Amen brother! I use PiHole!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 14's Upcoming Anti-Tracking Prompt Sparks Antitrust Complaint in France
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Sure, and you can already block tracking in settings if that's what you want (Settings > Privacy > Tracking). What we're talking about here is an annoying pop-up prompt in every single app.
This already exists (Settings > Privacy > Tracking).
France is being France, Apple is doing the right thing (to buoy their market share) and it happens to be the right thing for most folks cognizant of their own privacy. The anti-competitive argument will have a hard time standing up IMHO.
It's not an annoying pop-up prompt. It will be a once-per-app thing (similar to location services). I can't advocate for something like this enough.
Think about normal people - for every person who knows what advertisers get up to, use adblockers etc, there's hundreds/thousands of people who have absolutely no clue how their data is being used.
The only dodgy side is that we know Apple likes to embed OS-level ads for its services (e.g. your free Apple Music trial ad, which is served by knowing you don't have Apple Music, or an ad in the settings to sign up to AppleCare, which they know by grabbing your serial number and checking the database). I can understand how that could be seen as uncompetitive.
For the vast majority of apps the loss of Ad revenue can not be replaced with anything else. People do not do in app purchases or pay for the app in the quantity it would take to replace ad revenue. So the app would die and go away.
Apps are not free to make or run but so many people seem to think they are and it's too late to change that fact.
That's fine, I'll gladly pay for the apps I want that don't sling ads in my face every 5 seconds. If apps fail from lack of user tracking, again, I don't want to be a part of that app anyway. I am fine with fee-for-service as there are super hardworking developers who need to make their money! Personally, I am not fine with track-for-service.
But! I know others have different opinions and that is ok - that is why both models exist and we, as the user, can choose.
If after all of that an app still can't survive, that is just an indication of the free market doing its thing.
You might want to read the expanded Tracking text from that current option, it clearly states that apps MAY CHOOSE TO ASK FOR PERMISSION, the new function forces them to, BIG DIFFERENCE!
If this goes thru... I would have lost further faith in humanity.
So what, I don't want to be tracked.
The "freemium" model should either DIE or be opt-in, if you choose to give up your privacy for some crappy free game then please do, I don't want to stop you but I don't want to be tracked and therefor I don't generally use free apps, I buy them. Of course buying them doesn't guarantee that the app is not still spying ex: clipboard scraping scandal.
Last edited:
There is, blanket topic based advertising rather than individually targeted advertising.
Agencies will hate it, because it levels the playing field to what it used to be prior to what it is now.
Ad's will still be relevant, just to a much less personal degree. I don't believe any standalone App should be allowed to track your internet movements across multiple platforms/browsers/apps whatsoever.
Don't worry you'll still get lots of relevant ads if you try hard enough.
In this case, it's Apple asking their customers if the customers would like Apple to forward their information to third parties or not. As an Apple customer, I am paying Apple to protect my personal data which they have access to and I am happy to pay them for this service.
All apps that use ads are not just some "crappy free game".
You can sit and type all day long that you buy apps, well you're in the major minority there.
Sounds like you need to be using Android.
If the only way they can make money is through this tracking, they should not exist anyway. The app store, and world, would be a better a place if all these developers went out of business.
The technical middle ground would be only companies that have a viable product that people want to use without being spied on have any right to exist.
So much time, money and brainpower is being wasted with stupid intellectual debates like this around the world.
If companies want to collect my “advertising identifier” then that’s my choice, and your choice. If we decline, those companies are free to decline their services. Done. Move on. Go solve real problems in the world.
If companies want to collect my “advertising identifier” then that’s my choice, and your choice. If we decline, those companies are free to decline their services. Done. Move on. Go solve real problems in the world.
The app it self it not tracking you 99.9% of the time.
these advertisement companies need to stop whining. explain to people why it is beneficial for them. people will decide if they think it is good for them. I still recall when advertising don't track people. they develop amazing Ads to convince folks to buy the product.
If it's a good app, it's not a problem and people will pay. I don't do free apps just for the fact that they always (99%) of the time, have ads. Some don't even have the option to pay to remove them. Again, if the app is worth it, ads aren't a problem. People will pay money for it. Within reason. Nobody says apps need to be free. You can thank Google for creating that mindset with all their "free" stuff. Same with FaceBook.
I don't want to be tracked. Period. It's my ****ing device, I pay for it, I pay for the service/bandwidth, stop ****ing using up my ****. There should be laws against that. Serve them on your OWN DIME, not mine.
It is rather well documented that people will opt out if offered the chance, so you advocate keeping them in the dark so that free apps can continue to harvest personal data without consent?
FAKE NEWS! Free apps, supported by the ad model, can certainly continue to exist but as an opt-in model.
I support the idea of apps asking at install if the user consents to tracking in order to get the app to function, if you choose to protect your privacy and not opt-in the app will not work.
Knowledge and choice are never bad.
You don't need to track to advertise. You just need to be smarter about your ads.
It doesn't mater if it's a good app, if the app can't survive now as a paid only app they can not survive next year with loosing advertising revenue.
The majority of people are not going to pay for the app even if its good. You might get one sale for 1000 free downloads as a good app. This is not that hard to understand. Become a developer and try it.
The person who pays to run the internet reliant app pays for the bandwidth. Go look at people's AWS bandwidth bills, Azure, Google Cloud, "insert dedicated server host name here" bandwidth bill. You think it's free to run an app today? Bandwidth isn't free for developers.
If an app had a 50% reduction in revenue it would stop existing. If any business had a 50% reduction in revenue it would stop existing.
Then that's the problem of the developer then isn't it? Make a good app, people will pay for it. Plain and simple.
Again, FAKE NEWS!
Force free apps into an opt-in model and you can have your cake and eat it too. People who don't care about their privacy can be harvested.
Those that care about privacy and don't want to be tracked will buy your app, problem solved.