It's always funny to me that a new major version's selling point is to fix the previous major version's flaws - instead of insisting on an annual cycle for the sake of tradition (?), why not release when needed and ready?
Because it’s an illusion to think software like this is ever ‘ready’ or a multi-year release cycle will make things substantially better. We’ve seen in the past with Mac OS X that isn’t the case.It's always funny to me that a new major version's selling point is to fix the previous major version's flaws - instead of insisting on an annual cycle for the sake of tradition (?), why not release when needed and ready?
Oh I know, I could say the same about my employer - or in tech in general. Hence why they shouldn't release stuff for the sake of releasing stuff, it's never going to be complete/final/perfect, but the level of slop and bugs becomes inexcusable.Because it’s an illusion to think software like this is ever ‘ready’ or a multi-year release cycle will make things substantially better. We’ve seen in the past with Mac OS X that isn’t the case.
Aside if you like Liquid Glass or not, my 16e has absolutely taken a battery hit from it & I’ve had adaptive power mode turned on since day 1 of iOS 27.iOS is not in a bad shape. It's macOS that needs a 'Snow Leopard' release much more urgently.
I hope all Apple OS 27 gets this treatment.I hope for the same focus on macOS 27
In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reiterated that iOS 27 will be similar to 2009's Mac OS X Snow Leopard, in the sense that one of Apple's biggest priorities is bug fixes for improved performance and stability.
You can reinstall the OS, but the music library and your play lists do not revert, you have to recreate them from scratch. The same applies to the Photos library.apple can only fix issues users report and you can't find issues if you don't install and use it. Mac OS allows you to "downgrade", so why don't you test Tahoe?
10.6.8 forever.
Well, if they have any messaging skills, they could duck the whole Tahoe disaster and frame this as being "we can use our annual release schedule to improve quality, as opposed to Microsoft sitting on an upgrade for five years, botching it and cutting off support for the stable legacy version anyway."It's always funny to me that a new major version's selling point is to fix the previous major version's flaws - instead of insisting on an annual cycle for the sake of tradition (?), why not release when needed and ready?
It's not great, but I can live with LG on my iPhone.I agree with you that iOS isn’t disaster. But it’s not the software equivalent of the excellent hardware.
Right on! "SnowHoe" is another example of Apple choosing "quality as an act, not as a habit."Doubling down on stupid is stupid.
And don't forget to disconnect your previous Time Machine backup, if you rely upon it as a backup, as it will be migrated to the new system and will NOT allow a reverse-migration (restore over the older OS) if you try.You can reinstall the OS, but the music library and your play lists do not revert, you have to recreate them from scratch. The same applies to the Photos library.
Apple has several "check valves" to enforce its onward march. So if you do want to try Tahoe back up everything first. And don't forget the user library folder which is easily forgotten since it doesn't show up in Finder.
The other option I think is possible is to install Tahoe on an external drive. Then you can try it and if you don't like it just wipe the drive.