Is there any precedent for 1136x640? 1136 seems like a strange number.
It's not quite exactly 16:9 ....
(Exactly 16:9 would be 1137.777777777777777777777777777...x640 - but Apple wouldn't be irrational.)
Is there any precedent for 1136x640? 1136 seems like a strange number.
How do they have App Store apps installed in the iPhone simulator? There is no App Store access. For now, I call PS shenanigans.
Ready for what? Something bigger and more satisfying?![]()
For those worried about the "long-phone" you should look at this thread.
Turns out the sony xperia play has the same 4 inch 16:9 screen, and it doesn't look to bad.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1419260/
[url=http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/7963/xperiaplayiphonescreenc.th.png]Image[/URL]
Will the screen still be considered retina? What will the ppi be with a 4inch screen?
I hate how most of the comments in the 9to5Mac article are about how hard this is for developers. I'm a developer, and I don't care.
My apps already dynamically resize to whatever resolution the device is. In fact, my app will probably look great out-of-the-box without me changing anything. I think it's even ironic that non-developers are expressing non-existent developer woes to justify their distaste for change.
Development aside, I've been supporting this resolution since day one and I still do. I think it's a nice refresh without changing much, but it'll be awesome to have more on my screen for minimal device changes.
Agreed. It would be nice if Apple allowed users to turn off individual apps in the settings like they did with the Nike+ app. Like so:
Really? just rely on autoresizingmask property.
It is depending on how complicated your apps are, if it is just uitableview, of course, it is will resize properly by itself. What if the app is landscape mode.
Also, for designer, they need to design 1136 x 640 launch screen as well.
This topic, and...hell, the whole taller screen iPhone 5 debacle has shown me one very funny thing. We've got this whole group of people claiming to support a single company because they're allegedly the most innovative and revolutionary of the bunch, right?
So why are they the first to complain when this company tries something different?
TALLER IPHONE? STEVE JOBS IS ROLLING IN HIS GRAVE!
because the new iPhone 4SL is neither innovative or revolutionary.
yea, an Apple product
How do they have App Store apps installed in the iPhone simulator? There is no App Store access. For now, I call PS shenanigans.
It's not quite exactly 16:9 ....
(Exactly 16:9 would be 1137.777777777777777777777777777...x640 - but Apple wouldn't be irrational.)
An Apple product with a bunch of little Samsung products inside.
1113.77777..... is not irrational.
Last year around this time it was as much real as this tall iPhone.
Damnit. I guess this pretty much confirms it. Seriously Apple, when we cried for a bigger screen, I think it's safe to say most of us were more concerned with width.
I guess that'll teach us for asking for anything different from Apple.
I love iOS and would much rather stay with it, but the dinky screen in my 4S is just too pathetic, and stretching it a bit taller isn't going to cut it. I don't care if siri on the next iPhone can read my mind and obey my thoughts, if this is the screen we get, I'm leaving the platform.