Pretty sure it will stand for 'Scanner'.
Sigh, everyone here is missing the important part:
The fingerprint sensor is being tied to the FFC for security. So, to make a payment or unlock your phone, you'll seemingly need to take a photo of the user while they have their thumb on the home button. This is far and away more secure than Android's "Face Unlock" feature and less taxing than remembering a PIN for payments.
...And goodbye Otterbox Defenders. It was a good run.
(I prefer Ballistic's SG. Leaves screen and home button bare.)
Yeah, because this has never been done before Samsung? Where have you been? A crappy Dell I had from almost 10 years ago had this. It's not new tech. Apple doesn't claim to have invented it either. You are aware they bought the company that makes these, aren't you? (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Appl...6-million-James-Bond-iPhone-to-follow_id32725)
Really? Your fingerprints will be all over the phone, shouldn't be too difficult to lift them
This is a ridiculous comment.
Wikipedia: "Biometrics (or biometric authentication) refers to the identification of humans by their characteristics or traits"
"Biooptics" isn't even a word.
Anything that reads a fingerprint is included in the definition of biometrics. The implementation details decide if it has weak or strong security, and the hack I mentioned has been demonstrated many times on the most commonly available scanners.
Everything you've said is complete hogwash.
Best not to loose the finger.
It's asking the bad guys to chop the fingers off.
Geez I'm sticking to iPhone 5.
Um, maybe I'm misunderstanding that text string, but it seemed to me like that was an introduction/tutorial on how to use it. The phone would go through a setup process showing pictures of how to use it. Not that it would require a picture of a person touching the home button to operate, that would literally be impossible from the front camera lol. Just think about it....how would the camera attached to the phone get a wider shot of a person holding the device with their finger on the button....lol
So this means the home button in the 5S must be capacitive right?
They cant add a fingerprint sensor on the physical home button, so I guess there will be no more hardware button, instead replaced by a capacitive one.
Really?
I could have sworn that the ribbon cable for the home button was already leaked and showed a lot more pins than previous ones.
Really damn easy to fake. Most finger print scanners can be fooled by using a laser print of the finger print and your own finger for the rest of the biometrics (heat, pulse, etc).
Use it to select the user only. Then require a password. This could be the key to unlocking multiple user accounts. That would be more useful than using the finger print as a password.
That's what I was also wondering!
P.S. - Not to be a Grammar Nazi, but without proper punctuation in your signature, it reads as if Schiller is saying, his ass can't be innovated anymore![]()
Really damn easy to fake. Most finger print scanners can be fooled by using a laser print of the finger print and your own finger for the rest of the biometrics (heat, pulse, etc).
Use it to select the user only. Then require a password. This could be the key to unlocking multiple user accounts. That would be more useful than using the finger print as a password.
Yeah, because this has never been done before Samsung? Where have you been? A crappy Dell I had from almost 10 years ago had this. It's not new tech. Apple doesn't claim to have invented it either. You are aware they bought the company that makes these, aren't you? (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Appl...6-million-James-Bond-iPhone-to-follow_id32725)
Seems this will be a iPhone 5 s hardware exclusive, so as to make people upgrade to the newest phone (as opposed to being a software feature).
Oh yes, give the NSA your finger prints... It's not like they STORE IT in a huge facility filled with computers with the equivalent storage as 32 gb iPhones stacked to the moon and a bit more.