buy anything from Apple's site as they don't do that.
They may not be allowed to. I have no idea what additional import duties or restrictions that might apply to Greece. Also that 24.00% VAT adds up fast.
 
Just stop trying Intel. You know the M1 Chip will destroy Intel.
postpic1.png
 
Windows 7 was the last good OS. Now we have Windows 10 that includes updates that blue screen when you use a printer. Windows 7 was so good that blue screens meant hardware problems. That’s not the case anymore. It’s a shame.
Not my experience. My windows 10 desktop at the office is rock solid and fast enough. On a 7 years old machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy and bondr006
Unless you plan on upgrading the RAM that isn't an issue and an external SSD takes

Big Sur supports some models as far back as 2013 though I not sure why the iMac Pro got capped at 2017 while the iMac goes as far back as 2014.

Even with this back compatibility Windows users want to know how to run 16-bit programs on Windows 10. That is ridiculous. Why on Earth would any sane want to run software that old?

That isn't Apple's fault. Greece has been effectively a basket case since 2011 and companies tend to avoid countries that have major financial troubles.


They may not be allowed to. I have no idea what additional import duties or restrictions that might apply to Greece. Also that 24.00% VAT adds up fast.
Unless I plan on upgrading? OK, I plan on upgrading. So it is an issue just like that. It's not just that of course, RAM and SSD can go bad. Even if we had Apple stores here, it would still be bad to not be allowed to replace them yourself.
There is no reason to stop supporting previous hardware as long as we are talking about same architecture. The only reason they do it is to push newer models. As I said, planned obsolescence. Nothing less.

If people want to run 16-bit programs on Windows 10, that's their thing. It's not up to you to tell them to stop trying. Having said that, Windows stopped natively supporting 16-bit software for close to 20 years now. Using this as an example of too much is a bit too much. I wouldn't say no to run some old 16-bit software natively on Windows, but thankfully it's relatively easy to do so (virtualization and emulation). Thankfully nothing special has to be done for 32-bit software *cough* BS Apple move *cough*.

As for what you said about Greece, I am not even going to bother, you are clearly clueless.

Yes, every other company can sell them here just fine, but Apple no, they are special in import duties or restrictions...NOT.

I am well aware of VAT, which is why I originally mentioned it. As I said the increased prices have nothing to do with VAT as they are in addition to that.
 
Show the 'Desktop', whatever for?
No matter, that's a fairly backwards and limited way of using the filesystem!!!
Access the Desktop in the File Manager just like any other folder, because the only thing that comes to mind, (which is pointless anyway) in displaying the desktop, is to look at the picture.
Ah, so THAT is what people are talking about when they say that iOS doesn’t have a “proper filesystem”. EVERY OS has a filesystem, but it’s really just about being able to move around tiny pictures in order to see bigger ones! :)
 
You are spot on and the comments from gamers (as one example) really does show how little so many people know about computer sales. I know with forums like this, it’s attracting a very narrow and specific consumer, but for gamers to think they’re driving the broader computer market is just foolish. It’s a tiny slice of the overall market in both units sold and revenue generated. There is a reason Apple isn’t dedicating a lot of resources to gaming beyond on iOS.
 
... for gamers to think they’re driving the broader computer market is just foolish. It’s a tiny slice of the overall market in both units sold and revenue generated.
That may be true for computers in general, but not the computer parts like CPUs, GPUs, keyboards, etc.. These consumers are very dedicated and will (foolishly) pay top dollar for the most hyped products. Just look at how they reacted to the recent video card release. This in turn translates over time in how computers are marketed.
 
I'm surprised they're releasing these ads now while Apple is still buying chips from them for the high end 13" MBP, 16" MBP, iMac, iMac Pro (sold out now?) and Mac Pro.

Just seems a bit premature.
Maybe Apple has already let it's contracts run out. I'm sure those are made a year ahead of time and the new Apple "silikin" chips are probably already on the way.
 
Believe it or not, I actually like the Thunderbolt 3 ports only Macs. 4-port models, not 2-port. I see nothing wrong to carry dongles around. Nowadays, you can buy a single dongle that can do most of jobs you need and you don't need it all the time. I travel with both charger and dongle(s) without any issues. The slim Mac did help a lot. I have Dell XPS 13, Thunderbolt 3 ports only too, and it works great too. What I dont like is actually the touch screen on some Windows PC, and the way you can covert it to tablet mode. They both are the worst designs in PC industry. The touch screen feature would cause a lot of problem if you really use it on the daily basis. The 2-in-1 PC has been problematic too when you try to switch in between laptop mode and tablet mode. So hard to use it, and it's so heavy and bulky. just my 2 cents.

Apple should keep doing what they are doing, making Macs slim and clean, separate tablet and laptop to two, not convert them to one like PC, it never works properly, never.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deevey
That may be true for computers in general, but not the computer parts like CPUs, GPUs, keyboards, etc.. These consumers are very dedicated and will (foolishly) pay top dollar for the most hyped products. Just look at how they reacted to the recent video card release. This in turn translates over time in how computers are marketed.
This doesn't make sense. Most cpus, GPUs, etc. that are sold are sold in computers. And 80% of computers are sold via commercial channels, not retail.
 
[…]

Also, the ”show desktop” button is the lower right corner of Windows 10 is something I sometimes miss on MacOS. One can always cmd/option-click the Finder in the dock, but it's a bit more fiddly...

Trying to make a meny bar item that takes care of that in MacOS, but have so many other things that takes focus in this life. :)
Why so complicated? Just set up a Hot Corner (or whatever it's called in English) in System Preferences and you're good to go. I'm using this since at least MacOS X 10.4 Tiger - long before Windows even dreamt of this functionality.
 
What do you connect to your laptop that needs a dongle? In any fixed location (like one’s home or work desk), one is much better served with a reasonable dock to which one connects all one’s peripherals that can then connect with a single cable to one’s laptop.
Screens, TVs, projectors, and USB devices. They're adding HDMI back, which will be good enough for me. I used to also place an external keyboard atop mine because the built-in one is so bad, but company replaced my 2016 MBP with a 2019, which solved that.

The cheap docks are always flaky, especially with video outputs. I was fed up and wasted more company money on a CalDigit dock that finally worked, but in the past this was never necessary.
 
Last edited:
This is great news everyone because the only reason Intel is doing this is because they fear Apple.
They fear that Apple has just walked casually away from x86 like it's no big deal. Apple is still in the top ten home computer makers... literally NOBODY has ever walked away from Intel like this, for AMD... let alone their OWN processor.

others might follow Apple ... like Microsoft for their Surfaces.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.